Do you believe the quarantine or lockdown to be unconstitutional and if so which parts and why?

I have been hearing this argument  from a lot of different places and I find it a very interesting question. Some law enforcement officers are saying they won't enforce the rules and we have seen armed rallies protesting some of the restrictions.

What I haven't seen much in the discussion is anyone really getting into the weeds to say which specific quarantine rules they believe are unconstitutional and explaining why. On top of that different states are making different types of proclamations so what we may be seeing here is slightly different that what people may be seeing in other states. Curious what people here think.

As a rule pretty much any Democrat sponsored law or rule is un-constitutional,
or anti-Constitutional.  They force you into courts that tie up your funds and
your life to get a resolution.
Never in history has a healthy population been imprisoned for the purpose
of "protecting" them.  You quarantine sick people.  The presumption that everyone is
"sick" in this case is nuts.  The only sick people are the Democrats. I don't mind if they
voluntarily lock themselves up, kill their main productive industry, and commit economic suicide,
if that is their choice.  I just refuse to get on that ship with them.

Red flag law is also unconstitutional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I wonder if people would protest and react the same if instead of rules about medical lockdown it was rules about what we could do during wartime. Say we had a blackout order because of enemy bombers incoming, would it be unconstitutional for them to stop us to go protest in front of the capital building with flashlights or that we couldn't have nighttime church services.

I wonder if people would protest and react the same if instead of rules about medical lockdown it was rules about what we could do during wartime. Say we had a blackout order because of enemy bombers incoming, would it be unconstitutional for them to stop us to go protest in front of the capital building with flashlights or that we couldn't have nighttime church services.

If we had enemy bombers hitting US soil, troop invasion would come after that. Wonder if the invading force would utilize local police to help round up the citizens. Like how the nazis used local police against their own.

Wonder if local police would provide a list of which citizens own firearms, where they live, and what is owned. Or wouls they destroy it prior to invasion?

Good thing only hawaii keeps such a list.

Offtopic

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

If we had enemy bombers hitting US soil, troop invasion would come after that. Wonder if the invading force would utilize local police to help round up the citizens. Like how the nazis used local police against their own.

Wonder if local police would provide a list of which citizens own firearms, where they live, and what is owned. Or wouls they destroy it prior to invasion?

Good thing only hawaii keeps such a list.

Offtopic

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

The initial orders were Constitutional as we were facing an extreme threat with limited resources and it affected the public in general.  The lockdown and quarantines were sketchy and I felt it went too far, but went I along with it cause who am I to know.    We peaked at the beginning of April, "flattened the curve" and it was apparent that the threat was overblown and the lockdown and quarantines needed to be lifted quickly or it'd be unconstitutional as the great threat wasn't there to justify it.

Quarantine and lockdowns are essentially house arrest without a trial.  It also prevents you from practicing other rights.  It should be narrowly tailored for the extreme situation.  Even martial law doesn't remove all rights, just the pertinent ones.

Here we are in June with partial lockdown and quarantines.  It's criminal and on purpose at this point.  Either the Government is incompetent or they're doing a very slow recovery on purpose to save face and make it so people think that a major catastrophe was averted.

My opinion is the Democrats/Trump Haters can't allow the economy to bounce back before Nov.  They know that the economy is Trump's #1 highlight so far.  If he's able to start a spectacular recovery in a few short months, there' no way the voters will swap him out for Biden -- the VP during the slowest recovery in US history.

Yes, they are purposely keeping the economy in the toilet until it's too late for Trump to do anything pre-election.  Then they'll blame it all on him.

If we had enemy bombers hitting US soil, troop invasion would come after that. Wonder if the invading force would utilize local police to help round up the citizens. Like how the nazis used local police against their own.

Wonder if local police would provide a list of which citizens own firearms, where they live, and what is owned. Or wouls they destroy it prior to invasion?

Good thing only hawaii keeps such a list.

Offtopic

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is...fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and of vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. And I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.
- Franklin D. Roosevelt