You want to win an argument with an overly literal and unrealistic reading of the law? Ok, you win.

Regardless, my initial comment about having a gun in a to go bag is not a violation of the law no matter how you try to read the statute because I would in fact head to a relatives house to stay.

You want to win an argument with an overly literal and unrealistic reading of the law? Ok, you win.

Regardless, my initial comment about having a gun in a to go bag is not a violation of the law no matter how you try to read the statute because I would in fact head to a relatives house to stay.

what is the definition of being wrong? is it a literal translation? words can have many meanings. He is an artist of the law.

so if your relatives that you were "in fact" headed to live in Kaneohe and you were stopped H1 headed west in Kapolei, how would you explain that to the officer?

Why would I drive west in Kapolei if I was headed to Kaneohe?

you said "By your logic if I have a heart attack on the way to a gun range and I drive to a hospital I will be committing a felony."
you didn't say "i will be charged with a felony"
i am not the one being unrealistic
you are very careful with your words all the time so as not to be wrong, then when proven wrong you cannot admit it...

Duh

Exactly

Reading is fundamental.  You missed the point of that post because you don't understand plain English.

If your car is on fire and I break your window to pull you out, would you say that I have broken the law? According to the wording of the criminal property damage statute I have but realistically no one would call that a crime. So if you want to go purely with the language of the law then sure, you are right, stopping at a hospital while on the way to a gun range would technically be committing a crime. I just figured we were having a realistic conversation.

If your car is on fire and I break your window to pull you out, would you say that I have broken the law? According to the wording of the criminal property damage statute I have but realistically no one would call that a crime. So if you want to go purely with the language of the law then sure, you are right, stopping at a hospital while on the way to a gun range would technically be committing a crime. I just figured we were having a realistic conversation.

Why would I drive west in Kapolei if I was headed to Kaneohe?

breaking the law is breaking the law
you said nothing about "realistically being a charged with a felony" you said "committing a felony"
once again, for someone who is always so careful with your words so as not to be wrong, it's pitiful that when you actually are wrong, you still try and deny it...

So you would say that I have committed a crime if I break your car window to pull you from a fire?

So you would say that I have committed a crime if I break your car window to pull you from a fire?

you wouldn't be since cops are always considered on the job...

What if the person was trying to commit suicide?  Could/would/can they want to press charges for a broken window?

Vs. you dragging someone out and they declined to press charges because you saved their life.

So yes, it can be a crime to break a car window and pull someone out of it if it were on fire.

Can you post the HRS that list the exclusion about property damage or a good Samaritan law about property damage exclusion?

You are being obtuse just to try and win an argument. This is pointless. 

Funny, I don't recall seeing an exemption for being a cop in the criminal property damage statutes...
You are avoiding the point of the question... Would you consider yourself a criminal if you broke a window to save someone from a burning car?