As for confiscation and mandatory buy-back of weapons by the government, this was tried by Australia in 2011, and the results are dismal.
Since Australia’s gun ban, armed robberies jumped 68 percent, assaults with guns rose 28 percent, gun murders are up 19 percent and home invasions increased 21 percent.

As for confiscation and mandatory buy-back of weapons by the government, this was tried by Australia in 2011, and the results are dismal.
Since Australia’s gun ban, armed robberies jumped 68 percent, assaults with guns rose 28 percent, gun murders are up 19 percent and home invasions increased 21 percent.

This is the plan, the facts are indisputable.

I didnt even read the articles.  I have just been observing what has been going on in all media outlets. Nothing but brainwashing and misinformation.  Prep for what is to come.  All they need is that 51% support, or perceived majority in any case. And they are getting it too.

the house has a majority republicans.  the dems would not only need to hold onto all of theirs (will be hard), but also change 23 Republican minds.  its not gonna pass.

beyond that, the senate doesnt have a supermajority.  they can be filibustered. 

also note, we wont be seeing anything really til the end of January at the earliest.  the furor is already dieing down.  come legislative time, they're not going to have the kind of support they do now.

The Repubs are weak minded. They lost the election because of their lack of values and their abandon of them. They believed the media complex when they said the teaparty movement was bad news for them.  They forgot to relilize that America wanted a real change, the reason why they won the house. They will cave to appease the masses and try secure their re-elections.  Which they wont be able to achieve anyway. They don't have the balls to stand up to the messiah.

no one's going to remember this come re election. 

and yes, the tea party movement was bad for them. it was too extreme and had no hope of attracting to moderate voters you need to win an election.  Obama won because he convinced people he could work across the aisle.  a lie, but it worked.  the tea party is too extreme for the middle voters.

Romney did win moderate voters. He didnt win the election. Why? Because he was Obama light. I voted for him, not cause he was the best choice, but because he was the only alternative.  Tea party swept the house in 2010 because people where tired of the status quo.  Romney lost because he represnted the same old same old.  Not what America wanted.  The only reason the teaparty is 'extreme' , as you put it, is because the bull shit media made them out, falsely, to be so.  People dont want 'reaching across the aisle',a other media spin in my veiw, people want solutions and change to the corruption.  How else would they have won in 2010?

he did not win that many moderate voters, dude.  you dont get hammered like that in the election if you won over moderates.

and they are extreme.  when you look a the political spectrum that exists in congress, they're the farthest right.  the extreme.  who's more conservative than them?  no one.  hence, they are the extreme.

Time to go to Home Depot or Lowe's for pvc pipe!

don't forget epoxy