[8/12/2013 update] Partial transcript of Day 2 PM Deedy testimony. Deedy testimony resumes.
video timestamp:
2:54:40 view 4 (side overflow dining view): Deedy partially visible at left of video.
2:54:41: Deedy sitting down on seat. said he sat there about 1/2 hour area but stood from seat from time to time.
2:54:56: Officer Naki asked Deedy some questions. Deedy gave Naki his biodata info (name, dob, address, employer) limited to this as he is trained. He is trained that he will be detained and should only give biodata info and nothing more until an agency representative is available. Said that he works for the US Department of State as a special agent.
3:07:29: Deedy still sitting and approached by Officer Aiu.
3:08:43: Deedy stood per Aiu's instructions to take pictures of Deedy. Aiu is off the camera. Aiu took photos of Deedy at different distances. Took pictures of whole body perspective and directly in front of face.
3:09:23: Sgt Shriner next to counter where Deedys items were, Officer Aiu next to Deedy. Deedy mentioned he had other side interactions with the officers, requesting being able to contact his agency. Officers told him he will be going to the hospital first due to his injury. Prior to this, his hands were bagged, then they left and went to the hospital. Deedy was at the side dining area for about 1/2 hour.
Deedy walked with officers out of entrance, to a cruiser parked in front and went to Queens MC.
Deedy recalls hearing the officer asking another officer on the radio if Deedy was being charged for a crime yet. And the response that he was being arrested for murder.
Deedy describes how he felt: "It felt like a ton of bricks fell on my chest. After being in a fight for my life, now I am being charged with murder, it was not a good place."
After arriving, Officer Osaka took him inside QMC ER. He saw Adam Gutawski as soon as he entered. Adam walked by Deedy and said something like "Are you okay?" Adam said something like "that guy got me." The officer told him to stop talking and moved Adam on. Deedy was seen by a nurse after, the nurse that testified a couple of days ago. Took Deedys biodata, checked his vitals and asked him a series of questions.
She was asking questions while checking his vitals. He was trying to wrap his head around what was going on. Trying to compose himself and be cooperative. Not giving any info about what happened. He didn't want to give any info because he was trained not to give any info about a use of force incident after being in one. You may not recall everything right away, you may give inaccurate info, your mind may need time to process everything after. He was trained not to give anything or submit to any tests until an agency representative was there.
After being seen by the nurse, the evidence technician began taking info from him. She had a form and was asking biodata and other questions "what were your hobbies?" "how many shots did you fire that night?" He refused to answer that it wasn't necessary and it wasn't biodata. Why don't you just tell me what it is. He said "running and biking". When she asked about the shots,
He was told to remove his clothing. The paper bags were removed. He removed his clothing and was asked to remove his underwear. "Was this totally necessary that I do this at this moment?" Female technician said yes. From his experience, it was not standard practice as she was a female. Standard practice was that a male officer would be there instead and he would be provided clothes to wear. They didn't provide him anything to wear so he did as she ordered and he stood there naked. First he got scrubs for his bottom half, then later got a paper suit to wear before he left. He asked if he could use the restroom and if he could was his hands and face because he was covered in blood. And freaking out about what he just went through. He was covered in blood -- hands, feet, clothes.
The evidence technician took photographs. When he finished, the officer let him use the restroom, relieved himself, washed his hands and face, then went to the police station where he was booked. Took his wedding ring. Prior to going to PD, they removed most of his personal belongings at MCDonalds. Deedy mentioned about the religious pendant he wore which was removed at McDonalds. Clothing and watch removed at hospital. Gave his wedding ring prior to arriving at the police station.
They verified his biodata info, fingerprint, mugshot, then sat down. Turned on the intoxilizer then handed the tube. Intoxilizer to measure blood alcohol content. He didn't want to submit to anything other than medical treatment. "I cannot submit to any tests or make any statements until I have an agent representative or legal counsel with me."
Phone call sign "your phonecalls are being recorded". He wanted to talk to his wife, but they don't have a landline. Called his father to instruct him to call his wife, to inform one of his agent friends and immediately call Command Center and have them contact HPD about him. He was then taken to his cell.
He stayed in his cell for an undetermined number of time. No clocks. Lights are always on at night. Before this, he recalls being brought to another area of the cell block where a technician was taking more evidence including nail scrapings. Another evidence specialist didn't take any tests but just chatted with him.
At this point, the KITV video kept pausing and buffering so I missed a big chunk of the testimony including the end of defense witness and the beginning of prosecution witness:
- Interactions with technician and being returned to his cell.
- Taken to their office, "hey would you like to make a statement while you're with us?" "Yes, I would like to make a statement. Has my agency been in contact?"
- end of defense witness.
- beginning of prosecution witness.
- something about Deedy's Dec 2009 purchases, department policies.
- taking a break and video going offline.
Prosecution witness:
- Deedy testified that he doesn't know how much his companions drank. He didn't know how much Adam or Jessica drank. Deedy confirmed he drank 4 drinks, and about his self-imposed limitation to 4 drinks in the event he is carrying his firearm or driving.
- Prosecution talked about expert witness testimony that being under the influence can diminish one's ability to process information, hand eye coordination, and judgement. "yes, that's what he said."
- Asked about carrying a gun and drinking, whether it is a violation. "If I'm on duty, that's correct."
- Did you hear Gutawski joking with the cashier? Did I hear them? I saw them joking with them.
- I saw him interacting with other customers, yes.
- Did you see Adam acting goofy? "Yes, that is Adam's usual demeanor. He is a really goofy guy."
- "I did not see when he went into McDonalds. We walked past McDonalds, realized that he wasn't with us. Gave him a minute to see if he would come back out."
At about 2:15pm, they watched the video again - view 2 (cashier) starting at video timestamp 2:36:07.
Format is: Prosecution asks, Deedy answers.
2:38:31: You heard Elderts while he was at the counter? He had a loud voice. I wasn't sure exactly what he was doing. I don't recall hearing Shane Medeiros voice while they were at the counter. There was a conversation going on at the counter. Elderts was the loudest. I didn't hear what everyone said, I could see that they were talking. He could not hear what the cashier was saying.
I could hear the voices of all the group. I could not make out the individual voices except for Mr Elderts, he was the loudest. I did hear a female voice.
Did you notice them when they first walked in? Yes, I first noticed them when they were walking up the isle. Until this point in time (2:38:31), no crime has been committed, correct? I don't believe so.
Watching video of Elderts talking with Perrine at the counter.
2:39:34: Have you heard Elderts having a verbal exchange with Perrine, right? I did.
Described by cashier as joking, correct? I heard her testimony. Well I heard him say something like "leave me alone."
Was it before or after this frame that Perrine said "cut it out."? I don't know at what point. They were already interacting. I saw Perrine turn to Elderts and say "hey just leave me alone."
2:40:07: Elderts had gone to sit down at the table. Perrine is on his way. Jessica west is leaving by the front door? I don't see her in the frame but I thnk she's over there.
Adam is by the trash bin doing something in preparation to leaving. At this time, you, Adam and Jessica were getting ready to go to Nashville. After you heard Perrine tell Elderts to stop, he stopped didn't he? No ma'am. He kept on with Mr Perrine on the counter? After he said it, Mr Elderts turned from the counter. Right about here, is where Mr. Elderts directed something to Mr. Perrine.
Mr Elderts said something like "what's your fking problem? you want beef?" He used the word beef? Yes, I know the word "beef".
And Mr Perrine ignored Mr Elderts correct? He turned away.
And he didn't say anything to Mr Elderts? No, he didn't.
Did he say anything to anybody after that? I did not hear him say anything after that.
You testified that he seemed out of it after that, correct? Yes ma'am.
So basically, he wasn't being bothered by anything after that as far as you could see? No ma'am that's not correct.
After this, what was he bothered by? When I saw him at the counter and heard him ask to be left alone, and then I saw Mr Elderts again turn to Mr Perrine and say something, I saw that Mr Perrine didn't respond. And to me it looked intentional. Like he was purposely not trying to respond. Prosecution claims that answer is speculation.
After you heard Elderts say to Mr. Perrine, you want beef. I don't recall exactly. "Do you want beef, something like that."
After that conversation, Mr Perrine had no further interaction with Mr Elderts that you saw, correct? That is correct.
2:40:13: Deedy walking towards Elderts' table. Deedy had previously stood up and took notice.
At this time, no crime had been committed, correct? That is correct.
The only thing that you head from Mr. Elderts was a verbal remark to Mr. Perrine, correct? What I heard was an aggressive verbal threat.
And Mr. Perrine's reaction to that aggressive verbal threat was to look away? I don't know what was in his mind, but he immediately turned away and looked the other direction.
But he did not engage Mr Elderts, correct? That is correct.
And Mr. Elderts did not continue to engage Mr. Perrine, did he? He wasn't saying anything, but he was engaging him.
Mr. Elderts was engaging him? That is correct.
By the time, you got up and was walking over, no crime had been committed? No crime had been committed at this point.
And at this time, Shane Mederios was still at the counter, correct? That is correct.
And did you hear Medeiros, engaging in any way with Mr. Perrine. I don't believe so.
2:40:23 front dining view: Were you saying anything to Mr. Elderts? I can see where Mr. Elderts was turned from Mr. Perrine previously, and I am looking at his direction. This is about when I was speaking to him.
Adam Gutawski was waving goodbye to somebody and was on his way out.
What are you saying to Mr. Elderts? I walked up to Mr. Elderts and said, "What's going on here?"
Elderts and Deedy did not know each other at this point.
At this point, Elderts had done nothing illegal? I don't believe was breaking any law.
At this time, it appeared that Elderts was ignoring Perrine, correct? It appeared to me that Perrine was trying hard to ignore him.
You heard Perrine's testimony that it was no big deal, what was happening between him and Mr. Elderts correct? I heard all of Mr. Perrine's testimony. And he also said he doesn't remember any of the interaction, except being called a haole.
But he remembers not being bothered by it correct? That's his recollection in his testimony.
And that he could handle the situation by himself. I believe he said that yes.
And in fact, that was what he was doing sitting there ignoring Mr. Elderts, correct? I don't believe so.
So you went up to this person that you didn't know and ask him what was happening, correct? That is correct.
And Kollin's response to you was what? I don't know what his response to me or if he responded to me at that moment.
2:48:27: At this point in time, you have turned your back on Kollin Elderts, correct? And since you turned your back on him, you no longer consider him a threat? No, that's not correct.
Would you consider him to be threatening at that time? He had not threatened me.
And your direction is to Mederios. Correct. That is because of what he was saying to Mr. Perrine? Yes that's correct.
And what did you say to Shane Medeiros? In response to Medeiros, I first said something to Mr. Perrine, And I said "Are you okay?"
And you received no response? I received a response from Mr. Medeiros. I asked a question, and immediately received a response from Mr. Medeiros.
And, you received no response from Mr. Perrine? If he responded, I did not hear it.
You said Mr. Medeiros said something back to you in response. And you continued a conversation with Medeiros? That is correct.
2:40:31: This is when Ms. Soriano comes up to you and Medeiros in front of Medeiros' table. She's telling you "don't make trouble. if you're gonna make trouble, leave." is that correct? Yes, she said something like that.
You said Shane Medeiros and Collin Elderts ignored her correct? I don't recall in my testimony of their response to her.
But your response was to ignore her, correct? I don't believe we said ... we weren't ignoring her. I turned to Medeiros and said "She's right. There's no need to cause problems here." or something along that line. I did not respond to her.
You didn't turn to Ms Soriano and say "don't worry, I can handle it, I'm a police officer."? No I didn't.
At this point, you hadn't told anybody that you were a police officer? No I hadn't.
So you didn't reassure her that you didn't want to make trouble? I did not say anything to her.
2:40:40: Alexander Byrd has come to intervene. He was trying to calm things down? Yes, that's correct.
You were trying before then? Yes.
You were not successful in doing so? Actually, I was under the impression that Mr. Medeiros was going to let things go.
When you were talking to him or after Mr. Byrd intervened? After the security guard approached us, and I said something else, and mr byrd said something similar, based on his physical expression, Mr. Medeiros did not look angry. Yes, I believe he was listening to us and was gonna let things go.
So he was calming down? I believe so.
2:40:48: At this point, Mr. Medeiros has turned away with Mr. Byrd? Mr Medeiros has walked away from where he was standing, and Mr. Medeiros was turned away.
Medeiros has turned away with Mr Byrd? Now you are speaking with Mr. Elderts.
At the time Medeiros has turned away from interacting with Mr. Perrine, no crime has been committed, is that correct? That's correct.
While Mr. Byrd and Mr. Medeiros turned away, you turned back to Mr. Elderts? I believe I had turned prior to them turning away.
And the reason that you turned back to address Mr. Elderts, was because he said something to you? Yes, that's correct.
2:40:49: Mr. Elderts is seated and his hands are on the table. And you are talking to him? Yes Ma'am.
And Jessica West has come back to McDonalds. At this point in time, has any crime been committed? No ma'am.
2:40:53: Deedy was saying that you had identified yourself to Kollin Elderts? Yes ma'am.
Jessica West standing immediately to your left? No ma'am. She is standing behind me to my left.
She has a view to Mr. Elderts? Yes ma'am.
2:40:54 cashier view: This is when you said you were identifying yourself to Elderts? Showing your credentials? I meant my badge, not my credentials.
Jessica West, you say she was standing behind you? Are you saying she was not touching the table? How much closer to the table were you than she was? Not much. She might have been about a foot behind me to my left.
But there is nothing obstructing her vision between you and Kollin Elderts? I don't believe so.
And there is nothing obstructing her vision between you and her correct? No ma'am.
And you said that at this time, you were showing your creds because your use of force needed to be escalated, correct? Yes, based on his threats to me, I need to escalate my level of force.
And those threats were what? I believe, directly before this, "I'll fuck you up."
And Collin Elderts "I'll fuck you up" threat were directed to you, correct? And to nobody else? His aggression was directed solely to you? Yes, it was directly at me.
And you decided that you needed to up your show of force, correct? Yes, I needed to assert my command presence and identify myself.
When Jessica West came back into McDonalds, didn't she tell you "let's go?"? I was interacting with Mr. Elderts. I did not hear her say anything.
At this point in time, you knew that Jessica had returned from outside McDonalds? I knew that she was standing next to me, yes.
And you knew that she had gone out? I did not know that she had gone outside. I was watching the interaction and was not watching what she was doing.
At this point in time, you could have just walked out with Jessica and not put anyone in danger, correct? I believe that there was still a threat to Mr. Perrine.
The reason that you said yesterday that you needed to escalate the level of force, was because of the threat to you, correct? Yes, that is correct.
And Mr. Elderts, was directing his attention solely at you, correct? Yes, that is correct.
And Mr. Perrine was not paying attention to anyone, correct? At this point, I could not see what Mr. Perrine was doing.
But after you saw him look away, he did not seem engaged with anyone, correct? No he looked away from Mr. Elderts, and when Mr. Perrine looked away, he looked at the counter... towards Mr. Medeiros. And then Mr. Medeiros turned and addressed him (Mr. Perrine).
But at this time, Mr. Medeiros has already stopped paying attention at Mr. Perrine because of Mr. Byrd's intervention. Defense objects.
Mr. Medeiros had no further interaction with Mr. Perrine after Mr. Byrd took him off, correct? I did not see any. I was interacting with mr. Elderts.
And the only interaction you had with Mr. Elderts was on Kollin Elderts? Prosecution objects.
After Mr. Medeiros turned his attention away from Mr. Perrine, the only person that Kollin Elderts was focused on was you, correct? Defense objects.
The only person that Kollin Elderts interacted was you, correct? Yes, that is correct.
So, Mr. Elderts had told you what? He said "I'll fuck you up!"
And did you think that was a federal crime? At that time, I did not. I had not identified myself.
And at that time, he told you "I'll fuck you up", his attention was directed at you, correct? Yes, he directed that statement and threat to me.
[The rest of the prosecution witness testimony continued here...]
http://2ahawaii.com/index.php?topic=9629.msg98858#msg98858