I spoke to a buddy of mine a couple of weeks about what he thought was the best way for me to get involved with the City Council to get it to take action to restore the range. He works for the Corporation Council which is the legal department of the City which takes care of the lawsuits filed against it. I lamented the horrible conditions of the range, the limited hours and a couple of other things that I can't recall at this time. My bud is knowledgeable about firearms but doesn't currently own one in Hawaii nor does he go to the range to shoot. Nonetheless, he 'fessed that he wasn't up on the laws affecting the range nor "that side" of City Hall's business but did mentioned the name of the person who is in charge of handling the range matters and said he would make a couple of calls and get back to me. In any event, he mentioned, in so many words, that he thought that the City is required to maintain a range to comply with some law/regulation for training LE personnel and that the City detests the fact that it must operate the range. Otherwise it would completely shut it down. Sounds something akin to the City's attitude about policing the registration of firearms which it believes is not its job. Although by bud didn't state that it was of any particular problem, I know that the City has to contend with complaints from the general non-firearm-bearing-enthusiast who see the range as a nuisance. It's sort of like the issuance of liquor license except for one big difference: firearm registration and range operations makes no money for the City. He mentioned to me that he was hiking up the serene trails of Koko Head one early morning when at 8 a.m. (he says it could have been 9 am) sharp, World War III broke out and people on the trail ran for cover. LOL.