before that he dealt with North Korea, is continuously working with a trade deal with China, builds a wall on our Southern border, keeps fighting for America first by pulling us out of the Paris Accords,
yep our President has been busy. His accomplishments shadow that of at least 2 Presidents before him.

oh yeah, FISA case comes out in a week. Let's see who really is behind the corruption.
3.
2.
1.
pull the drain on the swamp

meanwhile the VP's drug addict of a son and Navy discharge officer pulls in millions a year for just being - Biden's son.
"Know anything about energy?" Hunter: "nope"
"Speak Ukranian?" Hunter: "nope."

one of foreign policy's principles IS quid pro quo. We don't give anything to another country for free. There is an exchange.

Rep. Matt Gaetz
@RepMattGaetz
If wiretapping a political opponent is an impeachable offense, I look forward to reading that inspector general’s report, because maybe it’s a different president we should be impeaching.

Headline on yahoo is "3 of 4 constitutional law experts say Trump is impeachable".  I wonder what those 3 say about the 2a.  And IIRC, the 3 who said he is impeachable were all vetted by the DNC as their "experts".

Well, the Dems in the House have announced two article of impeachment being drafted:

1.  Abuse of Power, and
2.  Obstruction of Congress

The Dems and the MSM (but I repeat myself) were naming "BRIBERY!!" as the offense the last 3-4 weeks, saying the evidence of bribery is overwhelming.

Why was bribery not included in the articles of impeachment?  They are using an ambiguous catch-all phrase instead.

They haven't identified a specific crime.  They are lobbing an accusation based on nothing more than "we believe Trump was trying to use foreign aid to get help against a political opponent."

Thin, unprovable, and no evidence to support their beliefs.

https://www.khon2.com/top-stories/ed-case-releases-statement-on-articles-of-impeachment/

“I have supported the formal impeachment inquiry since the whistleblower’s report on the President’s dealings with Ukraine was provided to Congress in September. I have closely followed the inquiry, to include a full review of the Intelligence Committee’s 400-plus page majority and minority reports and personally attending the Judiciary Committee’s hearings. I have received thousands of responses from my constituents to my requests for their input. I believe that the facts revealed by the inquiry to date justify full U.S. House consideration of articles of impeachment for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

“However, I owe it to my country, my constituents and my own constitutional responsibilities to fully inform my decision before I vote on the articles. I’m not there yet because I haven’t reviewed all of the actual articles, the Judiciary Committee’s report and the full House debate. When I have done so, I will discharge my constitutional duty in this truly sad matter per my oath of office and to the best of my ability.”

clownery

The newest rumors floating around is that there is a good reason why the USMCA was announced by Pelosi an hour after the announcement of the articles for impeachment. The rumor is she is trading votes for the USMCA in exchange for votes for impeachment. Apparently the 31 dem house reps that are in red states are nervous about losing their jobs. Supposedly Pelosi was holding up the USMCA due to her hatred towards trump and was being pressured by a lot of her constituents (Not just the 31) to get it in for a vote and they were threatening to vote against impeachment if she didn’t bring it up for a vote.

Otherwise it makes no sense to announce articles of impeachment and then hand trump a victory an hour later. Just goes to show how divisive impeachment is.

...Is it just me or has Pelosi's speech patterns changed recently.  Like she's slurring more words or something.

The newest rumors floating around is that there is a good reason why the USMCA was announced by Pelosi an hour after the announcement of the articles for impeachment. The rumor is she is trading votes for the USMCA in exchange for votes for impeachment. Apparently the 31 dem house reps that are in red states are nervous about losing their jobs. Supposedly Pelosi was holding up the USMCA due to her hatred towards trump and was being pressured by a lot of her constituents (Not just the 31) to get it in for a vote and they were threatening to vote against impeachment if she didn’t bring it up for a vote.

Otherwise it makes no sense to announce articles of impeachment and then hand trump a victory an hour later. Just goes to show how divisive impeachment is.

Not recent. She has been an alcoholic for a long time!   

It seems to have gotten worse in say the past 2-3 weeks.  Or maybe I was just hearing more from her as I've been watching the TV news more.

Reminds me of this math professor I had in college.  I swear she was a high functioning drunk and probably in early dementia and actually looked quite like Pelosi.  Anyways, one day, she was trying to write the symbol for delta on the whiteboard.  She drew it upside down.  She sort of shrugged, shook her head and mumbled "wait, no".  She then erased the upside down delta and said out loud "delta" and drew it upside down again.  This did NOT go unnoticed by the class.  She sort of shrugged again, shook her head, erased the upside down delta and finally wrote the delta right side up.  The class was statistics and was pretty cake, but she certainly made it challenging. . . 

When the ACA passed, the Dems (lead by Obama) had a massive piggy bank under the guise of a "Stimulus Package" from which they  bought  bribed  coerced  incentivized  rewarded  negotiated  traded for votes.

I was wondering what Pelosi was going to use this time to ... trade ... for their impeachment support.

Bernie got a house for being Hidabeast's sacrificial lamb.  I wonder who in the Dem field is getting the new house after 2020?