Fake news.  Photo is from the UK taken in April 2020.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/gimp-man-spotted-shopping-essentials-21902814

It’s called humor.

They are ALL gimps to me.

Only in America where we can ELECT a dictator....

Razor sharp point there!

However, if by some fluke one of them should grasp it, their head would explode.

joe biden did not become a full blown dictator.  Although he clearly aspired to be.

He was halfway to getting there as a dick.......then faltered and slinked slowly away into the swamp.

Biden was in government too, too long -- half a century!

That career gave him the arrogance and confidence to pretty much do whatever he wanted.  That's why so many of his orders were dragged into court with him losing most of them.  He didn't care, because it demonstrated to his cult members that he was trying to give them what they wanted.

He's a political animal, not so much a dictator.  He was the head of a crime family that benefitted from his government positions and contacts.  i could list half a dozen ways he and the family benefitted with just Hunter's corrupt dealings overseas, but they've been covered many times here.

i think he's more like Al Capone or Vito Corleone.  He's in it to get rich and maintain his and his family's life style.  Being the supreme leader was just a means to an end that didn't involve actually ruling.  Power comes in many forms, and for someone who's never had a real job, it often means wealth and financial independence.

they just made it...
https://www.kitv.com/news/local/common-kings-official-kick-off-for-oahus-first-holo-holo-music-festival/article_8ee988e7-c406-413a-a8e1-b626d917df06.html

Uh oh. Looks like someone ran out of NGO money.

We could be watching the Democrat party fizzle in front of our very eyes.


https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2025/10/18/no-dictators-protests-take-place-across-islands-mainland/

Uh oh. Looks like someone ran out of NGO money.

We could be watching the Democrat party fizzle in front of our very eyes.


https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2025/10/18/no-dictators-protests-take-place-across-islands-mainland/

Mari Matsuda, a retired law professor and lawyer, said, “For 40 years,
I taught students about the Constitution and Bill of Rights and our
obligation as citizens to support the rule of law, and everything that I
taught them is now being violated by our own government.”

Attendee Joseph Pugh said, “It’s not a Democrat, Republican thing, it’s
about people. It’s about protecting people. I’m here specifically about
ICE and all the ICE raids that I’ve seen.”

Really?  I wonder if Joseph ever took mari's classes on the Constitution?

The constItution Mari taught mandates that the federal government
protect the states -- i.e. the entire nation -- against foreign invasion.  That
means having the responsibility of controlling the borders, managing
immigration, and deporting foreigners who enter or remain in the country
illegally.  In fact, every state or city that establishes a "sanctuary" for illegal
aliens and/or tries to interfere by not notifying ICE of illegal detainees or
by not providing local law enforcement support and assistance is committing
a crime against the Constitution by obstructing the federal government's
efforts to protect them.

i think Liberal states have gotten so used to the feds washing their hands of
protecting against illegals that they've grown used to all the accommodations
and social welfare programs established to help them that any attempt to
disrupt their system of enabling illegal immigration seems like government
overreach to them.  It's the exact opposite.  Trump is not kicking the can further
down the road.  He's fixing the problem.

Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall
guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government,
and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the
legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened)
against domestic violence.

This was to guarantee that each state of the union was protected against
invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels and
uncontrolled (illegal) immigration.  If we cannot control our borders we
cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it's that simple.

https://danhappel.com/article-4-section-4-protecting-our-borders-under-the-u-s-constitution/

Well, in looking at the aftermath on local news, it appears that the Dems made a strategic blunder in holding their gay parade on the same day, and we got the answer to an interesting question about them:

Do Dems like dildos more than protesting imaginary dictators?

Hell yes!

My theory that they are all gimps has passed an important experimental milestone!

It’s called humor.

They are ALL gimps to me.

Right.

Ha ha.

 

As long you're entertained, carry on.

Right.

Ha ha.

 

As long you're entertained, carry on.

No worry - not immediately planning to start a separate

“Maybe Not all Dems are Gimps, but ALL Gimps ARE Dems”

thread - but if I do I’ll put it in its proper place under Off Topic.

Here's another violent Leftist who resorted to vandalism and firing shots at a home just for having a sign on his property supporting MAGA and Trump.

I can only assume he attended a No Kings protest over the weekend, possibly in DC, and was driving back home.  His home is 160 miles away from the site of the vandalism. 

He's an accountant, so maybe he thought the Ben Affleck movies are instruction videos.

 

Saw many signs from the "no kings" protest across the nation. #facepalm to majority of them.  I never understood how dumb people can be until 2016 to now.

Once the Dems have completely run out of relevancy we still have some huge problems ahead of us.

But it will be nice to not have to worry about gay communism any longer.

This is amazing. All those protestors lived! No mass incarcerations. They have no fear of a "king" coming after them! Awesome weekend to protest in America against an elected 'king'!

This is amazing. All those protestors lived! No mass incarcerations. They have no fear of a "king" coming after them! Awesome weekend to protest in America against an elected 'king'!

Or their protest worked.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Once the Dems have completely run out of relevancy we still have some huge problems ahead of us.

But it will be nice to not have to worry about gay communism any longer.

Diversity is their strength, he he

When did i ever say this:  "...it is ok to strike someone outside a rally..."

Did you get a chance to call an English tutor?  It could save us all a lot of time and angst.

I asked the question because you dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario.

I asked the question because you dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario.

Show me where i did dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario.  i'm trying to get you to understand the TOPIC, but you want to whataboutism me to death.

i assume i'll get the same nonresponse as i did to my last request.

 

Show me where i did dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario.  i'm trying to get you to understand the TOPIC, but you want to whataboutism me to death.

i assume i'll get the same nonresponse as i did to my last request.

 

I gave you multiple examples of violence by the right against the left and you dismissed them because they happened at a rally. Why does it matter that the political violence was at a rally or not? If it didn't matter then you wouldn't have brought it up.

I gave you multiple examples of violence by the right against the left and you dismissed them because they happened at a rally. Why does it matter that the political violence was at a rally or not? If it didn't matter then you wouldn't have brought it up.

I asked for examples within the SAME ENVIRONMENT/SETTING/CIRCUMSTANCES as the story I posted --

i.e. "Another example of the crazy antics from a Trump hater who attacked a man wearing a MAGA hat."

If you can't, you can't. 

In school, did you get full credit for putting anything you felt like on paper whether or not it answered the question asked?

That would explain everything.

I asked for examples within the SAME ENVIRONMENT/SETTING/CIRCUMSTANCES as the story I posted --

i.e. "Another example of the crazy antics from a Trump hater who attacked a man wearing a MAGA hat."

If you can't, you can't. 

In school, did you get full credit for putting anything you felt like on paper whether or not it answered the question asked?

That would explain everything.

Why does it have to be the same exact scenario, why can't you just admit there are crazy people on the right who engage in political violence too? Go read my initial reply in this thread, I never said anything about specific circumstances, I only argued that there was political violence on both sides and I provided videos when asked about it. Your only real rebuttal is a whataboutism basis that minimizes political violence if it doesn't occur within some set scenario you demand. Whether at a protest or just walking down the street, someone who attacks another because they are wearing the hat of an opponent is an unhinged emotional violent person.