Kit testified in person that he supports the new requirements for handgun safety classes.  He also supports the vetting of instructors by HPD.  Becuase he has seen unsafe instruction at the range.

Kit n Gun has said other remarks that go against the 2A and from what I've heard, he had a couple applicant's have ND's doing the HPD tests and other issues.

Or he should've stayed home since he didn't want anything changed in the policy.

after listening to Kits testimony, this is what I got from it.  He seemed to go after people with no firearms training, like people who take hunters ed only to get and carry a handgun and that HPDs requirements ensure they get that training to carry.

Those could be good points.  However what he should've said is there should be no requirements to carry a gun under the 2A.  Instead people should be heavily encouraged to seek training on their own.

Or he should've stayed home since he didn't want anything changed in the policy.

so you want to deny his first amendment right?

There's a difference between can and should

Or in otherwords a term we use in the Army...good initiative, bad judgement.

Unsafe Instructors, maybe that's why his classes got removed from another private range, putting dumb shit on Instagram.

so you want to deny his first amendment right?

Just like the difference between a chiropractor and a medical doctor...

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C16BFm3uHS3/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

All you crybabies need to respect his freedom of speech while he criticizes you for your freedom of speech.