Civil Beat at it again (Read 6668 times)

hvybarrels

Re: Civil Beat at it again
« Reply #20 on: February 27, 2020, 10:12:35 PM »
He cites multiple sources and the links are directly in the article.

If you think you are going to influence someone here with the soft gaslight approach then save your time. This site is populated by those who have been repeatedly burned and scorned by the government and silenced by billionaire-owned media. Long term political stability comes from respecting the rules of the Republic, but instead we got an oligarchy and now the toadies have to live with the consequences of a fractured and angry electorate.
Pretending to be offended does not make you a good person.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Civil Beat at it again
« Reply #21 on: February 27, 2020, 10:31:18 PM »
If you think you are going to influence someone here with the soft gaslight approach then save your time. This site is populated by those who have been repeatedly burned and scorned by the government and silenced by billionaire-owned media. Long term political stability comes from respecting the rules of the Republic, but instead we got an oligarchy and now the toadies have to live with the consequences of a fractured and angry electorate.

One would need to actually FOLLOW, READ and EVALUATE the information linked before making an objective and rational analysis of the points presented.

I did that.

The dude's a lying, cherry-picking, headline-spinning, anti-gun Leftist with no business deciding for anyone other than himself what firearms one should own.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: Civil Beat at it again
« Reply #22 on: February 27, 2020, 10:35:30 PM »
He cites multiple sources and the links are directly in the article.

oh I did not see those hyperlinks!. OK I must agree with the author. You should give up all your scary assault guns. Why? Because the author does not like guns and since he does not like guns YOU are not allowed to own them.
Will you Mr. eyeeatingfish give up all your assault guns?
Deeds Not Words

mrgaf

Re: Civil Beat at it again
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2020, 07:12:19 PM »
One would need to actually FOLLOW, READ and EVALUATE the information linked before making an objective and rational analysis of the points presented.

I did that.

The dude's a lying, cherry-picking, headline-spinning, anti-gun Leftist with no business deciding for anyone other than himself what firearms one should own.

And his mamma is a dog faced two bit  Ju yen Pon-ske who howls at the moon and turns tricks in Waianae! (Smells bad too).... :shake: :wave: :wacko:
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.  Thomas Paine.

No man can get rich in politics unless he is a crook.  It cannot be done. Harry Truman

Only good liberal is one taking a dirt nap.

robtmc

Re: Civil Beat at it again
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2020, 07:57:22 PM »
Will you Mr. eyeeatingfish give up all your assault guns?
HPD is exempt from all these facist new laws.

Even the paid trolls.

eyeeatingfish

Re: Civil Beat at it again
« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2020, 08:14:20 PM »
If you think you are going to influence someone here with the soft gaslight approach then save your time.

I have no such intentions, I just point out inaccuracies. I don't care if it benefits my position or hurts my position, if it is flawed or inaccurate I will point it out. Like it or not, we don't have the monopoly on logical arguments.

I don't agree with author of the piece but he states his opinion and supports it. Just because I don't agree with his conclusion doesn't mean he is lying or spreading propaganda

eyeeatingfish

Re: Civil Beat at it again
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2020, 08:16:08 PM »
oh I did not see those hyperlinks!. OK I must agree with the author. You should give up all your scary assault guns. Why? Because the author does not like guns and since he does not like guns YOU are not allowed to own them.
Will you Mr. eyeeatingfish give up all your assault guns?

I didn't say anything about agreeing with him, I only said he gave sources. If you disagree that's completely fine but don't say he didn't cite any sources when he clearly did.