"There is no one better than a good Cop."

I wonder how many people would truly agree that good cops are God's gift to people.



"There is no one worse than a bad Cop."

Need to revise that.

At the present, cops are nothing but the domestic enforcers of the state as the military is nothing more than the international enforcers of the World, since the death of the republic, as both are now in the American empire.



"There are more good Cops than bad." 

Wrong, in today's corrupt America, there are more bad cops than good.

Don't believe me; just wait when gun confiscation begins.  Guess who will be knocking on your door and be doing the confiscating as well as what other heavily armed group they will have as back-up should you resist with your arms.

So your evidence that there are more bad Cops is "they will do something bad IN THE FUTURE?!"

You really do have "issues."   

So your evidence that there are more bad Cops is "they will do something bad IN THE FUTURE?!"

You really do have "issues."   

You are the one who has issues and is the mole the 2nd Amendment community should keep a close eye on.

As I alluded to you in a post on another thread, for all your so-called surface support for gun rights, you always support the police when they harass, rough up, and shoot first and find excuses later OVER the rights of the people affected.

Extrapolating, I speculate that if 10Rd magazines become law, you would be the guy on the range that would lecture and even rat out the person using a standard capacity mag to the range master or HPD, just to satisfy your loyalty to the fascist elite.

====
nope, I am a...
STOOPIDIST !   

def.
one who is prejudiced against stoopid people, regardless of race, religion, skin color, hair color, clothes, cologne, mouthwash, shoes, type of car, etc. etc.

I'm an assholist. . . It all depends on if someone is an asshole or not.  Not prejudiced against all assholes.  Just extreme assholes, or at least asshole levels much higher than I am. 

And yeah, I'm an asshole too, but not a high level.  At least I think. . .

I'm an assholist. . . It all depends on if someone is an asshole or not.  Not prejudiced against all assholes.  Just extreme assholes, or at least asshole levels much higher than I am. 

And yeah, I'm an asshole too, but not a high level.  At least I think. . .

your boss is an asshole...

your boss is an asshole...

Yeah, but about same level as me, so 

 

  How about going back to personal responsibility first rather than immediately jumping to victim mode. . .

That is not the ghetto way.

That is not the ghetto way.

Let me aks my expert on ghetto. . .

Let me aks my expert on ghetto. . .

your boss is pretty ghetto...

your boss is pretty ghetto...

clips

A simple warning would have not sufficed?  I guess not; book him!

You forgot to say “Dano!”   

====
nope, I am a...
STOOPIDIST !   

def.
one who is prejudiced against stoopid people, regardless of race, religion, skin color, hair color, clothes, cologne, mouthwash, shoes, type of car, etc. etc.

That's a whole lotta stoopid....

Yes, HPD could really use a man of your talents; a person that can find facts to confuse the issue as well as flip flop on issues just to win an argument.

For example, on one side you say and argue against HPD in their support of 10Rd magazine restrictions, BUT are supportive of HPD when it comes to officer involved shooting incidents.

This having your cake and eating it too you got going on is exactly the perfect PR person HPD needs to propagandize their anti-2nd Amendment stance to the public.

Covid-19 has really uncovered the pitfalls of financing the largest military the World has seen.  Most recently, it has brought to light how America's soldiers and seamen are nothing but expendable assets in order to maintain the American empire.

The recent firing of Captain Crozier of the nuclear aircraft carrier, USS Theodore Roosevelt, is the most high profile event that illustrated how far the US military will go to ensure discipline within its ranks in order to dominate the seas.  His being relieved of his command, though justifiable, nevertheless shows that there are still patriotic Americans who will not sacrifice the health and well-being of the personnel under their command for imperial goals.

for example bashing the US Military but yet praising a US Navy CPT? You're either for them or against....

for example bashing the US Military but yet praising a US Navy CPT? You're either for them or against....

My praise for Captain Crozier is not because of any love for the imperial acts of the US military, but for his PUTTING ASIDE that imperial mission to see to the health and well-being of his crew under his command.  He knew the risks to his career and took the consequences like a REAL MAN AND HERO of the former American Republic.

No Ren, there is no inconsistency in my beliefs.

My praise for Captain Crozier is not because of any love for the imperial acts of the US military, but for his PUTTING ASIDE that imperial mission to see to the health and well-being of his crew under his command.  He knew the risks to his career and took the consequences like a REAL MAN AND HERO of the former American Republic.

No Ren, there is no inconsistency in my beliefs.

Yet, when someone ELSE posts a pro-police comment, and then posts a comment unsupportive of an officer's actions, you scream hypocrite.

Either that, or you assume supporting police in general somehow means supporting EVERYTHING, good or bad, individual Cops do.

    

Yet, when someone ELSE posts a pro-police comment, and then posts a comment unsupportive of an officer's actions, you scream hypocrite.

Either that, or you assume supporting police in general somehow means supporting EVERYTHING, good or bad, individual Cops do.

    

First, there is no secret I am not a supporter of American military policy and have never supported any actions taken by them since the illegal overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 to the present.  In the example of Captain Crozier, as I commented to Ren, I supported the heroic actions of a commanding officer in the US Navy, DEFYING his mission as part of its military policy in the region, in order to protect the men and women under his command.  In this case, my support of the actions of Captain Crozier did not go against any of my core beliefs.

In contrast, you have gone on record defending HPD and its officers in any officer involved shooting incidents with little concern whether the rights of those individuals shot were violated.  Most recently, you have also gone on record in defense of the right to own standard capacity magazines.  From your actions, it seems to me you have an inconsistent standard when it comes to the rights of individuals.  When actions of the police potentially violate the rights of others, you vigorously support the police; but if their actions cause a restriction of your rights, you go against them.

Nothing wrong with it, but I think it is you who is sometimes inconsistent, not me.

First, there is no secret I am not a supporter of American military policy and have never supported any actions taken by them since the illegal overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 to the present.  In the example of Captain Crozier, as I commented to Ren, I supported the heroic actions of a commanding officer in the US Navy, DEFYING his mission as part of its military policy in the region, in order to protect the men and women under his command.  In this case, my support of the actions of Captain Crozier did not go against any of my core beliefs.

In contrast, you have gone on record defending HPD and its officers in any officer involved shooting incidents with little concern whether the rights of those individuals shot were violated.  Most recently, you have also gone on record in defense of the right to own standard capacity magazines.  From your actions, it seems to me you have an inconsistent standard when it comes to the rights of individuals.  When actions of the police potentially violate the rights of others, you vigorously support the police; but if their actions cause a restriction of your rights, you go against them.

Nothing wrong with it, but I think it is you who is sometimes inconsistent, not me.

Please provide references to the "record" you referred to.

Most of the statements you blast me for are hyperbolic insinuations, mischaracterizations and straw arguments I never said, just so you can try to smear/taunt/troll me.

Please provide references to the "record" you referred to.

Most of the statements you blast me for are hyperbolic insinuations, mischaracterizations and straw arguments I never said, just so you can try to smear/taunt/troll me.

Relax, don't get excited.

Allow me to go on record to say that aside of the many things I have characterized you, I nevertheless find you as one of the most intelligent and knowledgeable people on this forum, despite our obvious differences and intense discussions and debates.

Until next time...

Relax, don't get excited.

Allow me to go on record to say that aside of the many things I have characterized you, I nevertheless find you as one of the most intelligent and knowledgeable people on this forum, despite our obvious differences and intense discussions and debates.

Until next time...

I'd like to have this authenticated and notarized ....