at the hearing, he (approx) said, "we are trying to define the line from a knife to a nuclear weapon what should not be allowed"

In my opinion, Rhoads as a political leader needs to learn as much about what he is trying to ban for him to be regarded with respect and integrity.

To try to ban what he is trying to ban while showing he has no real integral knowledge of what he is banning only shows he is pushing an agenda.

He doesn't care.  That's what I get from all of this.

And I don't think for one minute he thinks this SB3196 will decrease crime and increase safety for the people.  He might not know a lot about firearms but he's not stupid.

This guy is going for a complete ban on all firearms from citizens.  SB3196 is just a stepping stone.

at the hearing, he (approx) said, "we are trying to define the line from a knife to a nuclear weapon what should not be allowed"

I think there might be one or two laws already on the books regarding nukes and other WMDs.

Maybe he needs to do some research before reinventing the proverbial wheel?

i didn't say he was trying to ban nukes, i said he was trying to draw a line...

I think there might be one or two laws already on the books regarding nukes and other WMDs.

Maybe he needs to do some research before reinventing the proverbial wheel?

i didn't say he was trying to ban nukes, i said he was trying to draw a line...

And, I, too, didn't mention banning nukes, did I?

I said: there are already laws regarding nukes -- implying that the line you stated he's "trying to draw" already exists.

ah ok
he's trying to draw the line further from nukes to assault rifles and assault shotguns
he got denied, so he is trying to draw it at .50cal

And, I, too, didn't mention banning nukes, did I?

I said: there are already laws regarding nukes -- implying that the line you stated he's "trying to draw" already exists.

ah ok
he's trying to draw the line further from nukes to assault rifles and assault shotguns
he got denied, so he is trying to draw it at .50cal

I'm not saying what he's trying to do -- you said he did.

I only mentioned that nukes are not part of the equation. If he said that, it's nothing but hyperbolic nonsense.

Let me try to translate, "all assault weapons bad!!!"

Sent from my moto g power (2021) using Tapatalk

So SB3196 passed the Senate JDC committee where they did some smoke and mirrors and will it now go to the Senate for vote?

Any chance it can die there? 

Or is the Senate vote just pomp and circumstance (translation: waste of money and time with bureaucratic Bullsh*t fanfare) and SB3196 is a done deal with it's backdoor re-shuffling of legalese intact?

So SB3196 passed the Senate JDC committee where they did some smoke and mirrors and will it now go to the Senate for vote?

Any chance it can die there? 

Or is the Senate vote just pomp and circumstance (translation: waste of money and time with bureaucratic Bullsh*t fanfare) and SB3196 is a done deal with it's backdoor re-shuffling of legalese intact?

Never mind.  Disregard.  Just saw this:

https://2ahawaii.com/index.php?topic=52840.0