Trump should not chicken out and do a debate on fox.   He will still be an utter disgrace on that too.  Even if the mods don't point out his endless lies.

Why should I care what a singer, or any celebrity endorses?

As for the debate, it was garbage. There were a few good blows back and forth but Trump did crappy, Harris was crappy, and the moderators were terrible.

Trump should not chicken out and do a debate on fox.   He will still be an utter disgrace on that too.  Even if the mods don't point out his endless lies.

What about your princess's lies.  She get's a free pass like last time?

Your term "chicken out" can be applied to her highness also.  Would have loved to have seen that Sept. 4th debate but I guess the princess wasn't ready.

Trump, with all his "shortcomings" still shows up even if not quite as prepared.

By the way, moderators are not supposed to fact check.  That's why the ABC "debate" was a joke.

People are beginning to realize who the real "bully" is here.  It's not Trump.

Time to trim the huge, ugly tree called government down to size.  Getting too big, smug, and obnoxious.

Swifts pick in men isn't the greatest. Maybe her pick in women is better?  I'd watch that OF video. Her and Hyena. I mean, why not add in AOC and generate billions in revenue.

Trump should not chicken out and do a debate on fox.   He will still be an utter disgrace on that too.  Even if the mods don't point out his endless lies.

When a debate ends, the winner is usually less interested in a rematch.  They know they won, and a rematch just gives the other side a second chance to do better.

The loser is the one who will push for a second debate, because they know they need to repair the damage.

Remember when Obama failed miserably in the first debate against Romney?  The whole MSM was ready to throw in the towel.  Only after Candy Crowley, the supposed moderator, inaccurately fact-checked Romney (at Obama's request) did Romney realize he was being tag teamed.  Romney's answers were still better, but Obama gained back his confidence which in turn let him throw zingers to score points.

So, pay attention to who is calling for another debate.  That will show you without a doubt which side knows they lost.

She was literally given every advantage and still lost

That has not been proven to be true. The ear rings she is wearing to share many similarities with the ear pieces by that company but they also closely resemble a model of Tiffany ear rings.

After looking at both, what she is wearing during the debate looks more like the Tiffany ear rings than that brand of earpiece.

That has not been proven to be true. The ear rings she is wearing to share many similarities with the ear pieces by that company but they also closely resemble a model of Tiffany ear rings.

After looking at both, what she is wearing during the debate looks more like the Tiffany ear rings than that brand of earpiece.

If these were part of a kick starter project, could the project developers not be contacted and provided a regular pair of Tiffany earrings to retrofit?  If it were me, I'd have provided 2 identical pair of earrings -- one with the BT electronics and one without.  Then you can be seen with the regular pair before and after the debate, and nobody would take a second glance.

One inconsistency might be enough for you to question it, but to a thinking person, would it not be more reasonable to assume an effort was made to add an inconsistency for the naysayers to hitch their denials to?  Comparing what she wore to a photo on the project website won't prove anything except the ones she wore were different -- not that they weren't a cheat.

When a debate ends, the winner is usually less interested in a rematch.  They know they won, and a rematch just gives the other side a second chance to do better..

 A second debate isn't a rematch and when have you ever known Trump to admit he lost something even when he obviously did? Trump not being interested in a second debate has zero bearing on whether he was the "winner". I could just as easily say that Trump doesn't want to do a second debate because he knows he lost the first.

Trump's performance was garbage. He got a few good hits in but he fell for the bait as soon as Harris mentioned crowd size and he went off on the tangent about Hattians eating pets and rather than maturely walking back his statement when he was confronted that there wasn't any evidence of this actually happening he doubled down by saying he heard someone say it on TV. He couldn't stay on topic and ranted like an old angry man. Even Brit Hume from fox said “Make no mistake about it: Trump had a bad night,”

If you think he actually performed well during the debate then so be it but his proclaiming there won't be another debate is not indicative of how well he performed.

 

If these were part of a kick starter project, could the project developers not be contacted and provided a regular pair of Tiffany earrings to retrofit?  If it were me, I'd have provided 2 identical pair of earrings -- one with the BT electronics and one without.  Then you can be seen with the regular pair before and after the debate, and nobody would take a second glance.

One inconsistency might be enough for you to question it, but to a thinking person, would it not be more reasonable to assume an effort was made to add an inconsistency for the naysayers to hitch their denials to?  Comparing what she wore to a photo on the project website won't prove anything except the ones she wore were different -- not that they weren't a cheat.

Is it possible that someone custom made the earbuds to closely resemble Tiffany earrings or modified the earbuds to closely resemble Tiffany earrings? Sure, such a thing could be done but anyone proclaiming it as a fact is just being lead by desires.

Honestly, if she really were going to wear earbuds then why not where tiny in-ear ones that wouldn't show up at all? Or why not hide those bone conducting earpieces under her hair where no one would be able to see it at all?  Seems awfully risky to try and hide earbuds in plain sight when the product is publicly known. Again, not saying they could not have been earbuds but I would call it very unlikely.

If she was wearing earbuds and listening to someone coaching her then they must not have been working right because she really didn't say much of any substance.

A second debate isn't a rematch and when have you ever known Trump to admit he lost something even when he obviously did? Trump not being interested in a second debate has zero bearing on whether he was the "winner". I could just as easily say that Trump doesn't want to do a second debate because he knows he lost the first.

Trump's performance was garbage. He got a few good hits in but he fell for the bait as soon as Harris mentioned crowd size and he went off on the tangent about Hattians eating pets and rather than maturely walking back his statement when he was confronted that there wasn't any evidence of this actually happening he doubled down by saying he heard someone say it on TV. He couldn't stay on topic and ranted like an old angry man. Even Brit Hume from fox said “Make no mistake about it: Trump had a bad night,”

If you think he actually performed well during the debate then so be it but his proclaiming there won't be another debate is not indicative of how well he performed.

Wrong.

in the debates of 15 years ago when Obama was debating, each debate night was supposed to focus on different areas: economy, foreign policy, domestic social issues, etc.  If you watched the debate this  week, you should have seen the departure from that.  They presented a hodge podge of topics, supposedly taken from the top issues on voters' minds.

So, if there is another debate, it won't be because it was programmed with a different area of topics.  It'll be for Harris to rehabilitate her campaign closer to the election -- and that means trying to get Trump to make himself look worse.  There's little chance that Harris can improve anymore than her current self.

Is it possible that someone custom made the earbuds to closely resemble Tiffany earrings or modified the earbuds to closely resemble Tiffany earrings? Sure, such a thing could be done but anyone proclaiming it as a fact is just being lead by desires.

Honestly, if she really were going to wear earbuds then why not where tiny in-ear ones that wouldn't show up at all? Or why not hide those bone conducting earpieces under her hair where no one would be able to see it at all?  Seems awfully risky to try and hide earbuds in plain sight when the product is publicly known. Again, not saying they could not have been earbuds but I would call it very unlikely.

If she was wearing earbuds and listening to someone coaching her then they must not have been working right because she really didn't say much of any substance.

More unsupported questions.

 

More unsupported questions.

 

The people who opened the border, crashed the dollar, weaponized the justice system, and forced everyone to take dangerous experimental drugs would never stoop that low.

I read somewhere or watched something that stated that Taylor Swift's endorsement was supposed to be an "October surprise".  The final push to get the princess through the election.

But instead the endorsement was revealed the same night as the debate ended.

But it didn't move the needle either way for the princess.

Is it possible that someone custom made the earbuds to closely resemble Tiffany earrings or modified the earbuds to closely resemble Tiffany earrings? Sure, such a thing could be done but anyone proclaiming it as a fact is just being lead by desires.

Honestly, if she really were going to wear earbuds then why not where tiny in-ear ones that wouldn't show up at all? Or why not hide those bone conducting earpieces under her hair where no one would be able to see it at all?  Seems awfully risky to try and hide earbuds in plain sight when the product is publicly known. Again, not saying they could not have been earbuds but I would call it very unlikely.

If she was wearing earbuds and listening to someone coaching her then they must not have been working right because she really didn't say much of any substance.

Have you never worn an ear device?  Even the "covert" ones are visible to someone looking for one.  Their best option was to use rings with a speaker.  What they didn't factor in was the power of using the internet to find the truth. This is something their campaign and admin haven't understood yet.  Instead, they rely on controlling the flow of information.

I wear ear devices.  I get called out all the time when at the craps tables.  Next time I'll tell them my auntie kamala made these especially for me......

 

Seriously, though, the only reason sh*t like these flies around is because she is known to be very weak on interviews and when confronted with impromptu questions from reporters.

She looked unusually out of character that night but of course, ABC helped with that.

Starting a sentence with "honestly". So you were lying to us before?. So dumb.
Anyone with an SDR tuned to those ISM freqs can figure out if the hyena was wearing a wireless receiver.

Starting a sentence with "honestly". So you were lying to us before?. So dumb.
Anyone with an SDR tuned to those ISM freqs can figure out if the hyena was wearing a wireless receiver.

Yeah, people that start their statement with "honestly", are not, well, honest.

Yes, it is an inherent biden administration trait and yes, it is so dumb.......

And I'd also like to add:  Anyone that laughs and smiles and giggles regularly often hides lack of confidence and sincerity.

They were asked to produce evidence and they had nothing.

He has no case and over 60 judges said so. Even Judges that he appointed ruled that he had no evidence and no standing. They have never provided any evidence of election fraud and never will. Anomalies are not evidence. They already tried that fishing expedition in AZ and came up with nothing.

They were asked by whom?  Show me the details, not just your biased, uninformed opinion.