Funny. Not one thing to back up your statement about the majority of mass murderers have liberal ideological leanings and/or register democrat.
Or about how mental health is not a factor.
Same old distract and attack.
OK I'll concede your examples.
Still
Seung hi cho
Loughner
Holmes
Lanza
All Mental health with a history of serious mental health problems
(Although Lanza technically stole his mom's gun)
Oklahoma bombing
Definitely conservative
And more killed than all of the above.
(And you didn't say mass shootings, you said mass murder)
Okay, now that I have more time .....
– Nidal Hasan – Ft Hood Shooter: Registered Democrat and Muslim.
– Aaron Alexis, Navy Yard shooter – black liberal/Obama voter
– Seung-Hui Cho – Virginia Tech shooter: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff, registered Democrat.
– James Holmes – the “Dark Knight”/Colorado shooter: Registered Democrat, staff worker on the Obama campaign, #Occupy guy,progressive liberal, hated Christians.
– Amy Bishop, the rabid leftist, killed her colleagues in Alabama, Obama supporter.
– Andrew J. Stack, flew plane into IRS building in Texas – Leftist Democrat
– James J. Lee who was the “green activist”/ leftist took hostages at Discovery Channel – progressive liberal Democrat.
McVeigh was NOT "definitely Conservative." He was agnostic and registered Republican in the 1980s. He became part of a movement to overthrow what they believed to be a tyrannical government.
Think about the word "Conservative" and what it means. Conservatives are not known for blowing up buildings and killing people, much less over government-sanctioned law enforcement actions. If anything, Conservatives would rather the Branch Davidians and Randy Weaver surrender and take their grievances to the justice system. It's not the Conservatives who protest in public and vandalize cities in protest for supposed civil rights violations. You need to get your definitions straightened out!
My example was to illustrate how dangerous it is to create arbitrary groups of people who are denied Constitutional rights simply for their being labeled. it's obvious here labeling is grossly unfair and inaccurate for most people. Not everyone believes 100% of the things people associate with Liberalism or Conservatism, but you would pigeon-hole everyone by, what? How they vote? How they register to vote? Whether they are Christian or Atheist?
There's a whole lot of stereotyping going on when you go down that road. Not one stereotype is true regardless of how many anecdotal example you can find. You simply have no way to know what is in someone's mind or heart.