107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS (Read 17608 times)

Falken Hawke

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #20 on: February 24, 2015, 04:57:47 PM »
[Trim]  Are the listeners of this show (my 16 year old daughter) and the characters I hear call in really the people we want to be debating.
(I listen to it while driving the kids to school)
Considering the push for more voter turnout that high school students are being exposed to added to those same students reaching voting age i1 - 4 years from now, I'd say keeping everyone informed would be a good idea.

macsak

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #21 on: February 24, 2015, 05:21:31 PM »
that's cool.  I don't generally listen to that station.  The only reason I brought it up is someone alerted me on FB.  I tuned in through live streaming on the comupter,  listen a while to see what was up, chimed in on FB page since they quit answering the phone. 

This is the kind of stuff we all have to jump on, keep the mis information by anti gunners to a minimum.

some guy with japanese characters and (heavies) on his facebook page and joel dela cruz are quoted on their facebook page now
plus a rebuttal presumably written by the djs under the quote of "hypothetical gun owner"

bass monkey

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2015, 06:27:04 PM »
checked out the fb. seems like they edited or removed a bunch of posts. No proof, but just by looking at whats left there. 

one2boost

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2015, 06:29:47 PM »
I also looked on the radio station FB, I could not find anything about what has been posted.

Heavies

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2015, 06:36:02 PM »
some guy with japanese characters and (heavies) on his facebook page and joel dela cruz are quoted on their facebook page now
plus a rebuttal presumably written by the djs under the quote of "hypothetical gun owner"
checked out the fb. seems like they edited or removed a bunch of posts. No proof, but just by looking at whats left there. 
I also looked on the radio station FB, I could not find anything about what has been posted.

Lol!  :thumbsup:  typical left M.O.    Many times, :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: I've been censored on FB. 

macsak

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2015, 06:40:40 PM »

checked out the fb. seems like they edited or removed a bunch of posts. No proof, but just by looking at whats left there.

It's interesting that there was only one post in favor
You know they are not going to delete those, so that means...

ren

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #26 on: February 24, 2015, 09:40:27 PM »
The problem is that you give idiots like this a platform and they spew out crap like this morning.
1st amendment, yes, he has that but like all other rights it comes with responsibility. Along with what DL was saying about his creds here's something more to add:
From an interview http://www.hawaii411.com/articles/ryan.asp
Hawaii411: Would you ever consider working for a lite rock station, or does that not fit you at all?
Hawaiian Ryan: Oh, I'm a total sellout dude, Money... Money talks. I don't care, I just get paid, you know what I mean? I would belly dance, be a whore, sell drugs, whatever (laughs). Whatever works, as long as I don't get caught, yah? I'm game.

Anyone remember when Brickwood Galutera was on the radio...where is he now? That's right a rabid anti-gun lawmaker.


see where this may be going?
Deeds Not Words

xer 21

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #27 on: February 24, 2015, 10:23:07 PM »
lol, 102.7 is a joke of a station anyways. 

xer 21

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #28 on: February 25, 2015, 10:40:05 AM »
So i posted this, not expecting a response:



and got this super professional reply:



so, let's see where this goes.  i'm going to try to get on the show.  i doubt they'll let me on, as they're clearly screening me, but hey, worth a shot.

if i get on the show, i hope you guys can tune in and let me know how it went.

ren

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #29 on: February 25, 2015, 10:52:13 AM »
I dont go to a circus expecting to get professional results, just laughs. Remember that you will be debating with clowns, Xer. They will attack you with balloons and other invalid argumentive tools.
Deeds Not Words

macsak

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2015, 10:55:34 AM »
So i posted this, not expecting a response:



and got this super professional reply:



so, let's see where this goes.  i'm going to try to get on the show.  i doubt they'll let me on, as they're clearly screening me, but hey, worth a shot.

if i get on the show, i hope you guys can tune in and let me know how it went.

nice

Bota-CS1

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2015, 12:05:55 PM »
I dont go to a circus expecting to get professional results, just laughs. Remember that you will be debating with clowns, Xer. They will attack you with balloons and other invalid argumentive tools.

Exactly.  Don't expect a fair shot.  They'll edit whatever they want however they want to make you look like a tool.  If you follow football it'd be like going to the Black Hole in Oakland dressed in a Chief's jersey. 
No one is coming, it’s up to us.

Legislation should never be about depriving law abiding citizens of something, but rather taking those things away from criminals.

aieahound

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2015, 12:10:01 PM »
I say awesome Xer.

Go kick their ass !

Just make sure to take some mental ammo.
they'll definitely try to ridicule you.

Won't be a serious debate. Will be zinger v. Zinger.

causa mortis

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2015, 12:27:41 PM »
This is why I only listen to talk radio like Mark Levin or Hugh Hewitt.

xer 21

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #34 on: February 25, 2015, 01:48:25 PM »
like i said, i doubt they'll even let me on after i call them.  but i plan on having printouts of all the relevant data to make my points, so they cant argue that its false. 

and also, if they let me on, im recording them whether they know it or not to have raw footage as proof. 

only need one party's consent in hawaii, right?

stangzilla

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #35 on: February 25, 2015, 02:18:34 PM »
here's a universal comeback for anything Hawaiian ryan says:
"yo mama!"


they dont have any research or factual information on gun laws or data whatsoever.
they are only goig to try to make you mad and call you names.
they aren't even interested in real firearm legislation.
bottom line is, you cant reason with stupid.
but i wish you the best on their radio show.
knock um dead, bro!   :thumbsup:

aieahound

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #36 on: February 25, 2015, 02:31:48 PM »
That's why I say zinger v. Zinger

Them :  Blah blah guns
Us:  Would you be unhappy if a concealed carry holder saved your family's life at zippy's
Them:  bystanders would be hit or people only care about their own families. (Based on what Ryan said)
Us:  Jane you ignorant slut. Just kidding. You are talking out of your okole. The vast majority of Hawaii gun owners are upstanding citizens.
Them: how do you know that ? You know them ?
Us: yeah, we hang at kokohead.
Etc......

It would need to be witty for their dim audience. Not just fact based. It's not talk radio.
Slipping in facts would definitely help though.


Just my opinion.

one2boost

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #37 on: February 25, 2015, 02:32:26 PM »
if you do, please make your own recording as well.  Just let them know maybe after everything is done and you regularly listen to another competing radio station, possibly 104.3.

stangzilla

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #38 on: February 25, 2015, 02:34:25 PM »
us:  "you know who is the biggest supporter of the 2nd amendment here in hawaii?"
ryan: "who?"
us:  "yo mama!"


or to whatever data they come with, the reply is: "thats how it would appear........to the untrained eye."

xer 21

Re: 107 the bomb ANTI GUN RANTS
« Reply #39 on: February 25, 2015, 05:19:35 PM »