I’ve done no fact checking but if you can get charged for double homicide at conception then abortion after that point is murder.
How does that not follow logic ?
So charge them as such. (I mean the pregnant woman, doctor, nurses etc…)
Where’s  the attorney’s ?
Oh, wait. Technicalities.

So why are there no technicalities on those murder laws ?
Or are there ?

I’ve done no fact checking but if you can get charged for double homicide at conception then abortion after that point is murder.
How does that not follow logic ?
So charge them as such. (I mean the pregnant woman, doctor, nurses etc…)
Where’s  the attorney’s ?
Oh, wait. Technicalities.

So why are there no technicalities on those murder laws ?
Or are there ?

After you lied about me, I'm not answering another comment from you.

#NotFeedingThisLyingTroll
#AskOmniHowToUseGoogle

Maybe I over hyped the religious card but the ones who make laws about it cite it.  And a majority of those who are religious believe in pro life.   While I would argue a majority of non religious are pro choice. 

I’ve done no fact checking but if you can get charged for double homicide at conception then abortion after that point is murder.
How does that not follow logic ?
So charge them as such. (I mean the pregnant woman, doctor, nurses etc…)
Where’s  the attorney’s ?
Oh, wait. Technicalities.

So why are there no technicalities on those murder laws ?
Or are there ?

I think the diff between murder and not murder is context.  A mother making the call or a robber shooting her stomach and killing the baby.  A doctor getting permission from a family member to pull the plug vs. some crackhead going room to room pulling plugs.  So to answer your question, IMO it's context.  This isn't a perfect answer either, there really is no way to 100% define anything or make it ok.  Each person has their own morals/ethics and they will have to live with the decision they make.

I think the diff between murder and not murder is context.  A mother making the call or a robber shooting her stomach and killing the baby.  A doctor getting permission from a family member to pull the plug vs. some crackhead going room to room pulling plugs.  So to answer your question, IMO it's context.  This isn't a perfect answer either, there really is no way to 100% define anything or make it ok.  Each person has their own morals/ethics and they will have to live with the decision they make.

Sometimes I guess I do agree with you.  That's the whole idea of being pro-choice.

Sometimes I guess I do agree with you.  That's the whole idea of being pro-choice.

you belive that pro-life people don't subscribe to that idea?

you belive that pro-life people don't subscribe to that idea?

Yup.   Not exactly a choice if your are forced to do something.  You can believe it's alive, or it's not.  Do what you gotta do to sleep at night.   Why do you care about someone else?   You can't catch babies, you don't gotta take care of them.   It affects your life 0%. So you have no say.   


Same to a father,   he has no say in the women keeping or not keeping the baby.   Though if the women goes against his wishes he should not be liable to take care of the child. 

After you lied about me, I'm not answering another comment from you.

Unfortunately the evidence got deleted by the mods.
You now have deniability.
But great result.

Same to a father,   he has no say in the women keeping or not keeping the baby.   Though of the women goes against his wishes he should not be liable to take care of the child.

Interesting point.
If the father of the unborn is in favor of an abortion and the woman doesn’t get one should he have to pay child support ?

And I know nothing is 100% defined. But at some point it does turn into murder.
Legally, factually, not morally.
In my mind it’s dichotomous. Either totally illegal or legal to point of murder. (24 weeks.)
And any double homicide laws for pregnant mothers should reflect the same.

With all the exceptions for rape, molestation, health risk etc.

But then again absolute ban is moral/religious. Not science.
And in many peoples minds, allowing it is immoral.
Do miscarriages go to the after life ?
I don’t know.
It’s a wild topic.

Interesting point.
If the father of the unborn is in favor of an abortion and the woman doesn’t get one should he have to pay child support ?

And I know nothing is 100% defined. But at some point it does turn into murder.
Legally, factually, not morally.
In my mind it’s dichotomous. Either totally illegal or legal to point of murder. (24 weeks.)
And any double homicide laws for pregnant mothers should reflect the same.

With all the exceptions for rape, molestation, health risk etc.

But then again absolute ban is moral/religious. Not science.
And in many peoples minds, allowing it is immoral.
Do miscarriages go to the after life ?
I don’t know.
It’s a wild topic.

We can make it simple,  right now we hide behind the gray zone.  Just need to make a new law.  If it isn't functioning like a parasite its alive.  I also agree,  people should not be charged for double homicide. They could make a new law that if victims of crime belong to a special class they get longer sentences.  For example pregnant females are more vulnerable.  Crimes against the old/young etc. Similar like they have hate crime laws.

Also you bring an interesting point, if there are exemptions it really is about "morals/religious"  if a rapist gets a 14yr old girl pregnant that baby is the "same" scientifically as 2 consenting adults creating a child.

MFW mexico is more free than texas in this instance....

https://news.yahoo.com/mexico-supreme-court-rules-abortion-191835366.html

MFW mexico is more free than texas in this instance....

https://news.yahoo.com/mexico-supreme-court-rules-abortion-191835366.html

LOL!  Whenever the Left wants something, it's about "FREEDOM!!"

When they want to oppose something, it's time to make it illegal, ban it, boycott it and "make their lives miserable."

"Freedom for me, but not for thee."

If you fall for these "Freedom" arguments, you're pretty stupid.  They sure don't seem to care about the civil rights and freedoms of developing human beings.

LOL!  Whenever the Left wants something, it's about "FREEDOM!!"

When they want to oppose something, it's time to make it illegal, ban it, boycott it and "make their lives miserable."

"Freedom for me, but not for thee."

If you fall for these "Freedom" arguments, you're pretty stupid.  They sure don't seem to care about the civil rights and freedoms of developing human beings.

Developing.  Is the key word.  You "develop" a meal.  I don't see you eating raw steak cause it could become a meal.  Or better yet you better be a vegan. 

Also the freedom I am very clear.  Been saying it thousands of times but apparently you dont get it .  You can't have freedom if it affects others freedom.  Can't force a mother to give birth.

a·nal·o·gy
/əˈnaləjē/
Learn to pronounce
See definitions in:
All
Philosophy
Logic
Linguistics
Biology
noun
a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
"an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
a correspondence or partial similarity.
"the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"
a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
"works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"

Your analogies need some work. . . JMHO

a·nal·o·gy
/əˈnaləjē/
Learn to pronounce
See definitions in:
All
Philosophy
Logic
Linguistics
Biology
noun
a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
"an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
a correspondence or partial similarity.
"the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"
a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
"works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"

Your analogies need some work. . . JMHO

Many things of his need work.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Many things of his need work.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Baby steps.  Can't get to 3.7 in a day. . .

Santa Maria!

Massive earthquake hits Mexico on the day their Supreme Court decriminalized abortion


https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1435686242939723776

Your analogies need some work. . . JMHO

Calling the comparisons he posts "analogies" is being generous.

His main reason for posting so many bad analogies is he doesn't understand the subject at all, much less enough to lecture on it.  You can't easily compare/contrast one thing with another unless you already understand the first thing.

Calling the comparisons he posts "analogies" is being generous.

His main reason for posting so many bad analogies is he doesn't understand the subject at all, much less enough to lecture on it.  You can't easily compare/contrast one thing with another unless you already understand the first thing.
SNIP

There you go, being all rational. . . 

hehe