http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495

It appears that the shooter DID NOT use the evil black rifle in the heinous act.  Will these anti gun fools get off the rediculous issue that the weapon is to blame for the crimes we must face. Or, will they continue on their irrational quest to disarm the good people and leave them to fend for themselves in the evil world me must live in?

(Thanks to Teichi for this link on FB)

This is pretty old, the medical examiner's comments are the most recent word I've seen.  My question is, why is it that everyone reports that the rifle wasn't used, but the ME says it was?  What's easier to identify, a mangled bullet pulled out of a body, or a piece of brass on the floor that says "9x19" or ".223"?  Why is the media taking only the word of the medical examiner?  Is it because he's the only one so far who's said that the rifle was used?

^^ME could be under some serious political pressure.

Also............shooter got in an altercation with school peeps before............no LEO's called?  No follow up?  Lawsuit is coming............

Heavies, it looks like you fell for the same video that I did in my Dec 24 post "No AR-15 used in the Sandy Hook school shooting?". Other posts on ar15.com said that the news video was made shortly after the shooting, and later information revealed that there most likely WAS a Bushmaster recovered near Adam Lanza at the school, along with a SIG and a Glock. 
It looks like we'll have to wait for the final investigative report on the shooting to find out the true details.

whoops!  looks like I jumped the "gun".

whoops!  looks like I jumped the "gun".

This is such a screwed-up story all the way around.  First, he didn't use the AR.  Then he did.  Then we got word from state and federal officials that he didn't, after all.  Once that was all settled, the ME says it was a long gun, while refusing to say what caliber the bullets were.  When a reporter says, "I thought the rifle was found in the car", a state trooper just says, "That's not right."  And as far as I know, that's the final word.  But don't worry, H. Wayne II assures us that "[he] probably knows more about guns than most other pathologists".   

Why are there no crime scene photos?  No witness interviews in the media?  The Bushmaster angle certainly fits the media's narrative, and there should be plenty of students and faculty who would be able to say on camera, "Then the guy came into the classroom with a big black rifle."  Why is there no information whatsoever about what the hell happened?  I'll say it again, 

Believe what you will be there are a few YouTube videos out saying sandy hook was a hoskes.

Another one someone showed me, a few years back apparently there was a training at the school for this kind of stuff.  And everything played out exactly the same. Number of casualties, etc, etc.

Other instances of terror attacks and the like have been run through as training by the government years before with the same results, even London as well.

I only watched a few, however there are choke videos if you into believing that kinda stuff.

The gun removed from a trunk was not a AR-15;  The ME is going to be able to tell the difference between rifle / pistol shots easily.  This story is not backed up by anything really.

The video going around was aired on December 15th in the early stages of the story of this event.

Before the coroners statement.
Listen to the police scanner recordings and I think they say a rifle and multiple handguns were found.

In the beginning I thought it was totally weird that the Coroner would be the one to report a rifle was used.  Why not the Police ?