Ruger GP100 6" vs S&W586 4"
not a real in depth analysis. i'm just shooting silhouettes. just my general impressions of each firearm
GP100 was made in 1990. only changes I made is the front fiber optic sight and Altamont grips which are a lot like the stock ones but have snakeskin checkering. have fired 700+ rounds thru this GP100, probable more
S&W is new. only change is the Altamont grips. stock grips were the coke bottle target grips.
don't really know which one is more accurate until I go target side
trigger i'll give an edge to the S&W. its lighter and shorter, after I fire more rounds through it I'm sure it'll smooth out more. the GP100 is heavy and long trigger pull in DA, but its smooth
sights i'll give to the Ruger. although I switched to fiber optics and I like that better to see. the Ruger is also much easier to replace the front sight, just push in this spring loaded tab and it comes out.
I like the looks of the S&W grips much better, but shooting I like the Ruger grips bc its rubber and I guess i'm just more used to shooting them. i'll have to try shoot the 586 with the coke bottle grips and see if I like it better.
the Ruger is built a little beefier. the top and front straps are bigger. which could be an advantage.
S&W is not as big. which could be an advantage.
I like the looks of the S&W better overall
which one is better?
i'm not sure. each one has its own strengths.
who's the winner? me, bc I get to shoot both!

in the video I shoot each gun 357 in SA, and 38sp in DA
