I believe there must be civil and criminals laws that would be in play.  Years from now, long after the election, there would be a settlement.

kind of like omnigun's bets...

kind of like omnigun's bets...

OMIGOD!   

I have you on ignore.  You're lucky if I give you the time of day, Troll Boy.   

Another example of zig zag, petty attack.
Of course you blocked me, you can’t handle direct questions.
Which you’ve shown over and over and over again.

Another example of zig zag, petty attack.
Of course you blocked me, you can’t handle direct questions.
Which you’ve shown over and over and over again.

i don't understand how he was able to answer you by quoting your post if he has you blocked
just sayin...

i don't understand how he was able to answer you by quoting your post if he has you blocked
just sayin...

There's a link under blocked posts in web browsers that say, "Show me the post."

In Tapatalk, I noticed you just see the number of hidden posts with no "override" to view them.

Just sayin...

There's a link under blocked posts in web browsers that say, "Show me the post."

Unfortunately in this website software, unlike others, if someone quotes a blocked liberal, you do see some of the garbage.

i do not tolerate liberals IRL, no reason to on internetz forums.

Two of these are just blatant leftist trolls thinking it great sport to attack and argue with thier enemies.  The other is just plain weird and creepy.

There's a link under blocked posts in web browsers that say, "Show me the post."

In Tapatalk, I noticed you just see the number of hidden posts with no "override" to view them.

Just sayin...

so you ignore the user, but still read their posts?
and have to do one additional step for every post?
just sayin...

so you ignore the user, but still read their posts?
and have to do one additional step for every post?
just sayin...

You were doing so well until now.  I guess I'll be ignoring you more since you're making this about me.

Go back to heads and clips.  It's what you do best.

You were doing so well until now.  I guess I'll be ignoring you more since you're making this about me.

Go back to heads and clips.  It's what you do best.

Bullets and magazines

You were doing so well until now.  I guess I'll be ignoring you more since you're making this about me.

Go back to heads and clips.  It's what you do best.

i'll let you have the last word then...

1987 Johnny Carson joke.

oops Let me try that again.

[the voter fraud organization video]

That can be taken two ways, neither of which is good for Biden.

1.  He actually meant they are committing voter fraud.  Not likely, but would be very bad (illegal) if true.

2.  He REALLY meant they have the most extensive voter fraud prevention, or investigation, organization in US history.  Why would we need the best voter fraud enforcement in US history when the Dems swear every single day of the week and TWICE on Sunday that there's no evidence of wide spread voter fraud?  I doubt seriously anything Joe organized could be credited with completely eradicating voter fraud from the US.  He can't even complete a sentence half the time he's talking, and he has total control over that!!

Do you know why they have so much trouble swimming? Because of unrealistic mandates placed on the post office by a republican congress and republican president.


https://theweek.com/articles/767184/how-george-bush-broke-post-office

"A lot of people point to the rise of email, as well as private competitors like FedEx. Certainly, all those things contribute to USPS's problems. But what's really dragging down the Postal Service is something else entirely.

Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006.

Passed by a Republican-led Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, the PAEA gave the Postal Service new accounting and funding rules for its retiree pension and health benefits. Up until 2006, the USPS funded those obligations on a pay-as-you-go-basis, pulling out of its pension fund and adding to it as retirees' costs came in. But the PAEA required the Postal Service to calculate all of its likely pension costs over the next 75 years, and then sock away enough money between 2007 and 2016 to cover most of them."


It is hard to demand the post office function like a business with no tax funding while simultaneously having the government placing such restrictive requirements on them. It's like putting extra weight on a swimmer and complaining they are having trouble swimming. I totally agree that government should be more efficient and smaller but the USPS would be safely above water if it weren't for the requirements.

After ENRON, didn't the government pass laws requiring pension fund investments be diversified, making it just as much of a burden on private business as they did the Post Office?  The underlying purpose of the laws are to make sure the pension plans are funded, and that pensioners and current employees are not left in the lurch by another collapse that takes their pensions with them.

Seems like an even playing field to me, unless you can find a comparison that shows evidence the USPS pension fund is being saddled with more strict rules than the private sector.  I'm betting the "new USPS rules" were added around the same time as the post-ENRON rules were passed for everyone else.

I've received 2 mail in ballots in 3 weeks for the same person (my neighbor).  Both have his name on it, but my address.  Maybe that guy doing fraud?  I gave it to him the both times.

Yeah, right...  this guy should be the leader of the United States.

Just out of curiosity, what is "Trunalimunumaprzure"? And exactly how would one go about mobilizing it?

Yeah, right...  this guy should be the leader of the United States.

Just out of curiosity, what is "Trunalimunumaprzure"? And exactly how would one go about mobilizing it?

C'mon man! You know the thing!

C'mon man! You know the thing!

Oh, yeah, pardon me. For a second there I forgot.