1) You want facts?  Here they are.

Please listen to REPUBLICAN retired army Lt. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, who served as former Secretary of State Colin Powell's Chief-of-Staff, to 2) hear his take on the assassination of Soleimani, the American Empire, as well as his contention that the US currently is a country that has made imperial war its sole business.

SNIP

Enjoy!     

Couldn't listen to the whole thing . . . 

Seems like you like "his TAKE" and see that as "facts". . .

Maybe I should start a YT channel. . . I have spoken. . .

I'm a former Air Force officer and DoD contractor.  We IT professionals have access to EVERYTHING, because we need to.  I've been in facilities most people don't know exist.

Like silo's under malls. #tinfoil

Like silo's under malls. #tinfoil

I can neither confirm nor deny.   

I can neither confirm nor deny.   

BRB, grabbing more tin foil from Longs.

BRB, grabbing more tin foil from Longs.

We know.

Don't forget to pick up some milk.  You're almost out.

Like silo's under malls. #tinfoil

Not the malls.  The former pineapple fields in Kunia.  That's why the planes were circling over Ren's place. . . 

My opinion? - nope.

My analysis is based on sound reasoning -- that the individual you think is talking "facts" about the Trump administration is actually offering an OPINION as well.  He has no inside information.  After he retired, he no longer had a need to know regarding any classified intelligence.

I'm a former Air Force officer and DoD contractor.  We IT professionals have access to EVERYTHING, because we need to.  I've been in facilities most people don't know exist.

Not everyone was born and raised on this rock.  Some of us were actually in the middle of the things you only read about -- or in your case, imagine to have happened.

You make it sound like you have open access to all the classified information the US Government has on file.     

I seriously doubt your claim to having privy to such information and will not waste any time asking you to prove something that you do not possess.

You simply will give the "oh, that's top-secret" excuse to your gullible faithful on this forum that will readily accept your lies.

For those of us with higher order critical thinking skills, we know better.     

Couldn't listen to the whole thing . . . 

Seems like you like "his TAKE" and see that as "facts". . .

Maybe I should start a YT channel. . . I have spoken. . .

Maybe you should listen to the whole segment that is not more than 15 minutes long or so.

Wilkerson make claims that are backed with facts that he had full access too.

Maybe you should listen to the whole segment that is not more than 15 minutes long or so.

Wilkerson make claims that are backed with facts that he had full access too.

I'll try to listen to the rest tomorrow.  The video just reeked of cheap propo though that I couldn't sit through all the way at lunch. 

Then again, is he "making claims" or conveying facts?  Having full access to information doesn't tell me much if I have no way of vetting his claims.  Just like you mentioned above, even if I was privy to or had access to sensitive/classified information, I wouldn't have a good way to back it up. 

You make it sound like you have open access to all the classified information the US Government has on file.     

I seriously doubt your claim to having privy to such information and will not waste any time asking you to prove something that you do not possess.

You simply will give the "oh, that's top-secret" excuse to your gullible faithful on this forum that will readily accept your lies.

For those of us with higher order critical thinking skills, we know better.     

I don't really care what you believe.

You have no idea.

I don't really care what you believe.

You have no idea.

Who cares what you believe?

If you are not going to spill it, then STFU!

Who cares what you believe?

If you are not going to spill it, then STFU!

You seem mad.

You mad, bro?   

You make it sound like you have open access to all the classified information the US Government has on file.     

I seriously doubt your claim to having privy to such information and will not waste any time asking you to prove something that you do not possess.

You simply will give the "oh, that's top-secret" excuse to your gullible faithful on this forum that will readily accept your lies.

For those of us with higher order critical thinking skills, we know better.     

says the guy that says there are ICBM silos on Oahu...

says the guy that says there are ICBM silos on Oahu...

Always personal attacks and insults.  Get ready to receive what you dish out.   

BTW - Go clean someone's teeth.

says the guy that says there are ICBM silos on Oahu...

I found some in Kunia

Always personal attacks and insults.  Get ready to receive what you dish out.   

BTW - Go clean someone's teeth.

for all your education, you have a different interpretation of "always" and "personal attacks and insults" than most
I rarely post comments to you, and pointing out something that you have claimed to be true is not is certainly not an "attack" nor "insult"

Always personal attacks and insults.  Get ready to receive what you dish out.   

BTW - Go clean someone's teeth.

How is feeding you your own posted comments an attack?  Are you now admitting the ICBM silos assertion was false?  Or do you feel all disagreements with your opinion are personal attacks?  If the latter, that's a very victimized, Liberal snowflake point of view.

says the guy that says there are ICBM silos on Oahu...

Since I have never seen silos on Oahu, or not seen the silos, it's Schrodingers Cat all over again.

for all your education, you have a different interpretation of "always" and "personal attacks and insults" than most
I rarely post comments to you, and pointing out something that you have claimed to be true is not is certainly not an "attack" nor "insult"

You made your point clear on many occasions, but you continually persist in making the SAME POINT over and over again.

It's no longer an issue of making a point in your identical posts to me, you are PROVOKING ME.

Hence, you want to play?

LET'S PLAY! 

How is feeding you your own posted comments an attack?  Are you now admitting the ICBM silos assertion was false?  Or do you feel all disagreements with your opinion are personal attacks?  If the latter, that's a very victimized, Liberal snowflake point of view.

There is a BIG DIFFERENCE between offering a rebuttal to something I recently posted and posting a response that does not address the issue being discussed.