CA preventing residents from rebuilding (Read 9354 times)

eyeeatingfish

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #60 on: February 12, 2025, 10:55:45 AM »
thanks for finally admitting you are a cop...

I admitted nothing.

You avoided answering the question, does that mean you admitted I was right?

eyeeatingfish

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #61 on: February 12, 2025, 10:56:44 AM »

Hahhahaa, pot, kettle.

Thanks for giving up cause you know you're wrong.  Or are you going to keep digging?

Non sequitur. Giving up because it is pointless doesn't make me wrong or you right. Try again.... actually don't.

changemyoil66

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #62 on: February 12, 2025, 10:57:36 AM »
Non sequitur. Giving up because it is pointless doesn't make me wrong or you right. Try again.... actually don't.

Yet here you are, still replying. Hahahahaha you can't even do what you said.

macsak

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #63 on: February 12, 2025, 10:59:14 AM »
lul

i answered the first question...

I admitted nothing.

You avoided answering the question, does that mean you admitted I was right?

eyeeatingfish

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #64 on: February 12, 2025, 11:00:21 AM »
lul

i answered the first question...

So you would consider yourself a criminal if you broke a window to save someone from a burning fire?

macsak

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #65 on: February 12, 2025, 11:11:31 AM »
no...

So you would consider yourself a criminal if you broke a window to save someone from a burning fire?

Flapp_Jackson

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #66 on: February 12, 2025, 11:18:28 AM »
So you would consider yourself a criminal if you broke a window to save someone from a burning fire?

Are you saying I can determine whether or not I broke the law aside from what anyone else thinks? 

Nice to know that whatever I consider myself is more important than what a prosecutor would think.

Cool!   :geekdanc:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #67 on: February 13, 2025, 08:07:59 AM »
You really think stopping your car after fleeing your burning home to do a head count and make sure no one is hurt is going to be a charge of illegally carrying a firearm?

By your logic if I have a heart attack on the way to a gun range and I drive to a hospital I will be committing a felony.  :crazy:

You sound like the HPD LT. who was at the hearing yesterday about places to keep gun parts.  He said something like "do you really think if someone is carrying a spring (gun spring) that they will be charged?" Eventhough, that's what the bill says. Same guy also said that carrying a lower receiver cannot be charged with places to keep.  So I guess one can buy a gun from a gun store and as long as they disassemble it in some manner so the gun cannot fire, they no longer have to go straight home.  Same with going to and from the range, now you can stop and get lunch and leave the gun in the car.

I question this Lt. knowledge of the law and the DLE acting chief's one as well.  Good thing the internet is forever and one can use this as a defense to violating places to keep.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #68 on: February 13, 2025, 12:32:36 PM »
You sound like the HPD LT. who was at the hearing yesterday about places to keep gun parts.  He said something like "do you really think if someone is carrying a spring (gun spring) that they will be charged?" Eventhough, that's what the bill says. Same guy also said that carrying a lower receiver cannot be charged with places to keep.  So I guess one can buy a gun from a gun store and as long as they disassemble it in some manner so the gun cannot fire, they no longer have to go straight home.  Same with going to and from the range, now you can stop and get lunch and leave the gun in the car.

I question this Lt. knowledge of the law and the DLE acting chief's one as well.  Good thing the internet is forever and one can use this as a defense to violating places to keep.

Yep.  Claiming a law is not going to be enforced should not be an argument for passing that law (or keeping it), but rather demonstrates they are wasting our time and money passing laws that will do nothing for public safety.  It would only allow for prosecutors to add more charges after someone is arrested for real, enforced crimes.

It's not up to the public to know if a law is enforced.  We are supposed to follow all laws.  Laws that are not enforced should be repealed.

Trump was tried and convicted of violating laws that no other developer in NYC has ever been accused of.  So the theory that a law "will not be enforced" is more wishful thinking than truth.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #69 on: February 19, 2025, 09:55:37 AM »
no...

Me neither, but under the letter of the law you would have broken the law. Just saying.

macsak

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #70 on: February 19, 2025, 10:36:50 AM »
Me neither, but under the letter of the law you would have broken the law. Just saying.

please show me where i said i didn't break he law...

eyeeatingfish

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #71 on: February 26, 2025, 12:42:37 PM »
please show me where i said i didn't break he law...

I asked if you would consider yourself a criminal and you said no. If you broke the law are you not a criminal?

macsak

Re: CA preventing residents from rebuilding
« Reply #72 on: February 26, 2025, 12:49:39 PM »
Criminal is an adjective that means relating to, involving, or being a crime. It can also be used as a noun to refer to a person who is guilty of a crime.

I asked if you would consider yourself a criminal and you said no. If you broke the law are you not a criminal?