Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 608751 times)

macsak

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2120 on: May 27, 2021, 07:13:13 PM »
You were so close,  read those words before your highlight  :shaka:

Also others are people who believe in the justice system.

are you implying we don't believe in the justice system?

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2121 on: May 27, 2021, 07:34:29 PM »
There is a chain of custody. Idk what you are blabbering about.  Unless you are whining about Mail in ballots which are completely normal and have other measures to ensure validity.

You know you are lying, we know you are lying and you know we know you are lying. Your game is boring, take it somewhere else.

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2122 on: May 27, 2021, 07:47:48 PM »
You know you are lying, we know you are lying and you know we know you are lying. Your game is boring, take it somewhere else.

Man most of America clearly is made up of lies you must be the minority of truth. Oh wait that might just be your own version backed by a few that doesn't include anything authoritive like a court. 

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2123 on: May 27, 2021, 07:58:12 PM »
Man most of America clearly is made up of lies you must be the minority of truth. Oh wait that might just be your own version backed by a few that doesn't include anything authoritive like a court.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2124 on: May 27, 2021, 09:35:19 PM »
There is a chain of custody. Idk what you are blabbering about.  Unless you are whining about Mail in ballots which are completely normal and have other measures to ensure validity.

You should watch and read more than you blather on about ... everything!

The AZ Senate hearing brought out the fact that the chain of custody documentation (aka "evidence") for the ballots between the Nov election and Apr 22 have yet to be provided by the elections officials. 

Chain of custody doesn't just start with the "link" the people being audited want to say it does. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/still-dont-chain-custody-documents-az-audit-director-ken-bennett-speaks-tgps-jordan-conradson-latest-developments-americas-audit-video/

If you can't read all the words, there's a video of the testimony.  Try Google.  You can use the practice!   :geekdanc:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2125 on: May 27, 2021, 09:47:15 PM »
You should watch and read more than you blather on about ... everything!

The AZ Senate hearing brought out the fact that the chain of custody documentation (aka "evidence") for the ballots between the Nov election and Apr 22 have yet to be provided by the elections officials. 

Chain of custody doesn't just start with the "link" the people being audited want to say it does. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/still-dont-chain-custody-documents-az-audit-director-ken-bennett-speaks-tgps-jordan-conradson-latest-developments-americas-audit-video/

If you can't read all the words, there's a video of the testimony.  Try Google.  You can use the practice!   :geekdanc:

Georgia cant produce matching CoC docs, nor can WI, or PA. Considering how bad government is at its job, and how many complicated moving pieces there are in an election, and the massive amounts of paper they must generate, it would not surprise me that they screw that up every single time, but audits are rare so you'd never know unless you are a high level poll worker, election bosses arent going to blow that whistle its their F-up. A very good chance that this is an open secret and one certain folks knew they could exploit. More ballots returned than registered voters is VERY tough to explain away, especially since most states refused to clear their rolls even after being sued to do so. Only legit  way to explain all that bloat would be with CoC.

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2126 on: May 28, 2021, 06:20:39 AM »
are you implying we don't believe in the justice system?

Some of you, yes. 

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2127 on: May 28, 2021, 08:24:48 AM »
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/wisconsin-republicans-expand-investigation-2020-election-nonprofits

Wisconsin Republicans expand investigation into 2020 election nonprofits

"What I am most concerned about is making sure that when we have another election in 2022, we don't have the same problems," Vos said.

Reports point to outside, nonprofit groups like the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life using grant money to gain access to election operations in Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Racine and Kenosha.The investigation will not lead to criminal charges, since the Legislature doesn't have that power. But Vos said he hopes to show clear and convincing evidence that these outside groups broke Wisconsin's election laws, so that lawmakers can change those laws.

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2128 on: May 28, 2021, 09:38:13 AM »
You should watch and read more than you blather on about ... everything!

The AZ Senate hearing brought out the fact that the chain of custody documentation (aka "evidence") for the ballots between the Nov election and Apr 22 have yet to be provided by the elections officials. 

Chain of custody doesn't just start with the "link" the people being audited want to say it does. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/still-dont-chain-custody-documents-az-audit-director-ken-bennett-speaks-tgps-jordan-conradson-latest-developments-americas-audit-video/

If you can't read all the words, there's a video of the testimony.  Try Google.  You can use the practice!   :geekdanc:

His definition of chain of custody is probably just as long as the mailman picks up the envelope is all that's needed.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2129 on: May 28, 2021, 10:19:54 AM »
Some of you, yes.

The Justice System doesn't require that you believe in it or not.  It's a documented FACT that the justice system is susceptible to corruption, incompetence, poorly written laws, bad precedence, mistakes, bad rulings, bad juries, bad jury members, jury tampering, legal "tricks" by lawyers who win by taking advantage of the "system" setting guilty people free and sending innocent people to prison for a good part, if not the rest of, their lives.

Regardless, if the occasion arises when YOU have to be put through the system, your fate rests in the hands of clerks who often make mistakes, lawyers who only want to win, judges who interpret the laws and are often reversed on appeal, and juries who, for the most part, would rather be somewhere else.

The FBI just sent one of our top prosecutors to prison as well as her police chief husband.  The top attorney, her boss, is still being investigated and may join them along with the cops and others found to have taken part in the years of corrupt and illegal activities of these people.

Justice System?  What's not to believe in?   :wacko:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2130 on: May 28, 2021, 10:27:38 AM »
The Justice System doesn't require that you believe in it or not.  It's a documented FACT that the justice system is susceptible to corruption, incompetence, poorly written laws, bad precedence, mistakes, bad rulings, bad juries, bad jury members, jury tampering, legal "tricks" by lawyers who win by taking advantage of the "system" setting guilty people free and sending innocent people to prison for a good part, if not the rest of, their lives.

Regardless, if the occasion arises when YOU have to be put through the system, your fate rests in the hands of clerks who often make mistakes, lawyers who only want to win, judges who interpret the laws and are often reversed on appeal, and juries who, for the most part, would rather be somewhere else.

The FBI just sent one of our top prosecutors to prison as well as her police chief husband.  The top attorney, her boss, is still being investigated and may join them along with the cops and others found to have taken part in the years of corrupt and illegal activities of these people.

Justice System?  What's not to believe in?   :wacko:

Still is a fundamental part of our country and democracy.   Serves to provide more good than bad.  There isn't an institution in the entire world without issues.  Even churches you can find worse offenses.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2131 on: May 28, 2021, 10:32:59 AM »
Still is a fundamental part of our country and democracy.   Serves to provide more good than bad.  There isn't an institution in the entire world without issues.  Even churches you can find worse offenses.

Show me where I said the opposite of anything you just wrote.

Your reply is non-responsive.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2132 on: May 28, 2021, 10:49:46 AM »
GA estimates 30,000 fraudulent votes. #notmassfraud

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2133 on: May 28, 2021, 10:52:54 AM »
Georgia cant produce matching CoC docs, nor can WI, or PA. Considering how bad government is at its job, and how many complicated moving pieces there are in an election, and the massive amounts of paper they must generate, it would not surprise me that they screw that up every single time, but audits are rare so you'd never know unless you are a high level poll worker, election bosses arent going to blow that whistle its their F-up. A very good chance that this is an open secret and one certain folks knew they could exploit. More ballots returned than registered voters is VERY tough to explain away, especially since most states refused to clear their rolls even after being sued to do so. Only legit  way to explain all that bloat would be with CoC.

In COURT (that place that's the only legitimate means of determining the truth), if the police can't demonstrate that the chain of custody was documented and maintained, that evidence will be excluded, because you can't trust evidence that was not 100% controlled by the investigators from collection to presentation.

Given that is the standard, and the chain of custody for these ballots are in question, it's logical that all those ballots are no longer able to be trusted and must be excluded from the tally.

That's the only remedy that makes sense unless chain of custody can be proven through existing documentation.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2134 on: May 28, 2021, 10:55:59 AM »
I don't know who is worse, the compulsive liar or the people who keep arguing with a known liar.

What do they say about constantly repeating the same mistake expecting a different outcome?

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2135 on: May 28, 2021, 11:28:44 AM »
I don't know who is worse, the compulsive liar or the people who keep arguing with a known liar.

What do they say about constantly repeating the same mistake expecting a different outcome?

We've seen this already that the people arguing are incompetent and it's the ones at the top who really know what's going on.  The people who argue for them are the pawns.

Same way with the anti gun groups. The people at the top know why they're wanting to take guns away and it's not due to save lives.  It's so when the time comes to control the people by other powers, it's much easier when the people cannot fight back.  Then the everyday people are the pawns. you know, those who wear the red shirts and come to hearings. They all think they are doing it for a good reason.  The 2a has been stripped slowly without even firing a single shot.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2136 on: May 28, 2021, 12:57:04 PM »
I don't know who is worse, the compulsive liar or the people who keep arguing with a known liar.

What do they say about constantly repeating the same mistake expecting a different outcome?

Not sure everyone is arguing with the liar as much as calling him out so everyone can see how often he lies.

It's also the satisfaction of being able to prove he's only using Google as his sources -- no personal knowledge, understanding or experience to share.  He just wants to argue.

The hope has always been to either (1) show him the error of his ways and instill a better understanding of how the media and government as a rule can't be trusted, and (2) how involving yourself in a conversation without first educating yourself on the FACTS (not just what the media provides) creates a lot of misunderstandings, hard feelings and unproductive threads.

Just like the promises of Mr. "Hope and Change,"  those hopes have yet to materialize.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

bass monkey

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2137 on: May 28, 2021, 02:01:50 PM »
I don't know who is worse, the compulsive liar or the people who keep arguing with a known liar.

What do they say about constantly repeating the same mistake expecting a different outcome?

And we lose good men as well
Like Inspector

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2138 on: May 29, 2021, 06:40:08 AM »

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2139 on: May 29, 2021, 06:47:08 AM »
Not sure everyone is arguing with the liar as much as calling him out so everyone can see how often he lies.

It's also the satisfaction of being able to prove he's only using Google as his sources -- no personal knowledge, understanding or experience to share.  He just wants to argue.

The hope has always been to either (1) show him the error of his ways and instill a better understanding of how the media and government as a rule can't be trusted, and (2) how involving yourself in a conversation without first educating yourself on the FACTS (not just what the media provides) creates a lot of misunderstandings, hard feelings and unproductive threads.

Just like the promises of Mr. "Hope and Change,"  those hopes have yet to materialize.

Sorry buddy but you are part of the problem, interacting at all with that POS just encourages xhim to keep going. I am guilty of it as well. But I am gonna quit, it would be nice if you would as well. There is only a fire if we give it oxygen. Xhe only makes this place dumber and even entertaining dialog with that level of moron gives the 2A community a bad look.