So in 1 post you said that he shouldn't attend the Super Bowl. Then when I called you out on it, you said "that's not what I said". Now you repeat how the money was wasted, which means he shouldn't attend the Super Bowl.

This is what happens when you don't just admit that you were wrong when you said he shouldn't attend the SB.

More lies. You conflate "shouldn't" with "not be allowed"

Look up the definitions of those words and come back when you understand the difference.

More lies. You conflate "shouldn't" with "not be allowed"

Look up the definitions of those words and come back when you understand the difference.

Nice trying to move goal post.

You still didn't reply to what sporting events if any are allowed or what other types of activites should the POTUS be allowed to go to.

Nice trying to move goal post.

You still didn't reply to what sporting events if any are allowed or what other types of activites should the POTUS be allowed to go to.

Show me where I said a president shouldn't be "allowed" to go.

Show me where I said a president shouldn't be "allowed" to go.

I already did.  See what happens when you don't admit things, you forget how to keep the story straight.

I already did.  See what happens when you don't admit things, you forget how to keep the story straight.

Wrong. I never said Trump shouldn't have been allowed, I only said he shouldn't have gone.

Wrong. I never said Trump shouldn't have been allowed, I only said he shouldn't have gone.

either you failed to re-read the posting or you refuse to admit that you're wrong again.

Past few days the fake news has been spewing Trump will cut medicade.  He is stopping the fraudulent money going out, not reducing benefits.  He even stated this in interviews.  Jill Tokuda also spoke about this lie spewing.  And she wore pink to the State of the Union address, when she voted to keep men in womens sports. She also had some constitutional things written on her coat.  Barf.

either you failed to re-read the posting or you refuse to admit that you're wrong again.

Link the post where I said allowed because so far you haven't quoted me saying Trump shouldn't be allowed to go.

Link the post where I said allowed because so far you haven't quoted me saying Trump shouldn't be allowed to go.

Re-read.

So you went from asking for proof, even though I already posted it. And now this statement, which means you didn't read the first time I posted to re-read.  Thanks for playing.

BTW, re-read it again.

Pro-Hamas leader who graduated from Columbia University and is a permanent resident alien is in the process of being deported.  His status is being revoked and the fake news is saying his 1A right is being taken away.  Even though his coordinated "protest" are not peaceful.  They ban other students from attending classes or buildings. 

I talked to a guy who's the same resident status and asked if he would ever join a militia as some think the 2a relates only to militias.  So joining 1 would allow him to have the 2a right.  He said he cannot because it could be looked at as going against the government, which is not allowed for a permanent resident alien.  And he could be deported.

Re-read.

So you went from asking for proof, even though I already posted it. And now this statement, which means you didn't read the first time I posted to re-read.  Thanks for playing.

BTW, re-read it again.

Wrong. I am calling you out because you didn't post it because I didn't say it. I can't re-read something that doesn't exist. 

Pro-Hamas leader who graduated from Columbia University and is a permanent resident alien is in the process of being deported.  His status is being revoked and the fake news is saying his 1A right is being taken away.  Even though his coordinated "protest" are not peaceful.  They ban other students from attending classes or buildings. 

I talked to a guy who's the same resident status and asked if he would ever join a militia as some think the 2a relates only to militias.  So joining 1 would allow him to have the 2a right.  He said he cannot because it could be looked at as going against the government, which is not allowed for a permanent resident alien.  And he could be deported.

This is a very sticky case that I think has a good chance at going all the way to the supreme court because it walks right up to the line in terms of government blocking free speech. I hope the government has a very strong case with good evidence otherwise this really looks like a president trying to dictate the speech of immigrants.

Wrong. I am calling you out because you didn't post it because I didn't say it. I can't re-read something that doesn't exist. 

Nice try, you sound like KJP. THe more you think you say something doesn't make it true.

This is a very sticky case that I think has a good chance at going all the way to the supreme court because it walks right up to the line in terms of government blocking free speech. I hope the government has a very strong case with good evidence otherwise this really looks like a president trying to dictate the speech of immigrants.

Google the protest and watch the vids.  Then re-read what I posted.

i'll take an actual lawyer's opinion over that of a cop...

This is a very sticky case that I think has a good chance at going all the way to the supreme court because it walks right up to the line in terms of government blocking free speech. I hope the government has a very strong case with good evidence otherwise this really looks like a president trying to dictate the speech of immigrants.

i'll take an actual lawyer's opinion over that of a cop...

This isn't good enough for EEF.  He wants something in writing, case notes, examples, and still won't believe you.

Google the protest and watch the vids.  Then re-read what I posted.

Not doing your homework for you.

i'll take an actual lawyer's opinion over that of a cop...

JD Vance's used to have more credibility on constitutional issues but now under Trump he is forgetting what he used to stand for.

JD Vance's used to have more credibility on constitutional issues but now under Trump he is forgetting what he used to stand for.

Based on what specific facts?

You're always quick to state an opinion, but short on reasoning and justification.

Based on what specific facts?

You're always quick to state an opinion, but short on reasoning and justification.

JD Vance has used words like Idiot and Hitler to describe Trump in the past.
He said “Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”

Now he sings Trump's praises....

But specifically to answer your question, here is one example.

“Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive branch’s legitimate power,”

I could be wrong though, maybe he never had credibility on constitutional issues