She made a lecture opposing LGBT views in 2016.
Please be more specific. What views? That's too ambiguous to be considered an argument based on religion.
She also said in her nomination the Constitution doesn't protect privacy and that statement is against all freedoms and even roe v Wade.
I have the same opinion, and it has NOTHING to do with religion (i'm not a practicing follower of any religion). Roe v Wade was BAD LAW. There is no such "Right to Privacy" in the Constitution. If you disagree, please point to the part of the Constitution that includes the word "privacy".
She was against affordable care act funding abortions too.
I'm against ACA forcing me to pay into any insurance plan that pays for abortions for other people. I want the freedom to buy a policy that does not include services I find immoral or nonessential. The ACA is a tax program. They said so before the Supreme Court. Therefore our taxes are being used to cover abortions, sex reassignment, transgender procedures, and other procedures we are all being forced to financially provide as members of the exchange. The Gov't wants us ALL to be on the ACA roles.
Then you gave that whole kingdom of God quote. So far plenty of evidence she's far right religious and it will influence her opinions.
That's your opinion and purely hypothetical. You have given no specific examples where she has ever done that. As a judge on the 7th circuit appellate, you should be able to find at least one example if what you said is true.
So far, you've failed to answer the question -- just like you have failed on other questions put to you. Nothing but hyperbolic bullshit.
