No need to explain your vote. You might incriminate yourself.

No need to explain your vote. You might incriminate yourself.

no one here does anything illegal...

Compliance is a funny concept.

You can BE in compliance without actually doing what the lawmakers tried to compel.

"Parts kits".

https://shop.mrcolionnoir.com/products/i-will-not-comply-shirt?variant=30332387426384

I will comply in hope that i will please my masters and maybe they will let me join the Democratic socialist party! So i can to tell people what to do someday!

I will comply with all Constitutional Federal, State, and local laws.
If I see something, I will say NOTHING!
The biggest waste of money in our local budget is Police.
Really! I'd put the money into the Fire dept and pay them better.
There is no crime here,  Y'all outlawed it so why make more
laws?

No need to comply if you don't own anything. They were all lost at sea

I think the bigger question is if the government is going to enforce all the new laws and enforce them equally? We all know what the answer is...

 How many 10+ round pistol magazines were turned in since '92? So what makes them think if there is a new law that the rest of the 10 + round
magazines will be turned in?

Logic here.
SO if Ige didn't enforce laws on Mauna Kea - you could have std cap mags on the Mauna and not get arrested

Mine are needed to protect the Mauna

I figured I would use the smart ass defense  that I do not have any 30 round 556 mags. However, I do have 10round 456 socom mags...

Not quite sure how the Man will take that logic though.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

Is there any literature that I could read up on this law? Is there no grandfathering?

I don’t have any magazines,  CA Senator Kevin de Leon said they are clips.

I do not own any firearms, ammo, reloading supplies, body armor, comms, preps, or standard magazines

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

The mag law is dumb but it really didn't change anything. Since nearly every rifle has a pistol version they were always illegal. It was just never enforced.

we in distress....

The mag law is dumb but it really didn't change anything. Since nearly every rifle has a pistol version they were always illegal. It was just never enforced.

No sir, every pistol version of a rifle are required to have welded magazines so our legal magazines are incapable of being inserted into them.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

No sir, every pistol version of a rifle are required to have welded magazines so our legal magazines are incapable of being inserted into them.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Additionally, since the modified AR pistol is in fact classified a pistol, it is limited to 10 round capacity mags whether the mag can be removed or not.

If the 10 rd mag is removable, the gas system must be disabled, making it no longer a semi-auto firearm.

They should have never treated [rifles with a pistol version] and [rifles without a  pistol version] differently in the first place. 

As we can see, it was easier to get the pistol mag capacity limit passed first, now followed up with the rifle mag limit.  Boiling a frog. 

No laws will ever be enough for the anti-gun, anti-2A crowd until guns are no longer allowed for anyone not in government.

Wait, if this passes, they will say no more than 7rds can be loaded.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I don't see why there is concern about ar mags > 10 rounds since most people already thought they were illegal. Except for the kindness of HPD's heart they did not enforce the law. If this law does get enacted will we be allowed to have AR pistols?