Yeah, I don't think it's plausible that the former Director of the FBI has no clue what the term "86" means.

He deleted the post and apologized, but the fact that he posted it at all is a problem for him. 

He's been a partisan hack his whole career.  Nobody should be surprised at this.

He now claims that he "found" the numbers on the beach and didn't know what they meant. 

TBH, 86 means to kick out.  Had it said 187, then that's a diff story. 

So he's doing nothing different by him wanting Trump removed from office than he was doing with the Russia Hoax.

This doesn't meet muster for a criminal charge, not even close. I doubt this will go anywhere

This doesn't meet muster for a criminal charge, not even close. I doubt this will go anywhere

Neither did anything they charged Trump with, so in the spirit of fairness and objectivity…

This doesn't meet muster for a criminal charge, not even close. I doubt this will go anywhere

Comey should stay off social media if he's stupidly posting things he doesn't know the meaning of.  That's giving him the benefit of the doubt that he's not the one who arranged the shells -- a more plausible explanation than finding it on a walk.

Investigating Comey shows that our new DHS is serious about even the slightest threat against President Trump, as they should be.  Given the close calls he's had, all potential POTUS threats should be investigated no matter the chances of it "going anywhere."

It only takes one whacko to try again.  Posts like this encourages them.

Neither did anything they charged Trump with, so in the spirit of fairness and objectivity…

Except the 2 arrests and 34 convictions so...... (No I am not saying those were good cases)

Except the 2 arrests and 34 convictions so...... (No I am not saying those were good cases)

2 arrests?  He was arrested 4 times.  He was charged with 88 felony counts, including the 34 you mentioned.

Do you even know how a web search works?

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-investigations-other-charges-b8b064a00caad4306fb54d2f6a320468

https://people.com/donald-trump-every-criminal-charge-explained-7567024

Comey should stay off social media if he's stupidly posting things he doesn't know the meaning of.  That's giving him the benefit of the doubt that he's not the one who arranged the shells -- a more plausible explanation than finding it on a walk.

Investigating Comey shows that our new DHS is serious about even the slightest threat against President Trump, as they should be.  Given the close calls he's had, all potential POTUS threats should be investigated no matter the chances of it "going anywhere."

It only takes one whacko to try again.  Posts like this encourages them.

Trump should stay off social media instead of stupidly posting things as well but here we are.

Even if law enforcement could prove he arranged the shells it would still fall well within protected speech.

Not saying it was healthy speech or even very clever speech but it is protected speech. Is it enough to justify an investigation? Not by itself but could be part of justification if there was something else.

Trump should stay off social media instead of stupidly posting things as well but here we are.

Even if law enforcement could prove he arranged the shells it would still fall well within protected speech.

Not saying it was healthy speech or even very clever speech but it is protected speech. Is it enough to justify an investigation? Not by itself but could be part of justification if there was something else.

In other words, you're blaming Trump's mean words for assassins trying to kill him?

That's awfully objective of you.

Protected speech has exceptions, such as inciting violence.  Comey knows what he did.

If they can throw grannies in solitary for taking photos at the capitol, then Comey can face charges as well

Trump should stay off social media instead of stupidly posting things as well but here we are.

Even if law enforcement could prove he arranged the shells it would still fall well within protected speech.

Not saying it was healthy speech or even very clever speech but it is protected speech. Is it enough to justify an investigation? Not by itself but could be part of justification if there was something else.

So Trump should limit his speech and Comey is free to express himself. Too much TDS in your eye

The left showed that someone (Trump) can be charged, arrested, focused on for any little thing.  So what happens to Comey is no different.   They set the precedent.

So Trump should limit his speech and Comey is free to express himself. Too much TDS in your eye

He's quick to call out whataboutisms against everyone else here, but he believes his use of them constitutes an objective opinion.

Now that they are investigating him, imagine all the other stuff they could find in the process.

I thought intelligence officials were supposed to be intelligent. Apparently some of them are just political hacks.

https://www.kunstler.com/p/cool

lul
comey knew that "86" meant to kill someone...
https://youtu.be/QypMMSobtTg?si=anPaBX3tpi6MqB3k&t=120

2 arrests?  He was arrested 4 times.  He was charged with 88 felony counts, including the 34 you mentioned.

Do you even know how a web search works?

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-investigations-other-charges-b8b064a00caad4306fb54d2f6a320468

https://people.com/donald-trump-every-criminal-charge-explained-7567024

Touche

In other words, you're blaming Trump's mean words for assassins trying to kill him?

That's awfully objective of you.

Protected speech has exceptions, such as inciting violence.  Comey knows what he did.

I have no idea how even you could have derived that conclusion from my statement as it is completely devoid of any such comment.

Saying "Remove Trump" in code or in plain English would not be enough to establish incitement to violence given the common meaning of "86" to be removing someone from an establishment.

Touche

you misspelled "i was wrong"...

lul
comey knew that "86" meant to kill someone...
https://youtu.be/QypMMSobtTg?si=anPaBX3tpi6MqB3k&t=120

Ha. I knew Tulsi was on to something.

My natural instinct was to treat it like free speech

But then I remembered this is war, and what they will do to us if they are ever able to take power again