i'm guessing he votes for the candidates that are likely to support lots of state jobs...

Or killing thousands of jobs then telling said jobless to learn something else is not mean.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Name what results that u like?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Abortion related policies.  Vaccine policies.  Global political policies.   Eco/gas policies.  The world has a more favorable opinion of us. Said FU to china recently in the g2 summit.  Isn't Putin's friend.  I think he handled the covid crisis pretty decent.  He's pro choice and pro freedom of rights. 

Mostly the main things I disagree is just gun and immigration policies so far.  Oh and the BLM and race relations.  Though might be forgetting some.


Trump was anti abortion,  and had unfavorable environmental policies.  He also was hated on the world stage with an unfavorable opinion.  He fucked up on China and Russia.  He did good on vaccine and immigration.  At the same time other than the vaccine he mostly handled Covid unfavorably (except the very beginning where he rightfully banned flights).  He was neutral on gun policies. 

Hahahahahaha

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Hahahahahaha

Results?  What's that?

Symbolism over substance.

Results?  What's that?

Symbolism over substance.

Sounds like Trump 

"Make America great again",  great slogan.  No results. 

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

AMEN! MF.
You want to butcher your mistakes, YOU pay for it! not me.
I say that as a stepfather, that raised, and loves a "Mistake".

Doesn't work like that.   There's many things I don't support that my tax dollars gets used for.   😒  That's just life.   

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

a liar...glad we don't have anyone like this on this forum...

a liar...glad we don't have anyone like this on this forum...

Trumps the biggest liar of them all.  Remember don't be hypocritical.  Stand by your statement. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/trump-in-1999-i-am-very-pro-choice-480297539914

Trumps the biggest liar of them all.  Remember don't be hypocritical.  Stand by your statement. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/trump-in-1999-i-am-very-pro-choice-480297539914

Doesn't understand the difference between a lie and changing ones opinion.

Doesn't understand the difference between a lie and changing ones opinion.

Apparently to ren, one can't.  Read his post, read it again slowly, then read it one last time. 

Apparently to ren, one can't.  Read his post, read it again slowly, then read it one last time. 

#doesntknowhowtousereaditagainslowlyphrase
#doesntknowhowtousefocus
#doesntecon101
#etc...

Strong majority of Americans believe abortion should be restricted after three months of pregnancy

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/strong-majority-americans-believe-abortion-should-be-restricted-after-three-months

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Strong majority of Americans believe abortion should be restricted after three months of pregnancy

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/strong-majority-americans-believe-abortion-should-be-restricted-after-three-months

Not a new revelation.

How Democrats purged ‘safe, legal, rare’ from the party
The party’s absolutist stance on abortion is out of step with voters’ views.

November 15, 2019

That abortions should be “safe, legal and rare” was, until fairly recently, a common
Democratic talking point. Coined by President Bill Clinton, the phrase signaled his
desire to protect the supposed constitutional right to abortion while acknowledging
the views of people with moral qualms about the practice and perhaps even winning
a few of them over to his side. It helped cement Clinton’s reputation as a moderate.

Today, Democrats use the phrase at their peril. The party’s base appears unwilling
to tolerate a slogan that suggests abortion ought to be “rare,” hearing in it too much
of a concession to abortion opponents. As a result, most Democratic candidates have
erased from their rhetoric any hint that abortion might be a subject on which reasonable
people can disagree, and they’ve altered their policy proposals to match — endorsing
the repeal of all restrictions on paying for abortions with federal money, for example.
These moves might excite the party’s progressive base, but they put candidates
out of step with the average American and even with many of their own voters.

Even so, it makes little sense for Democrats to move so far left on this issue that they
leave behind general-election Democratic voters — never mind independents and wavering
Republicans. Nearly 30 percent of Democrats describe themselves as pro-life, according to
a recent Gallup poll. And while 77 percent “generally” support abortion rights in the first
trimester, Gallup finds, the number drops to 46 percent by the second semester and to a
paltry 18 percent by the third. (And Democratic women are actually more opposed to second-
and third-trimester abortions than Democratic men, these polls say.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/how-democrats-purged-safe-legal-rare-from-the-party/2019/11/15/369af73c-01a4-11ea-8bab-0fc209e065a8_story.html

Support for abortion by trimester based on DEMOCRAT respondent's answers:

1st:  77%
2nd:  46%
3rd:  18%

The numbers show how bipartisan the pro-life stance is.  It's not just a Republican position.

Strong majority of Americans believe abortion should be restricted after three months of pregnancy

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/strong-majority-americans-believe-abortion-should-be-restricted-after-three-months

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

I'm curious, would pro-lifers be ok with this compromise?