It now looks like Comey ran an off the books honey pot scheme against Trump.
Shades of the CCP. Is there anything beneath these people.

Anyone with the ability to use logical thinking knows that Trumps the most investigated politician in history and is clean.

Anyone with the ability to use logical thinking knows that Trumps the most investigated politician in history and is clean.

Yes you would think people would understand it, but not everyone on this site will agree.
These people believe that Trump is a monster and therefore Frankenstein must be destroyed.

This sounds more like Patel being Trump's attack dog for anyone that dared challenge Trump. I don't trust Patel to do good unbiased law enforcement.

This sounds more like Patel being Trump's attack dog for anyone that dared challenge Trump. I don't trust Patel to do good unbiased law enforcement.

We've had detailed threads about the reasons. I suggest you go back and read them all in full.

This sounds more like Patel being Trump's attack dog for anyone that dared challenge Trump. I don't trust Patel to do good unbiased law enforcement.

i'm sure ka$h is very hurt by that fact...

This sounds more like Patel being Trump's attack dog for anyone that dared challenge Trump. I don't trust Patel to do good unbiased law enforcement.

"Sounds more like" is not an argument.  That's just your feeling and contrary characterization.

The DOJ was the attack dog for years under Obama and Biden.  Patel is the Humane Society come to put that vicious beast down to protect us all.

We've had detailed threads about the reasons. I suggest you go back and read them all in full.

Why? Am I not allowed to have reasons if they weren't included in previous conversations had by others?

"Sounds more like" is not an argument.  That's just your feeling and contrary characterization.

The DOJ was the attack dog for years under Obama and Biden.  Patel is the Humane Society come to put that vicious beast down to protect us all.

So if I see smoke and I say it looks like there may be a fire you are going to whine and say those are my feelings?

I am not saying the DOJ has been perfect by any means but Trump has you guys believing he is like Jesus and the DOJ is like the pharisees. There absolutely have been political attacks against him but he is by no means innocent and his behavior as president show that he doesn't care about draining the swamp, he just wants the alligators in the swamp to be his. (Switched from dogs to alligators because it fits the swamp analogy) Kash is a perfect example of this, so is the case with Eric Adams

So if I see smoke and I say it looks like there may be a fire you are going to whine and say those are my feelings?

I am not saying the DOJ has been perfect by any means but Trump has you guys believing he is like Jesus and the DOJ is like the pharisees. There absolutely have been political attacks against him but he is by no means innocent and his behavior as president show that he doesn't care about draining the swamp, he just wants the alligators in the swamp to be his. (Switched from dogs to alligators because it fits the swamp analogy) Kash is a perfect example of this, so is the case with Eric Adams

If you see see smoke and say there's a fire, it's a general comment.  Saying there's a fire is a general deduction -- you aren't saying what's on fire or where the fire is.

Your specific comment was "This sounds more like Patel being Trump's attack dog for anyone that dared challenge Trump. I don't trust Patel to do good unbiased law enforcement."

You were not speaking in general terms.  We all know what you're doing.  Pretending it's the same as a hypothetical when it's not even close doesn't help your argument.

It's not even March, and already you think you know what every Trump appointee is doing, why they are doing it, and how it's not the right way to do it.

TDS is blinding you.

Why? Am I not allowed to have reasons if they weren't included in previous conversations had by others?

Name them then.

So if I see smoke and I say it looks like there may be a fire you are going to whine and say those are my feelings?

I am not saying the DOJ has been perfect by any means but Trump has you guys believing he is like Jesus and the DOJ is like the pharisees. There absolutely have been political attacks against him but he is by no means innocent and his behavior as president show that he doesn't care about draining the swamp, he just wants the alligators in the swamp to be his. (Switched from dogs to alligators because it fits the swamp analogy) Kash is a perfect example of this, so is the case with Eric Adams

Again, read the prior threads about this since you stated "by no means innocent".  If you listened the first time, you would realize that this comment doesn't follow logic.  I mean, unless you like to go by feelings instead, then it's all G.  Continue to feel how orangeman hurt you.

The song Feelings -- a good blast from the past.

"Feelings, nothing more than feelings"

so much winning!  and it's only been one month.

The thing about Comey is he admitted he treated Trump differently.  He tried to trip the President-elect up in his initial meetings to gather evidence against him.  He also decided to not give Trump the required briefings alerting him to the fact he was a target of foreign disinformation.  The FBI spied on Trump's campaign which continued into the Trump administration using as justification a dossier that had by January been debunked as opposition material gathered by the Clinton campaign.  Comey admitted after leaving the FBI that had he known everything about the dossier and who paid for it, he never would have approved the FISA warrant applications that gave him the authority to spy on Trump and his people.

Seems like he just didn't want to know, even after agents were caught sending anti-Trump messages to each other claiming they would stop him, and after a lawyer admitted to falsifying reports saying Carter Page was not working as a US INTEL asset.  There was enough "there" there to at least suspect that the Russia Collusion hoax should no longer be used to abuse the FISA process.

He knew.  He didn't get to be the head of the FBI by being gullible and stupid.  He wanted Hillary to win, and when Trump won, the priority was to make sure he couldn't effectively govern.  So many wrongs going on during Trump's first term, and Comey's actions were among the worst.

If you see see smoke and say there's a fire, it's a general comment.  Saying there's a fire is a general deduction -- you aren't saying what's on fire or where the fire is.

Your specific comment was "This sounds more like Patel being Trump's attack dog for anyone that dared challenge Trump. I don't trust Patel to do good unbiased law enforcement."

You were not speaking in general terms.  We all know what you're doing.  Pretending it's the same as a hypothetical when it's not even close doesn't help your argument.

It's not even March, and already you think you know what every Trump appointee is doing, why they are doing it, and how it's not the right way to do it.

TDS is blinding you.

Distinction without a difference. Patel isn't a one off case here, Trump has a pattern of picking people who are loyal to him, not loyal to the country. Trump is filling the swamp with his own alligators that will do his bidding. Trump also gets rid of the ones who choose to be loyal to the country rather than him.

Patel published a political enemies list that names those who Trump doesn't like. That is not the behavior you want from the head of the FBI, that is the behavior you expect from someone picked by a dictator.

Being in a Trump cult is blinding you.

Again, read the prior threads about this since you stated "by no means innocent".  If you listened the first time, you would realize that this comment doesn't follow logic.  I mean, unless you like to go by feelings instead, then it's all G.  Continue to feel how orangeman hurt you.

Swoosh

Distinction without a difference. Patel isn't a one off case here, Trump has a pattern of picking people who are loyal to him, not loyal to the country. Trump is filling the swamp with his own alligators that will do his bidding. Trump also gets rid of the ones who choose to be loyal to the country rather than him.

Patel published a political enemies list that names those who Trump doesn't like. That is not the behavior you want from the head of the FBI, that is the behavior you expect from someone picked by a dictator.

Being in a Trump cult is blinding you.

Ever hear of the Transitive Property of Equality?  If A = B, and B = C, then A = C. 

So, if Trump is focused on making America great again (America first), and his appointees are focused on following Trump (what you call loyalists), then the appointees are also focused on making America great again.

I really don't see a problem since Trump is not planning to remain President indefinitely.

The only cult is the group that can't see the positive because they only believe the negative lies.

Ever hear of the Transitive Property of Equality?  If A = B, and B = C, then A = C. 

So, if Trump is focused on making America great again (America first), and his appointees are focused on following Trump (what you call loyalists), then the appointees are also focused on making America great again.

I really don't see a problem since Trump is not planning to remain President indefinitely.

The only cult is the group that can't see the positive because they only believe the negative lies.

Wrong, I do see positive things in Trump's presidency. The securing of the border, pushing back against woke nonsense, pushing back against trans nonsense, cutting government waste.
However I don't let it blind me from the bad things he is saying and doing.

The transitive property only holds true if the premise is accurate.