Protect democracy and the constitution.

Fear-mongering.

Nothing else to offer.

Fear-mongering.

Nothing else to offer.

Are you fearful of what Trump has told you he will do? Are you fearful he will terminate the Constitution as he promised?

Dan Coats a lifelong Republican and the Director of National Intelligence under Trump believes that Trump is a Russian asset and being blackmailed by Putin. Now Elon Musk has been meeting with Putin to discuss foreign policy if Trump wins. These are facts.

Check his resume: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Coats

please show me where trump said he would terminate the constitution...

Are you fearful of what Trump has told you he will do? Are you fearful he will terminate the Constitution as he promised?

Dan Coats a lifelong Republican and the Director of National Intelligence under Trump believes that Trump is a Russian asset and being blackmailed by Putin. Now Elon Musk has been meeting with Putin to discuss foreign policy if Trump wins. These are facts.

Check his resume: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Coats

Russia, Russia, Russia...

Are you fearful of what Trump has told you he will do? Are you fearful he will terminate the Constitution as he promised?

Dan Coats a lifelong Republican and the Director of National Intelligence under Trump believes that Trump is a Russian asset and being blackmailed by Putin. Now Elon Musk has been meeting with Putin to discuss foreign policy if Trump wins. These are facts.

Check his resume: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Coats

Democrats getting desperate.

I for one am not afraid of a Trump victory.  All this fear mongering makes me laugh.

One thing I do fear, though.  I fear for the former and quite possibly the new President's life.

Thanks to the deplorables in the first sentence above and their rhetoric the past few days as we get closer to the inevitable.

And here's the good ole Russia again. It worked with low IQ individuals the 1st time, why not use it again right?

Are you fearful of what Trump has told you he will do? Are you fearful he will terminate the Constitution as he promised?

Dan Coats a lifelong Republican and the Director of National Intelligence under Trump believes that Trump is a Russian asset and being blackmailed by Putin. Now Elon Musk has been meeting with Putin to discuss foreign policy if Trump wins. These are facts.

Check his resume: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Coats

I pray for a Trump landslide, so there will be no doubt the country at large rejects the "woke" agenda of the Left and the lawfare tactics of the Democrats.

I don't care what any intelligence agency director thinks or says.  I've worked in the intelligence field my whole career.  That's all I can say about it.

I know better than to take political advice from anyone who thought it was the right thing to LIE to the Commander in Chief about US force numbers deployed to Afghanistan and Syria.  That's treasonous.

Are you fearful of what Trump has told you he will do? Are you fearful he will terminate the Constitution as he promised?

Dan Coats a lifelong Republican and the Director of National Intelligence under Trump believes that Trump is a Russian asset and being blackmailed by Putin. Now Elon Musk has been meeting with Putin to discuss foreign policy if Trump wins. These are facts.

Check his resume: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Coats

Yeah cuz Wikipedia is a credible source. Original sources are hardly reliable and page authors and editors are sketchy at best. See below revision record.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dan_Coats&action=history


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah cuz Wikipedia is a credible source. Original sources are hardly reliable and page authors and editors are sketchy at best. See below revision record.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dan_Coats&action=history


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

At UH (manoa), the first thing we're told when doing a paper is we cannot use Wikipedia as a source.

At UH (manoa), the first thing we're told when doing a paper is we cannot use Wikipedia as a source.

Rightfully so . Especially now days, I notice that a lot of political pages on the site are replacing neutral wording and sources with politically bias sources. In order for you to post on Wikipedia you need to source reference material, but using magazines and political opinion pieces are hardly credible sources. So I assume that is how “activists” are getting around it. It seems that Wikipedia also uses a Reddit/quora style review process so it’s likely coordinated upvotes on politically bias revisions is what’s keeping the activist changes there. Just my assumptions based on my observations.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rightfully so . Especially now days, I notice that a lot of political pages on the site are replacing neutral wording and sources with politically bias sources. In order for you to post on Wikipedia you need to source reference material, but using magazines and political opinion pieces are hardly credible sources. So I assume that is how “activists” are getting around it. It seems that Wikipedia also uses a Reddit/quora style review process so it’s likely coordinated upvotes on politically bias revisions is what’s keeping the activist changes there. Just my assumptions based on my observations.

if I use Wikipedia for anything other than curiosity, i'll read the sources the article cites, and I'll often visit those sources to see what they say within context.

I find Wiki a convenient starting point, but I'll rarely ague that Wikipedia is the gospel on anything.

Trust, but verify!

if I use Wikipedia for anything other than curiosity, i'll read the sources the article cites, and I'll often visit those sources to see what they say within context.

I find Wiki a convenient starting point, but I'll rarely ague that Wikipedia is the gospel on anything.

Trust, but verify!

Wikipedia is also good for entertainment. U can click on 1 topic and more topics relate. Like say you search M16 and then 5.56mm would be able to click to search as well without having to type it in. Or Eugene Stoner, US Army, etc...

When I was at my old job, we had a lot of downtime, so I was on it a lot. Until IT blocked it, but we found out how to get around the "proxy setting". Then they figured that out and we were totally blocked.

Here is another credible source also sitting on a lounge chair with a microphone.

Whatever the democrats accuse us of is what they are either actively planning or already guilty of.

It doesn’t take a genius to recognize the pattern.

Apparently their thought crime internment camps were just about to open for us.

If you want the Bio of the 40 year Republican and Director of National Intelligence that believes Trump to be a Russian agent. You can also find it here:

Dan Coats
https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/C000542

Dan Coats is a Neocon, his political alignment is closer aligned with the Bushes and the Cheneys and even Obama and Biden than other republicans. He has a lot of motive to oppose Trump. It seems that for now the Republican Party is moving away from Neo-conservatism.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you want the Bio of the 40 year Republican and Director of National Intelligence that believes Trump to be a Russian agent. You can also find it here:

Dan Coats
https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/C000542

Trump was ousted because he was draining the Swamp.

The swamp critters are from all political affiliations, so advertising Coates as a Republican is a ridiculous argument.  Unlike Democrats, Republicans are not blindly loyal to the party they joined.

You also can’t take the criticisms of people who were removed from of his administration seriously because many of them were plants by other politicians or bureaucrats. You kinda just gotta take it from the horses mouth and look at the record and not what people are saying.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you want the Bio of the 40 year Republican and Director of National Intelligence that believes Trump to be a Russian agent. You can also find it here:

Dan Coats
https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/C000542

Do you not believe Robert Muellers report?  Or are you talking about that Trump was not a Russian agent in 2016; but is as of right now?