Linked Events

  • HDF Suit: State Response Due: September 21, 2011
  • HDF Suit: Hearing on Plaintiff's MOTION for Prelim Inj: March 21, 2012
  • HDF Suit: Oral Arguments: December 06, 2012

HONOLULU POLICE CHIEF AND STATE OF HAWAII SUED FOR SECOND AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS (Read 376366 times)

Cougar8045

It's far from dried up, we are just getting started.
There's a small, but dedicated cadre of people that seem to spend all their time on facebook, in order to stay abreast of late-breaking developments.  What's that?  No, not ME!  I'm simply too busy!  ;)
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

2aHawaii

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Total likes: 67
  • Sheepdog
  • Referrals: 17
    • View Profile
    • 2aHawaii
So no response by the State yet? Is this one of those things that always comes down to the last minute?
I am not a lawyer.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - United States Constitution Amendment 2 & Hawaii State Constitution Article 1 Section 17

Buying from Amazon? Click through here

Cougar8045

I'm not an insider, but I'd expect that the state will grudgingly provide the bare minimum that they're required to provide, on the very last day that they can do it.  That's after a couple of requests for extensions, of course. 
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

Funtimes

You ever turn in your final paper or exam early :P ? I haven't.
Check out the Hawaii Defense Foundation.
HDF on Facebook
Defender of the Accused in Arkansas Courts
Posts are not legal advice & are my own, unless said so.

Cougar8045

You ever turn in your final paper or exam early :P ? I haven't.
lol, no, I sure haven't!  Speaking of which, is it F***ING WEDNESDAY yet?????  I'm so stoked to read the bs response I can barely stand it.  As I was reading through here, I was thinking that today was the 20th, so imagine my disappointment.  Like a kid who found out on the 24th that Christmas got pushed back a day!  And, is if that weren't bad enough, instead of reading the state's response, tomorrow is flu shot day at work... :grrr:
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

Colt808

lol, no, I sure haven't!  Speaking of which, is it F***ING WEDNESDAY yet????I'm so stoked to read the bs response I can barely stand it.  As I was reading through here, I was thinking that today was the 20th, so imagine my disappointment.  Like a kid who found out on the 24th that Christmas got pushed back a day!  And, is if that weren't bad enough, instead of reading the state's response, tomorrow is flu shot day at work... :grrr:

Why so negative? The State may admit wrong doing and Kealoha could read a press release stating they will start issuing permits immediately...



Of course this will be followed by a joint statment from Santa, the Easter bunny, and Elvis regarding WMD's, zombies, and the Loch Ness Monster.
Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it. ~Thomas Paine


And I still see stupid people.

antoinebugleboy

lol, no, I sure haven't!  Speaking of which, is it F***ING WEDNESDAY yet????I'm so stoked to read the bs response I can barely stand it.  As I was reading through here, I was thinking that today was the 20th, so imagine my disappointment.  Like a kid who found out on the 24th that Christmas got pushed back a day!  And, is if that weren't bad enough, instead of reading the state's response, tomorrow is flu shot day at work... :grrr:

Why so negative? The State may admit wrong doing and Kealoha could read a press release stating they will start issuing permits immediately...



Of course this will be followed by a joint statment from Santa, the Easter bunny, and Elvis regarding WMD's, zombies, and the Loch Ness Monster.

 ???  ::)  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. - Heinlein

I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine. - Rand

What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. - Hitchens

Cougar8045

lol, no, I sure haven't!  Speaking of which, is it F***ING WEDNESDAY yet????I'm so stoked to read the bs response I can barely stand it.  As I was reading through here, I was thinking that today was the 20th, so imagine my disappointment.  Like a kid who found out on the 24th that Christmas got pushed back a day!  And, is if that weren't bad enough, instead of reading the state's response, tomorrow is flu shot day at work... :grrr:

Why so negative? The State may admit wrong doing and Kealoha could read a press release stating they will start issuing permits immediately...



Of course this will be followed by a joint statment from Santa, the Easter bunny, and Elvis regarding WMD's, zombies, and the Loch Ness Monster.
Missed the fine print at first, good one.  I was trying to decide if you were really that much of an optimist, or if you just hadn't ever read anything at all to do with these 2nd Amendment suits.  Well played, sir, well played.
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

Dregs

i don't know why, but I'm giddy to see what they're going to say. If their response is just as baselessly anti-gun and confused regarding 2nd amendment rights as they have been portraying, then I'm going to laugh all the way to the first court hearing.

Cougar8045

i don't know why, but I'm giddy to see what they're going to say. If their response is just as baselessly anti-gun and confused regarding 2nd amendment rights as they have been portraying, then I'm going to laugh all the way to the first court hearing.
Win.

And yes, it will be exactly as you predict.
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

Dregs

HDF Suit: Hearing on Plaintiff's MOTION for Prelim Inj: January 17, 2011
HDF Suit: State Response Due: September 21, 2011

Can someone tell me what "motion for Preliminary Injunction" means?

Is one side defending and the other attacking? (plaintiff, defendant)

2aHawaii

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Total likes: 67
  • Sheepdog
  • Referrals: 17
    • View Profile
    • 2aHawaii
Not an expert in proceedings but I believe the motion for Preliminary Injuction is when the court will hear the plaintiff's arguments to put a hold on the laws that infringe. If you read the motion, it mentions a few of the HRS 134 articles.
I am not a lawyer.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - United States Constitution Amendment 2 & Hawaii State Constitution Article 1 Section 17

Buying from Amazon? Click through here

Cougar8045

Not an expert in proceedings but I believe the motion for Preliminary Injuction is when the court will hear the plaintiff's arguments to put a hold on the laws that infringe. If you read the motion, it mentions a few of the HRS 134 articles.
I think you're spot-on.  For a primary injunction to be granted, I believe the judge has to review the case, and if he decides that there is a high likelihood that the plaintiff will succeed on the merits of his/her case, the relief is granted pending the actual courtroom hearing. 
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

HiCarry

Not an expert in proceedings but I believe the motion for Preliminary Injuction is when the court will hear the plaintiff's arguments to put a hold on the laws that infringe. If you read the motion, it mentions a few of the HRS 134 articles.
I think you're spot-on.  For a primary injunction to be granted, I believe the judge has to review the case, and if he decides that there is a high likelihood that the plaintiff will succeed on the merits of his/her case, the relief is granted pending the actual courtroom hearing. 

Generally a preliminary injunction is granted when the plantiff can articulate that they will suffer an irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted. If the judge agrees that the harm is sufficient and would be irreparable, he could enjoin the defendent to cease enforcing certain laws or taking specific actions that would cause the irreparable harm. In this case, one possible outcome should the injunction be granted is that certain parts of HRS 134 would be unenforcable until the suit is resolved.

It is not supposed to be a determination of the relative merits of the case at hand. On the other hand a summary judgement is issued with there are no material disagreements about the facts of law involved in the case.

Pizzo

Well, the day has come......my fingers are crossed and I got my knee high boots on!

FYI, the boots are for the bull$hit......LMAO!!  :rofl:

Cougar8045


Generally a preliminary injunction is granted when the plantiff can articulate that they will suffer an irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted. If the judge agrees that the harm is sufficient and would be irreparable, he could enjoin the defendent to cease enforcing certain laws or taking specific actions that would cause the irreparable harm. In this case, one possible outcome should the injunction be granted is that certain parts of HRS 134 would be unenforcable until the suit is resolved.

It is not supposed to be a determination of the relative merits of the case at hand. On the other hand a summary judgement is issued with there are no material disagreements about the facts of law involved in the case.
I think that the courts have set the precedent that an infringement of Second Amendment rights constitutes irreparable harm, which would be good for us if the judge considers not being able to carry a firearm an infringement of 2A rights.  Needless to say, I'm sure he doesn't consider that any infringement, but hey, you never know!
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

Kingkeoni

Re: HONOLULU POLICE CHIEF AND STATE OF HAWAII SUED FOR SECOND AMENDMENT VIOLATIO
« Reply #96 on: September 21, 2011, 07:09:54 AM »
Well, the day has come......my fingers are crossed and I got my knee high boots on!

FYI, the boots are for the bull$hit......LMAO!!  :rofl:

Then why are they pink?
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.

Travboi

What time are they supposed to have their response by? Idk but im eager and cant wait to read it. I mean they trusted me with firearm at 17 to defend our country but i cant be trusted here to protect myself and my family.

Cougar8045

What time are they supposed to have their response by? Idk but im eager and cant wait to read it. I mean they trusted me with firearm at 17 to defend our country but i cant be trusted here to protect myself and my family.
Well, obviously you're not as responsible when you don't have your Decision Making Shirt and Pants on!   ::)  The response may not come today; apparently the court is pretty slow getting things uploaded to the internet, which could mean that the first word we'd hear would be when the hard copy gets delivered to Chris Baker and atty's.  I'm on the edge of my damn seat!
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

Pizzo

Re: HONOLULU POLICE CHIEF AND STATE OF HAWAII SUED FOR SECOND AMENDMENT VIOLATIO
« Reply #99 on: September 21, 2011, 07:25:00 AM »
Well, the day has come......my fingers are crossed and I got my knee high boots on!

FYI, the boots are for the bull$hit......LMAO!!  :rofl:

Then why are they pink?

Dang KingKeoni, how'd you know they're pink?!  ???