There's voter fraud and there's what is Constitutional. Not the same things being argued.
It is my understanding that the Constitution states that voting laws are to be decided by the State leg. Not a Gov, Sec of State, etc making up the rules. If you one can't see the issue there, then you're uber naive or purposely arguing for the sake of arguing. No matter who ends up being the winner, this is a damn mess. I'm more concerned that stuff like this has been happening all along, regardless of who ends up being "decided".
I, for one, and very interested (excited?) to see these issues being played out FINALLY. For too long, we let the winners decide if the WAY in which they won got investigated. Now, Trump is shining the light of transparency on the corrupt election practices in many states, forcing us to address the problems BEFORE we let those who stole the election have the reigns of power and ignore the problems.
Democrats tend to reward those who cheat to get them power. We need to break that cycle.
Many Constitutional "fail safes" ought to at least be argued this election. I want to see how the courts, state governments and the feds address these obviously unusual results. I think the Dems crossed the line between "just enough to win local elections" to "we need to ramp up our cheating because Trump is way ahead." They got caught because the prize, and the needed "correction," was bigger than ever. We'll see if the "system" holds anyone accountable. Just giving Trump the win is not enough. The election system across the country needs to be at the very least certified by a federal agency using independent professional businesses.
We need many layers of monitoring of elections. One state or federal group will not work. Maybe using taxes to fund each party, at least Dems and GOP, to provide their own election system certification team would be a start?