Our (arms rights advocates) friend John Lott gets into the fraudulent voting issue with an academic paper...

Full 25-page paper free download at site:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3756988

A Simple Test for the Extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data

John R. Lott

Abstract

This study provides measures of vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election. It first compares Fulton county’s precincts that are adjacent to similar precincts in neighboring counties that had no allegations of fraud to isolate the impact of Fulton county’s vote-counting process (including potential fraud). In measuring the difference in President Trump’s vote share of the absentee ballots for these adjacent precincts, we account for the difference in his vote share of the in-person voting and the difference in registered voters’ demographics. The best estimate shows an unusual 7.81% drop in Trump’s percentage of the absentee ballots for Fulton County alone of 11,350 votes, or over 80% of Biden’s vote lead in Georgia. The same approach is applied to Allegheny County in Pennsylvania for both absentee and provisional ballots. The estimated number of fraudulent votes from those two sources is about 55,270 votes.

Second, vote fraud can increase voter turnout rate. Increased fraud can take many forms: higher rates of filling out absentee ballots for people who hadn’t voted, dead people voting, ineligible people voting, or even payments to legally registered people for their votes. However, the increase might not be as large as the fraud if votes for opposing candidates are either lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate. The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 “excess” votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Adding Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, the total increases to up to 289,000 excess votes.

Video at: https://twitter.com/i/status/1344017171844747266

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-trump-campaign-files-wisconsin-case-to-u-s-supreme-court/

Trump legal team files Wisconsin case to U.S. Supreme Court…

Mayor Rudolph J. Giuliani, the Trump campaign’s lead attorney, today announced that the campaign filed a petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that allowed over 50,000 illegal absentee ballots in violation of Article II of the U.S. Constitution and Wisconsin law.  The filing seeks expedited consideration before the January 6 Congressional review of the Electoral College votes.  This marks the second Constitutional challenge to illegal mail voting filed by the Campaign, following a petition from Pennsylvania filed on December 20.

According to President Trump’s lead Wisconsin attorney, Jim Troupis: “Regrettably, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, in their 4-3 decision, refused to address the merits of our claim.  This ‘Cert Petition’ asks them to address our claims, which, if allowed, would change the outcome of the election in Wisconsin.” Troupis noted, “Three members of the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, agreed with many of the President’s claims in written dissents from that court’s December 14 order.”

Professor John Eastman, a constitutional scholar at the Claremont Institute, also noted: “The petition challenging the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court to allow partisan state and local election officials to ignore key anti-fraud provisions of Wisconsin law is extremely persuasive. The federal constitutional issues raised by the case cannot be more clear. Article II of the Constitution, as interpreted in Bush v. Gore, assigns to the ‘legislature’ the plenary power to determine the manner of choosing presidential electors, not executive officials, un-elected bureaucrats, or even the state’s judiciary. That authority was eviscerated in Wisconsin, resulting in more than 50,000 illegal ballots being cast and counted.”

The Trump Petition raises a number of issues, including:

– More than 28,000 votes were counted from people who failed to provide identification by abusing the state’s “indefinitely confined” status, including two Biden electors.

– Nearly 6,000 absentee ballots were counted that were contained in incomplete and altered ballot envelopes that the Wisconsin statutes expressly forbid.

– More than 17,000 ballots were collected by hand, in direct contravention of the statutes, in Democrat-sponsored events in Madison in September and October.​​


Click here to read the Petition: https://donaldtrumpcampaign.createsend1.com/t/r-l-juhhktdk-uklhktdua-y/

 

Click here to read the Motion for Expedited Consideration: https://donaldtrumpcampaign.createsend1.com/t/r-l-juhhktdk-uklhktdua-j/

28-minute interview with former Kansas AG...

https://ugetube.com/watch/phill-kline-new-amistad-project-election-lawsuit-500-mil-to-increase-votes-in-dem-strongholds_La5zhEd4WovX73M.html

Phill Kline: New Amistad Project Election Lawsuit; $500 Mil to Increase Votes in Dem Strongholds?

Joining us today is Phill Kline, the former attorney general of Kansas and director of the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society. Kline argues that hundreds of millions of dollars were donated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to nonprofits, which used them in ways that compromised election standards. According to an Amistad Project report, election officials who received Zuckerberg’s money put their thumbs on the scale by trying to increase voter turnout in only democratic strongholds.

We discuss ongoing efforts to expose election fraud, and we break down Amistad Project’s most recent lawsuit, which demands that legislatures in five states be allowed to certify electors prior to congressional certification.

Okay folks, wrap it up. Head home. It's all over. This proves there were no irregularities of any kind in Georgia (nor likely anywhere else you demented conspiracy theorists), especially re signature matching. The GBI (fine fellows all) investigated a sample of over 15,000 ballots and found only two discrepancies, and that was a wife signing for herself and her husband, so no foul play really. It was really 100% accurate, not a mere 99.99%!

Now, exactly how that comports with the commonly seen typical 1% - 6% rejection rate of mail-in ballots (the 6% range being for areas having mail-in for the first time, LIKE GEORGIA, can be tossed aside as not being an astounding anomaly (6% vs. .01%... i.e. as much as 600 TIMES fewer "errors") due to the remarkably amazingly astute intelligence of the voters of Georgia... or something... but DEFINITELY nothing suspicious or possibly illegal! smh.

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/cobb-county-signature-audit/

COBB COUNTY SIGNATURE AUDIT…

Raffensperger Says Signature Match Audit Found No Evidence of Voter Fraud in Cobb County

99.99% Accuracy Rate

Only 2 Out of 15,118 Signatures Identified as Problem

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger released his report last night claiming the signature match audit found ‘no evidence of voter fraud in Cobb County.’

Read the Cobb County audit report: https://sos.ga.gov/admin/uploads/Cobb%20County%20ABM%20Audit%20Report%2020201229.pdf

Based on the results of the audit, the Cobb County Elections Department had a 99.99% accuracy rate in performing correct signature verification procedures. The audit team was also able to confirm that the two ballots that should have initially been identified by Cobb County Elections Department staff as requiring a cure notification were actually cast by the voters to whom they were issued. No fraudulent absentee ballots were identified during the audit.

Independent monitors were barred from the audit.

But what was the calibration on the signature machines?  Of course it would be very accurate if the tolerances were set very low.

But what was the calibration on the signature machines?  Of course it would be very accurate if the tolerances were set very low.

They only did a statistically significant sample of ballots.

The real question is, who selected the ballots for the sample?

in my lifetime of dealing with data, an "audit" does not entail a sampling.  Computers can process an entire dataset no matter the size or complexity.  Audits in my world not only implies, but REQUIRES, a 100% record-by-record verification.

Imagine the IRS doing an audit of MicroSoft or Google and only looking through a statistically significant sample of their accounting records.  Not going to happen.  They will want to see the data for every line item in a spreadsheet, not only making sure the columns and rows add up, but also that the source documents for line items of interest are all present and in order.

Audit?  More like smoke and mirrors.

Audit?  More like smoke and mirrors.

Does the implying of smoke and mirrors require a conviction though?

You can't make this shit up!

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-dominion-machines-hacked-live-during-georgia-election-hearing/

Dominion machines hacked LIVE during Georgia state senate committee election hearing…

I guess Hawley has been convinced by the wild baseless conspiracy theories that there is "probably cause" to examine the election processes and results in various states. A guy from "The Show Me" state wants a full on show and tell.  Let's hope he keeps to his word and that many other senators join him in the coming days.

Oh, yeah, and fuck Mitch McConnell.

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/first-senator-josh-hawley-announces-he-will-object-to-electoral-college-results-on-jan-6/

FIRST SENATOR — Josh Hawley announces he will object to Electoral College results on Jan 6…

Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri said Wednesday he will object on Jan. 6 to President-elect Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory. His objection guarantees a voice for President Trump, who argued in lawsuits that fraud handed narrow wins to Biden in swing states.

“Following both the 2004 and 2016 elections, Democrats in Congress objected during the certification of electoral votes in order to raise concerns about election integrity. They were praised by Democratic leadership and the media when they did,” Hawley said in a statement. “And they were entitled to do so. But now those of us concerned about the integrity of this election are entitled to do the same.”

Hawley added: “I cannot vote to certify the electoral college results on January 6 without raising the fact that some states, particularly Pennsylvania, failed to follow their own state election laws. And I cannot vote to certify without pointing out the unprecedented effort of mega corporations, including Facebook and Twitter, to interfere in this election, in support of Joe Biden. At the very least, Congress should investigate allegations of voter fraud and adopt measures to secure the integrity of our elections.”

Some House Republicans already said they would object to the results, but they needed a senator’s objection to trigger actual floor votes on whether to accept the outcome.

After the challenge is made, the House and Senate vote independently on whether to accept the Electoral College results, which went 306-232 for Biden. Because Democrats will hold the House, the objection will likely be defeated. Both chambers must accept a challenge.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has pleaded with senators not to object, saying it would force Republicans to oppose Trump. McConnell told colleagues this month it would be a “terrible vote” for Republicans.

I guess the Georgia senate committee heard enough... but they likely fell for the baseless conspiracy theories being constantly proffered by the traitorous nut cases attempting a coup of the single digit midget.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/georgia-senate-judiciary-subcommittee-unanimously-passes-motion-audit-fulton-countys-absentee-ballots-using-method-outlined-jovan-pulitzer/

Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Unanimously Passes Motion to Audit Fulton County’s Absentee Ballots Using Method Outlined by Jovan Pulitzer

Members of Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday held a hearing to study Georgia’s Election Laws, and their past and present impact on the current Election cycle.

The star of the show on Wednesday was inventor Jovan Pulitzer.

Pulitzer explained how he could quickly audit their results using his technique of identifying fraudulent paper ballots and said he will do it for free.

Mr. Pulitzer said he has “no regard for the smoke and mirrors of how the machines work.” – IT’S ALL ABOUT THE PAPER BALLOTS.

“I don’t care about the machine. I don’t even care about the code that was written in the machine. What I care about is that physical artifact [ballot] and that physical artifact has material differences district to district that should not be there.”

Pulitzer said it would take him two hours to look at 500,000 ballots.

The Georgia State Senate Judiciary Subcommittee unanimously passed a motion to audit Fulton County’s absentee ballots with the process Pulitzer outlined during today’s hearing.

I guess the Georgia senate committee heard enough... but they likely fell for the baseless conspiracy theories being constantly proffered by the traitorous nut cases attempting a coup of the single digit midget.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/georgia-senate-judiciary-subcommittee-unanimously-passes-motion-audit-fulton-countys-absentee-ballots-using-method-outlined-jovan-pulitzer/

Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Unanimously Passes Motion to Audit Fulton County’s Absentee Ballots Using Method Outlined by Jovan Pulitzer

I watched this guy's video earlier outlining all the tests he can use to determine the probability that a ballot is genuine and completed by a voter versus mass reproduced, printed outside the state's production runs, or completed with a given writing instrument vs. printer, etc.

Sounds like, if he's really allowed to work his sorcery on an entire county's ballots, it'll put to rest the "feeling" that the ballot boxes were "stuffed" by the Democrats.

I always go back to the same thing: why do nearly all known incidents of fraud, errors, glitches and anomalies favor a single party?  You'd think, after all the down-ballot races won by Republicans, the Democrats would be just as interested in double-checking the integrity of elections as anyone.

I watched this guy's video earlier outlining all the tests he can use to determine the probability that a ballot is genuine and completed by a voter versus mass reproduced, printed outside the state's production runs, or completed with a given writing instrument vs. printer, etc.

Sounds like, if he's really allowed to work his sorcery on an entire county's ballots, it'll put to rest the "feeling" that the ballot boxes were "stuffed" by the Democrats.

I always go back to the same thing: why do nearly all known incidents of fraud, errors, glitches and anomalies favor a single party?  You'd think, after all the down-ballot races won by Republicans, the Democrats would be just as interested in double-checking the integrity of elections as anyone.

Since they (the Democrats and their media lackeys)  are so completely convinced that it's all so baseless, you'd think they'd be chomping at the bit to do all the forensic and other examinations of the purported (fake) "evidence" just to prove what liars and deluded mental cases the President's supporters are in claiming widespread "irregularities". Yet at every turn they either ignore the opportunity to prove their case or they actively oppose any and all efforts to have objective investigations into the baseless charges. Now why would they do that? I'd say "that doesn't make sense", except 1. the lefties have a strong and long historical pattern of not making sense, and 2. they're a bunch of lying hypocrites and know it and are just (as usual) putting on a media show for the uber-gullible sheeple who wouldn't know real evidence when it is staring them straight in the face... obviously.

Scott Adams: “The computer nerds found the kraken. Looks like Trump won.”

https://electionwiz.com/2021/01/01/scott-adams-the-computer-nerds-found-the-kraken-looks-like-trump-won

He is referring to this:

BREAKING: Irrefutable [?] evidence presented by expert witnesses from the GA hearing showing that [based on the data that was provided and used on election night] votes were removed and/or flipped from Trump to Biden

https://mobile.twitter.com/Rothbard1776/status/1344374207979913216

Still doesn't explain why the hand count which doesn't involve machines had the same results....

.

Still doesn't explain why the hand count which doesn't involve machines had the same results....

I watched a cellphone video taken by one of the recount workers.  The supervisor said, "I know some on you and the GOP leaders have concerns about the ballots, but all we need right now is for you to count the ballots in the stacks on the table.  Don't worry about the markings or anything else.  We just need a count of all the ballots."

So, yeah.  If you count all the illegal ballots 100 times, you're still going to get the same number.

And the audits they are doing in many instances are statistical samplings (samples selected by whom?), and then extrapolated -- not a true audit.

We keep posting these facts, but here you are -- still unable to remember them ... assuming you took time to read and comprehend them.

One question the GA Sec of State and Gov are not answering is why the first recount was done by hand and not with the machines?  In all states, the first recount is always done using the tabulating machines.  This is for speed and to verify the first tallies had no "glitches" in the hardware that caused numbers to be inconsistent from run to run.

By doing only hand recounts, GA is bypassing that "sanity check" of the machines.  Perhaps the sworn testimony of watching workers run stacks of ballots through multiple times and introducing uncontrolled USB sticks with un=observed files of votes is why.  If they can't replicate the same tampering steps the same way in each county's ballot counts, then the numbers won't match.  But, if they do it by hand, there's only the numbers reported by workers, then the numbers (not necessarily the same) that get reported.  If they use the 1st ballot count's numbers, they are going to match, whether they do or not.

Not rocket science.  if the machines were used, the numbers would never match without monkeying with the ballots being fed into the machines.

If the cheaters are being protected by the states' leaders, they will cheat.  The kinds of cheating that happened ensures that if one method is caught and able to be undone so the real numbers are found, it doesn't undo the other methods.

Recounts only go so far.  Mail-in ballots with poor signature matching, no or late "received" dates, invalid envelopes, missing privacy envelopes, no birthdate, impossible birthdates, wrong addresses, no addresses, illegal addresses, ... all of it was supposed to be verified, and the ones not in compliance with the law were to be thrown out.  Instead, Democrat districts were allowed to "cure" these kinds of ballots, but someone "forgot" to tell Republican districts they, too, could cure their voters' ballots.  One the ballots are cured (or pretended to be cured) by Democrat precincts, those ballots go in the "good to go" stack.  The ones not cured by Republicans go in the "illegal ballot" stack.  Recount after recount, the same ballots will yield the same numbers, because none of the physical ballots change. Why would they?  They are 70-99% for Biden, even in counties that voted overwhelmingly for Trump in 2016.

This is just one example of how crooked the election was run.  If you think they can't do a hand recount and magically get the exact same numbers as before, you're smoking something that should disqualify you from owning guns.

So, yeah.  If you count all the illegal ballots 100 times, you're still going to get the same number.

What you say is true, yet problem is there really isn't much evidence that large numbers of illegal ballots were accepted.

What you say is true, yet problem is there really isn't much evidence that large numbers of illegal ballots were accepted.

We covered this already.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk