Byrd testified for a l full day over a 2 day period. We're just seeing 2 minutes.
Based on the newspaper account, Byrd admitted he didn't see the whole Deedy/Elderts encounter and didn't see Deedy show credentials, but couldn't say he didn't miss it.
Elderts dropped Deedy before he pulled his gun, so he certainly didn't shoot Elderts before he took a swing. He pulled his gun on the second go round.
It's like Fun keeps saying ( and some others ). Was he in fear for his life or serious bodily harm when the shots were fired ?
Sounds like Elderts was on him.
Also sounds like KKs "french army" theory that no one goes toward a gunman when shots are fired is out the window.

( Just causing trouble in good fun )
Witness testifies that Elderts was trying to control Deedy's hands/wrists after first shot fired.
Deeedy cetainly could have felt that he was trying to be overpowered and have his gun taken away. ( and possibly shoved up his ass. Am I allowed to say ass ? )
Which Elderts was probably trying to do to save his own life as shots already fired. To get the gun away, not necessarily, but possibly, to shove it up Deedy's ass,
Was Deedy drunk ? No intoxication tests but so far a lot of prosecution circumstantial evidence witnesses, including HPD.
Defense will probably have their own witnesses saying Deedy had one beer. ( Deedy's friends )
Did he act in a reasonable manner ?
defense blocking all witness opinions of was it reasonable/necessary to pull out a gun as witnesses are not experts.
They're trying to get their own expert to testify about this.
Legally and assholey this is 2 different discussions.