Mayor, It is bad enough that you require all persons to get a permit to even buy a firearm. Now you are shortening the hours at the only Public(gov) owned shooting range. Remember Xerox, yes of course, everybody who lived on the island then does. The more trained law-abiding citizens that have the ability to defend themselves and others from deadly force the better off our society is. I wonder what exactly the C&C of Oahu are trying to accomplish by: 1, Restricting Practice time on the public range? 2, Interfering with the invidual God-Given Right to "Keep and Bear Arms"
Kaylorinhi Is/Was that too much or what, feed-back please.
Kaylorinhi,
Perhaps a little too strong for the sensitive political types.
Here is what I wrote:
Hours of Operation for Kokohead Shooting Complex.
The furlough days where one way to reduce operational costs of Kokohead Shooting Complex. The new reduced hours are unfair to the shooting public.
The original hours, in my view, where not satisfactory. Tuesday to Friday 12-3pm and Saturday and Sunday 8am-3pm is not enough range time for the amount
of people using this public facility. People living on the far side of the island, such as I, cannot use this facility during the afternoon hours on the weekdays. Because of Hawaii law and the rule of
my employment, I am unable to travel to Kokohead and return to my home to properly store my firearms, then report to work. The mileage and traffic make such a trip prohibitive. Therefore, I can only
safely practice on the weekends. With the new hours and very congested range, on the weekend, makes this trip more prohibited as well.
Perhaps the hours of 8am-3pm Wednesday-Sunday, with furlough Fridays, would be better, so that people who live far from that side of the island can have a chance to practice, in a safe
shooting environment.
Also, some have suggested that a nominal range fee of no more than $5.00 may be charged to help with upkeep and usage of the range. I, for one, feel our tax dollars are already paying
for this service, as these dollars also pay for the upkeep of other public parks and beaches, but I would not be opposed to such a fee provided that the funds are NOT redirected
to other city and county services and used solely for the purpose of upkeep and range service.
A reply to my concerns will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
I wanted to add some alternatives, and personal experience, instead of just ranting. Also, more coolheaded text is always more productive. It is a natural reflex for people to shut down and go one the defensive, if they feel threated or belittled. JMHO