Are you sure about that bill number?
H.B. NO. 2744 - A BILL FOR AN ACT
The purpose of this Act is to prevent gun violence and save lives by establishing the Hawaii gun violence prevention center
within the University of Hawaii with a mission to bring law enforcement and medical stakeholders together to analyze related
data and develop evidence‑based strategies to prevent gun violence in Hawaii.
https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2020/bills/HB2744_.HTMBased on previous definitions, and recent court cases, the fact is, the AR-15 being split in an upper and lower receiver, means neither half conforms to the technical definition of firearm receiver.
By changing that definition, it would cover the "conflict" caused by the receiver's design.
This has nothing to do with safety or solving crimes, which has always been the rationale given for state gun registrations. It has everything to do with creating yet another speed bump for law-abiding gun buyers.
So, if I have a legally registered stripped AR lower, AFAIK that is a registered firearm. If I buy an upper receiver to build it out, I would have to register that firearm TWICE?
This is not a well thought-out bill (as usual). The only thing I think this offers is a way for the "ghost gun" 80% builders to have another part of the gun serialized and controlled.
If someone can mill a lower, I'm very confident the upper can be done just as, if not more, easily.