Fetal rights!

https://www.lifenews.com/2017/06/02/harvard-law-journal-concludes-unborn-babies-have-constitutional-rights/

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Fetal rights!

https://www.lifenews.com/2017/06/02/harvard-law-journal-concludes-unborn-babies-have-constitutional-rights/

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Women's rights!

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/abortion-bans-womens-health/

.

This topic  is a rabbit hole.

This topic  is a rabbit hole.

And TROLLING

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ll6012/someone_had_to_say_it/

Perfect response to the religious who don't approve of abortion.  100% agree this is what true freedom is.

If you use "I'm not religious" as a copout for rejecting any code of morality, that's not freedom.  That's Sociopathy.

You still to this day haven't been able to define when sentience begins.  So, your endorsement is for an adult's "freedom of choice" even though they are murdering another human being.

You really are twisted.

If you use "I'm not religious" as a copout for rejecting any code of morality, that's not freedom.  That's Sociopathy.

You still to this day haven't been able to define when sentience begins.  So, your endorsement is for an adult's "freedom of choice" even though they are murdering another human being.

You really are twisted.

You haven't been able to prove that they are sentient.  Same ole wheel.  Just like you can't prove or disprove God.  So until a method comes up.  Keep to yourself and your beliefs is all I and millions others ask.

You haven't been able to prove that they are sentient.  Same ole wheel.  Just like you can't prove or disprove God.  So until a method comes up. Keep to yourself and your beliefs is all I and millions others ask.

yet it's ok for you to spout off your belives over and over again...
hello pot?

yet it's ok for you to spout off your belives over and over again...
hello pot?

You can believe the earth is flat for all I care.  Just don't force others to believe the same thing.  Both sides can still preach all they want to convince others that's the 1st amendment. Just like I believe in vaccines but I don't support forcing anyone to get one.   

You haven't been able to prove that they are sentient.  Same ole wheel.  Just like you can't prove or disprove God.  So until a method comes up.  Keep to yourself and your beliefs is all I and millions others ask.

You don't have to believe in God to understand that killing a human being is murder.  And if you can't disprove a fetus is sentient, then you can't say you are not committing murder.

"I didn't know" isn't a very good defense against killing unborn babies.

You don't have to believe in God to understand that killing a human being is murder.  And if you can't disprove a fetus is sentient, then you can't say you are not committing murder.

"I didn't know" isn't a very good defense against killing unborn babies.

I don't view it as a "human".  Its not murder to me and millions of others.  The burden of evidence is on you.  To ban something you must first PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that its wrong.

.

I don't view it as a "human".  Its not murder to me and millions of others.  The burden of evidence is on you.  To ban something you must first PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that its wrong.

Science differs with your viewpoint.

You -- of all people -- should never be the litmus test for what's legal, moral or ethical.

I'm not the one committing murder.  The burden is on you for pushing a false narrative that sentience is unknowable and should therefore be ignored -- even though that's the primary factor YOU SAID needs to be considered.

You created a catch-22, then decided the default answer should be abortion.

someone lacked attention during adolescent development

someone lacked attention during adolescent development

And refuses to play catch-up. 

Maybe professional therapy?

You can believe the earth is flat for all I care.  Just don't force others to believe the same thing.  Both sides can still preach all they want to convince others that's the 1st amendment. Just like I believe in vaccines but I don't support forcing anyone to get one.

that's not what you said before...

You haven't been able to prove that they are sentient.  Same ole wheel.  Just like you can't prove or disprove God.  So until a method comes up.  Keep to yourself and your beliefs is all I and millions others ask.

Why don't you have a talk with your Mom and ask her when she was carrying you?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Science differs with your viewpoint.

You -- of all people -- should never be the litmus test for what's legal, moral or ethical.

I'm not the one committing murder.  The burden is on you for pushing a false narrative that sentience is unknowable and should therefore be ignored -- even though that's the primary factor YOU SAID needs to be considered.

You created a catch-22, then decided the default answer should be abortion.

This simply doesn't work like that. Why does your opinion get to be default?  By definition you put the burden of your beliefs on others.  Lets say Christians and Muslims believe sex before marriage is bad.  Can they ban everyone from having sex before marriage?  No, they can follow their own customs and don't force legality, morality or ethics upon others.

Why don't you have a talk with your Mom and ask her when she was carrying you?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

it hasn't been proven in a court of law that omnigrub is sentient...