I thought parking meters were supposed to be for commercial and retail districts so people have to move their cars after meters expire. Most cities prohibit feeding an expired or expiring meter because that circumvents the purpose -- making sure everyone has a chance to park, do their business, and vacate the spot for the next person.
Parking is a limited commodity, so limiting how long you can tie one up helps keep the flow going.
Putting meters in residential areas makes no sense.
If there is a high mixture of businesses sitting among mostly residential buildings, that's poor zoning. Have a few metered spots for the businesses, and remove them from the residential units.
They should also have times when metered parking is free, so businesses that are closed won't have metered stalls enforced all night long.
Just another money grab. I'm surprised they aren't increasing property taxes to add a per-car fee. A sort of parking meter on your own property. Justification: increase public transit ridership.
Yes it is mo money for government and it forces people into public transit. Many countries make it way too expensive for the average
citizen to own and operate a car. Our government will never admit it but this is the whole idea. Due to the high cost of living here many
have multiple jobs. Using public transportation to get to the next job can be difficult.
The city is in dire need of funds to feed the rail monstrosity. I recently read about how the city and Bishop estate are at odds on the
price of the land mauka of Dillingham, aka the mauka shift. The city claims that just a small portion will be needed to allow for the
relocation of utilities. I have no proof of this but I suspect they want a lot more land acquired thru imminent domain. I think they want
the whole enchalada. The area in question is from Bob's Barbecue to the Kapalama canal. I fear more land will be taken and given to
their developer friends. .