A Georgia state legislator just tested the Georgia signature match verification process re receiving his mail-in ballot for the upcoming Senate run-off election in January. Nothing to see here? Not verified by successful litigation? Like to see the dumbass explain how such a non-verification process isn't ripe for abuse. And if you look at the numbers/percentage of rejected ballots due to unconfirmed matching signatures from previous elections (with merely 20% as many ballots as the recent election) to the impossibly lower rejection rate from this election... uh... it adds up. It certainly requires a thorough audit and full investigation in all the counties of Georgia (not just the one partial audit in the one county Raffensberger specifically selected because it's a Republican county and will likely have fewer fraudulent ballot signatures).




Georgia State Legislator Received Absentee Ballot After Submitting Request Using Different Signature Than on Photo ID

https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/16/georgia-state-representative-received-absentee-ballot-after-submitting-request-using-different-signature-than-on-photo-id/

In an interview with The Georgia Star News, Dolezal explained that he took initiative to test signature matching because he suspected that elected officials were making broad claims without examining the evidence themselves.

“I chuckle, but it really is appalling. What’s appalling to me is we have all this question around signature match and all these elected officials saying that there’s been no evidence of any issues. I decided to test the system, and I kind of made the most ridiculous example I could, using myself,” stated Dolezal.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced on Monday that their office would conduct an audit of absentee ballot signatures in Cobb County, followed by a statewide audit. However, Raffensperger noted in a press conference that the decision to hold these audits wasn’t because signature matching was flawed.

Dolezal told The Star News that Raffensperger’s claim may not be entirely accurate.

“I don’t know how he can make that statement. As far as I’m aware, he hasn’t looked at any signatures. The reality is, he needs to cast a wider net for the audit,” stated Dolezal. “The interesting thing is, there’s 159 counties in Georgia, and the counties handle signature matching. I think my board of directors is fantastic. My suspicion is that, if my county missed that application with a pretty egregious signature mistake, then I wonder about other counties. Just anecdotally, I think we get the best things done in our county. We’ve got the best schools, and we’re the wealthiest county in the state. So I would suspect that if we did the signature audit everywhere like we’ve been asking for the last month, we’d find more issues.”

I saw somewhere, been too busy this morning to do much reading/videos. Been trying to shop for new insurance. 

Anyway I saw something about them confiscating the Dominion Voting machines today in Maricopa County. They have probably all been wiped clean by now. But who knows. Maybe we’ll see some results from the audits.

I saw somewhere, been too busy this morning to do much reading/videos. Been trying to shop for new insurance. 

Anyway I saw something about them confiscating the Dominion Voting machines today in Maricopa County. They have probably all been wiped clean by now. But who knows. Maybe we’ll see some results from the audits.

Can't they rebuild the memory or do I watch to many movies?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

A Georgia state legislator just tested the Georgia signature match verification process re receiving his mail-in ballot for the upcoming Senate run-off election in January. Nothing to see here? Not verified by successful litigation? Like to see the dumbass explain how such a non-verification process isn't ripe for abuse. And if you look at the numbers/percentage of rejected ballots due to unconfirmed matching signatures from previous elections (with merely 20% as many ballots as the recent election) to the impossibly lower rejection rate from this election... uh... it adds up. It certainly requires a thorough audit and full investigation in all the counties of Georgia (not just the one partial audit in the one county Raffensberger specifically selected because it's a Republican county and will likely have fewer fraudulent ballot signatures).




Georgia State Legislator Received Absentee Ballot After Submitting Request Using Different Signature Than on Photo ID

https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/16/georgia-state-representative-received-absentee-ballot-after-submitting-request-using-different-signature-than-on-photo-id/

In an interview with The Georgia Star News, Dolezal explained that he took initiative to test signature matching because he suspected that elected officials were making broad claims without examining the evidence themselves.

“I chuckle, but it really is appalling. What’s appalling to me is we have all this question around signature match and all these elected officials saying that there’s been no evidence of any issues. I decided to test the system, and I kind of made the most ridiculous example I could, using myself,” stated Dolezal.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced on Monday that their office would conduct an audit of absentee ballot signatures in Cobb County, followed by a statewide audit. However, Raffensperger noted in a press conference that the decision to hold these audits wasn’t because signature matching was flawed.

Dolezal told The Star News that Raffensperger’s claim may not be entirely accurate.

“I don’t know how he can make that statement. As far as I’m aware, he hasn’t looked at any signatures. The reality is, he needs to cast a wider net for the audit,” stated Dolezal. “The interesting thing is, there’s 159 counties in Georgia, and the counties handle signature matching. I think my board of directors is fantastic. My suspicion is that, if my county missed that application with a pretty egregious signature mistake, then I wonder about other counties. Just anecdotally, I think we get the best things done in our county. We’ve got the best schools, and we’re the wealthiest county in the state. So I would suspect that if we did the signature audit everywhere like we’ve been asking for the last month, we’d find more issues.”

Fake news because nothing was proven in court.  BRB, logging in again to see all the hot milfs who want to party in a 1 mile radius.  There are 20 of them.

Can't they rebuild the memory or do I watch to many movies?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

These people are experts at hiding/destroying any evidence of wrong doing.  So the fact that the machines were sitting for over a month, gives plenty of time to raise suspect.  Could also have been replaced.  That's why this should have been done within days, not weeks.

Can't they rebuild the memory or do I watch to many movies?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

There is two types of computer memory. One (ROM) is preprogrammed with specific firmware for running the computer. If the power is shut off it retains the programming. But it does not usually keep track of all the things the computer did prior. The other (RAM) would have a lot of information as to what the computer was doing the last time it was turned on but once you turn it off everything is gone. So no it can’t be done. However, you may be thinking about storage or your hard drive. In which case, yes as long as too much of the information has not been overwritten by other information you could recover some pertinent logs and/or records even if it was just “Deleted”.

This is a real general high level description. I could get into a lot more detail but it will cost you. 

For those concerned about any and all evidence of election and voter irregularities and possible fraud please consider sending emails to President Trump and Rand Paul.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Please immediately appoint two independent counsels/special prosecutors that will be fully funded and have subpoena and criminal prosecution abilities to thoroughly investigate 1. Election irregularities from November 3 and following days, especially in states where evidence of fraud has been presented, and 2. the possible criminal and national security issues re the Biden family.



https://www.paul.senate.gov/connect/email-rand

Please stand up for we American citizens who want only legal votes to count in our elections by joining Rep. Brooks on January 6 and object to the acceptance of electors from all the states where significant evidence of voter and election irregularities have been revealed.

For those concerned about any and all evidence of election and voter irregularities and possible fraud please consider sending emails to President Trump and Rand Paul.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Please immediately appoint two independent counsels/special prosecutors that will be fully funded and have subpoena and criminal prosecution abilities to thoroughly investigate 1. Election irregularities from November 3 and following days, especially in states where evidence of fraud has been presented, and 2. the possible criminal and national security issues re the Biden family.



https://www.paul.senate.gov/connect/email-rand

Please stand up for we American citizens who want only legal votes to count in our elections by joining Rep. Brooks on January 6 and object to the acceptance of electors from all the states where significant evidence of voter and election irregularities have been revealed.

Done. He’s probably tired of hearing from me. 

Rep. Mo Brooks vows ‘I will not surrender’ election fraud fight

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/rep-mo-brooks-vows-i-will-not-surrender-election-fraud-fight

The leader of a House bid to challenge the Electoral College election of Joe Biden said that he is “cautiously optimistic” of winning the needed support in the Senate to fight on despite Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s urging to have President Trump step aside.

Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks said he expects the support of at least one senator when he moves next month to challenge the electoral votes of several states in which the Trump campaign has claimed election fraud. Without a Senate ally, the effort fails.

“I'm cautiously optimistic that there will be one or more United States senators who will fight to reject voter fraud and election theft,” he said in an interview.

Sens. Rand Paul and Kelly Loeffler are rumored to be considering a vote to reject some state electoral tallies. In a Senate hearing today, Paul said "fraud happened."

AT today's hearing Senator Johnson has some comments on election irregularities and the baseless unfounded "Russian disinformation" bullshit propaganda conspiracy theory the Democrats spewed for years.

Wish we'd see more of this attitude from the mostly meek spineless Republicans.

AT today's hearing Senator Johnson has some comments on election irregularities and the baseless unfounded "Russian disinformation" bullshit propaganda conspiracy theory the Democrats spewed for years.

Wish we'd see more of this attitude from the mostly meek spineless Republicans.

This is what I just can't understand you literally are complaining this whole tread on mass fraud while now calling the democrats mass fraud/russian claims bullshit.  You both were/are claiming similar things...but them doing so is bullshit?   

FYI democrats were disproven early on, but took them years to realize it and even some don't till this day.

This is what I just can't understand you literally are complaining this whole tread on mass fraud while now calling the democrats mass fraud/russian claims bullshit.  You both were/are claiming similar things...but them doing so is bullshit?   

FYI democrats were disproven early on, but took them years to realize it and even some don't till this day.

You really can't control yourself from posting BS rants on this thread, can you?

 

Why are Democrats not as concerned about fraud in the election, but Republicans are?

Is it because the Democrats know they are the ones doing it?  It does seem that the Democrats benefit more often from all the fraud and "election anomalies" than Republicans.

The Presidential race is just ONE race on the ballot.  Any ballots illegally counted or changed by counters to a total-party ballot also hurts down-ballot races for Republicans.

Why are Democrats not as concerned about fraud in the election, but Republicans are?

Is it because the Democrats know they are the ones doing it?  It does seem that the Democrats benefit more often from all the fraud and "election anomalies" than Republicans.

The Presidential race is just ONE race on the ballot.  Any ballots illegally counted or changed by counters to a total-party ballot also hurst down-ballot races for Republicans.

Same reason why they're calling for unity now instead of over the past 4 years.  I had a very stumped question for someone with TDS.  I told them so just because someone in office that you claim spews hate, that gives you the green light to spew hate/riot/loot as well?  Trump/1 man doesn't control someones actions, everyone is responsible for their own actions. They were very silent after that rational.

Senator Hawley goes off today in the Senate hearing. Hold the line!

Well, it sounds like there is some traction to the rumor I heard today. Thanks for verifying it. Like I said in a previous post. In the next week we are going to see how this is going to play out. If those machines are fraudulent and the Republicans here have some cahones and decertify AZ’s election results then you will see the other states follow suit IMO.

Sounds like the states are now racing each other to de certify their electoral votes!!

Why are Democrats not as concerned about fraud in the election, but Republicans are?

Is it because the Democrats know they are the ones doing it?  It does seem that the Democrats benefit more often from all the fraud and "election anomalies" than Republicans.

The Presidential race is just ONE race on the ballot.  Any ballots illegally counted or changed by counters to a total-party ballot also hurts down-ballot races for Republicans.

WARNING! CONSPIRACY THEORY BELOW! 

I threw in the warning half kidding and half serious due to what I am going to say here. I keep hearing that there is some evidence out there somewhere that shows CA actually went for Trump. And that the Trump team felt they couldn’t get to the Dominion Voting Machines quick enough to prove it. What I heard about the proof were logs obtained from a server somewhere. The problem is that without the machine to verify the logs it is just another electronic file that can be manipulated. And with CA being so anti Trump I am sure if there was evidence in the machines it was wiped clean shortly after the election. The other thing I have been discussing on another board is a local race that everyone feels should have been won by the Republican candidate. We all feel if the presidential election results was fraudulently changed then the local extremely hard fought and well funded by the Democrats election could have also been changed. And now that more and more fraud evidence keeps coming out we are sad the Republican candidate already conceded the election. Because now that AZ is doing an audit of the Dominion machines if they find fraud in the presidential election, we will also find fraud in the local election.

Sounds like the states are now racing each other to de certify their electoral votes!!

This is the main reason so many state legislatures submitted competing electoral slates this week.  They want to ensure the legal options for Trump remain open.  Having 2 opposing slates of electors for a state offers the Senate President the option to decide which to accept.

This is going to go down to the wire.  Anyone crying and screaming that Trump needs to concede already obviously missed the NEWS saying Hillary "I was robbed!" Clinton told Joe Biden to not concede the election under any circumstances.

Funny how that was okay, but Trump actually taking her advice is "a coup"?   

This is the main reason so many state legislatures submitted competing electoral slates this week.  They want to ensure the legal options for Trump remain open.  Having 2 opposing slates of electors for a state offers the Senate President the option to decide which to accept.

This is going to go down to the wire.  Anyone crying and screaming that Trump needs to concede already obviously missed the NEWS saying Hillary "I was robbed!" Clinton told Joe Biden to not concede the election under any circumstances.

Funny how that was okay, but Trump actually taking her advice is "a coup"?   

Everyone saying its over for Trump because they never learned about the constitution. 

2020 is one heck of a year

Everyone saying its over for Trump because they never learned about the constitution. 

2020 is one heck of a year

Here, here...

https://republicanstory.com/trump-attorney-jenna-ellis-were-gonna-fight-regardless-of-what-happens-come-january-6/

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk