So you can't wear a ski mask in public or private places open to the public.  Sounds familiar.



Also of note it excludes the following place from the ban.  Why on earth would a person wear a mask to one of these events
...hmmm....
 (f)   While lawfully engaged in activities protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

Kila voted against the sensitive places ban last year.

Should include face mask when worn with hat.
Same coverage. 

They turned a bunch of Lib Kids into terrorists and lost control of them. Lord help us.

Should include face mask when worn with hat.
Same coverage. 

============
Next on the ban list is hoodies.
That's what I see most perps wearing on surveillance camera videos.

what about medical or n95 masks?

So you can't wear a ski mask in public or private places open to the public.  Sounds familiar.



Also of note it excludes the following place from the ban.  Why on earth would a person wear a mask to one of these events
...hmmm....
 (f)   While lawfully engaged in activities protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

Yeah, because criminals have a dress code.  They never use bandanas, Halloween masks, motorcycle helmets or other face coverings when they want to remain unidentified.

We should ban this next ...

the 1st right to fall...

I refuse to give up my Kato Green Hornet mask.......

Robin can give up his mask.  But not me.

I'm Bwoose Rhree.

Yeah, because criminals have a dress code.  They never use bandanas, Halloween masks, motorcycle helmets or other face coverings when they want to remain unidentified.

We should ban this next ...

Are you being serious?

So you can't wear a ski mask in public or private places open to the public.  Sounds familiar.



Also of note it excludes the following place from the ban.  Why on earth would a person wear a mask to one of these events
...hmmm....
 (f)   While lawfully engaged in activities protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

Why though? What problem are they trying to solve here?

swoooosh

Are you being serious?

macsak brought up a good point about covid masks.
When I go shopping, I still see MANY people wearing face masks.
Especially when the local weather turned very cold last week.

Makes me wonder if the sponsors of this bill have any contact with the general public.
Makes me wonder if OUR local legislators actually have any contact with the general public other than photo ops.

I decided to read the bill

"§711-     Concealed identity; ski mask or balaclava; public places; prohibited.  (1)  It shall be unlawful for any person to wear a ski mask or balaclava in a public place or on any mode of public transportation.

     (2)  This section shall not be construed to apply to any person who wears a ski mask or balaclava:

    (a)   As part of a traditional holiday costume;

    (b)   For a religious purpose;

    (c)   While engaged in a trade or employment where they are worn for the purpose of ensuring the physical safety of the wearer;

    (d)   In a theatrical production;

    (e)   For the purpose of protecting the wearer from the elements while participating in a winter sport; or

    (f)   While lawfully engaged in activities protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

     (3)  Any person who violates this section shall be fined no more than $250.

     (4)  For the purposes of this section:

     "Public place" means an area generally open to the public, regardless of whether it is privately owned, and includes but is not limited to any street, sidewalk, park, parking lot, store, restaurant, school building, recreation center, daycare facility, and government-owned building.

     "Ski mask or balaclava" means a close-fitting garment covering the whole head and face, with holes for the eyes, mouth, or nose, or any combination of the three.""

Sounds like a bill to cater toward constituents who complained to their offices.

"For religious purpose", we've seen the state/city crap over this when mandating covid shots. So don't hold your breath to use this as an excuse.

Makes me wonder if OUR local legislators actually have any contact with the general public other than photo ops.

Kila does. He stated he voted no on sensitive places bill (SB123) because its what his people wanted. He went against party lines on this bill.

what about medical or n95 masks?

This bill is only for ski mask and bac's. So halloween mask and N95 are g2g.

Kila does. He stated he voted no on sensitive places bill (SB123) because its what his people wanted. He went against party lines on this bill.

Kila is pretty supportive of the 2A.  He has a no duty to retreat bill introduced too.

what about medical or n95 masks?

This bill is only for ski mask and bac's. So halloween mask and N95 are g2g.

To me the bill is like the people who introduced it:  retarded.

My primary physician has been wearing a face shield and mask ever since the mandates.  Because of my health condition I visit her 2 times a year.

I don't know how she looks like anymore.  I forget.  I know she's a hottie.   Even with the face shield on and a mask she still looks good. 

If not a hottie at least a warmie.