Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 530550 times)

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2200 on: June 10, 2021, 10:59:20 AM »
All of Zuckerbergs money went specifically toward maxing Dem turn out. That money wasn't just handed out to be used as the state saw fit, it had VERY specific terms and conditions as to how it could be used / spent. He literally bought election results.

Yep.  I imagine that was the icing on the "donation" cake, too.  He and other billionaires were throwing money at specific causes to increase Dem turnout, not the least of which was Bloomberg offering to pay off felons' reparations and debts to clear them to vote.  But, he only made that offer in Dem counties in Florida.  FL Gov DeSantis said he was going to investigate whether that crosses the line of buying votes according to FL law.  Haven't seen anything new.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2201 on: June 10, 2021, 11:44:37 AM »
So according to our resident  not a lawyer, but has lawyer friends, no law was broken at that specific time.  So it's all G.

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2202 on: June 10, 2021, 12:02:20 PM »
So according to our resident  not a lawyer, but has lawyer friends, no law was broken at that specific time.  So it's all G.
I thought he said his Mom was a lawyer?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2203 on: June 10, 2021, 12:14:18 PM »
I thought he said his Mom was a lawyer?

Hard to keep everything he says straight.

If he was raised by a lawyer, it makes perfect sense.  He's unable to form an opinion based on personal insight and experience.  Rather, he Googles what others say, then picks the opinion that has a "consensus."  Lawyers have the ability/training to argue either side of an issue and win.  They have no interest in the truth, just winning.

It also explains his belief that "nothing is true that hasn't been decided in a court or law."
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2204 on: June 10, 2021, 04:14:42 PM »
About time, this should have been the law of the land since day 1.


JUST IN : Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed a bill into law that makes intentionally altering ballots or election reports a second-degree felony, which is punishable by up to 20 years in jail.



https://m.theepochtimes.com/texas-governor-signs-bill-to-make-electoral-fraud-second-degree-felony_3849437.html/amp?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=digitalsub&__twitter_impression=true

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2205 on: June 10, 2021, 07:12:29 PM »
Hard to keep everything he says straight.

If he was raised by a lawyer, it makes perfect sense.  He's unable to form an opinion based on personal insight and experience.  Rather, he Googles what others say, then picks the opinion that has a "consensus."  Lawyers have the ability/training to argue either side of an issue and win.  They have no interest in the truth, just winning.

It also explains his belief that "nothing is true that hasn't been decided in a court or law."

What's wrong being raised in a family of lawyers?  The law seeks the truth bound by the rights of the people of this great nation. It's the bedrock of society.   

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2206 on: June 10, 2021, 07:16:42 PM »
So according to our resident  not a lawyer, but has lawyer friends, no law was broken at that specific time.  So it's all G.

Are you saying you should prevent legal activities?

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2207 on: June 10, 2021, 07:20:19 PM »
Deeds Not Words

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2208 on: June 10, 2021, 07:36:22 PM »
What's wrong being raised in a family of lawyers?  The law seeks the truth bound by the rights of the people of this great nation. It's the bedrock of society.

That's a general question.

We're talking about you and your family specifically.

Focus.

The majority of laws seek to control the masses and regulate behavior.  That has nothing to do with the truth, and everything to do with power.

Your definition is theoretical at best and does not describe reality.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2209 on: June 10, 2021, 07:53:11 PM »
Are you saying you should prevent legal activities?
What do u think i was saying?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2210 on: June 11, 2021, 06:21:28 AM »
What do u think i was saying?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Exactly that.   In a sarcastic tone.

 If it's not illegal it's all g.

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2211 on: June 11, 2021, 07:27:46 AM »
Hard to keep everything he says straight.

If he was raised by a lawyer, it makes perfect sense.  He's unable to form an opinion based on personal insight and experience.  Rather, he Googles what others say, then picks the opinion that has a "consensus."  Lawyers have the ability/training to argue either side of an issue and win.  They have no interest in the truth, just winning.

It also explains his belief that "nothing is true that hasn't been decided in a court or law."
Hit the nail on the head!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2212 on: June 11, 2021, 08:20:06 AM »
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/breaking-exclusive-huge-printers-ballots-better-lawyer-2020-ballots-modified-multiple-republican-areas-forcing-adjudication-potential-fraudulent-vote-switching/

Ballot Printing Companies Better Lawyer Up – 2020 Ballots Were Modified in Multiple Republican Areas Forcing Adjudication and Potential Fraudulent Vote Switching


changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2213 on: June 11, 2021, 08:20:44 AM »
Exactly that.   In a sarcastic tone.

 If it's not illegal it's all g.
Someone fell asleep during ethics despite a 3.7gpa.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2214 on: June 11, 2021, 08:29:00 AM »
Someone fell asleep during ethics despite a 3.7gpa.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
If it's not illegal, or doesn't impact him, it's all g

Mah bad. . .

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2215 on: June 11, 2021, 09:01:51 AM »
If it's not illegal, or doesn't impact him, it's all g

Mah bad. . .

Omni's Ethics Course.  BRB buying an EV just to prove I'm more green than he is.

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2216 on: June 11, 2021, 09:11:44 AM »
Omni's Ethics Course.  BRB buying an EV just to prove I'm more green than he is.
Standard of personal ethics. . . what would I do or does it offend me. . .

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2217 on: June 11, 2021, 09:49:57 AM »
This is a solution that should have been done four decades ago, this really wrecks the Dems BS excuses to why you cant secure elections.

NC Republicans Push Legislation to Fund Mobile Voter ID Machine for Those Legal Voters without Proper ID

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/finally-solution-voter-laws-nc-republicans-push-legislation-fund-mobile-voter-machine-legal-voters-without-proper/

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2218 on: June 11, 2021, 10:29:05 AM »
This is a solution that should have been done four decades ago, this really wrecks the Dems BS excuses to why you cant secure elections.

NC Republicans Push Legislation to Fund Mobile Voter ID Machine for Those Legal Voters without Proper ID

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/finally-solution-voter-laws-nc-republicans-push-legislation-fund-mobile-voter-machine-legal-voters-without-proper/

Trump didn't push hard for all these things even though he knew what would happen.  He had to show the people what would happen, which would cause the need for more secure election laws/rules.

Had he not shown the people, then the fake news would continue their barrage on him calling him a dictator.

Only the simple minded or TDS sufferers still do not see the problems that we have after what was shown to happen.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2219 on: June 11, 2021, 11:29:10 AM »
Trump didn't push hard for all these things even though he knew what would happen.  He had to show the people what would happen, which would cause the need for more secure election laws/rules.

Had he not shown the people, then the fake news would continue their barrage on him calling him a dictator.

Only the simple minded or TDS sufferers still do not see the problems that we have after what was shown to happen.

The federal government can't really push for ANYTHING election-related.  The states have the duty and authority to run their elections however they wish.  If they want to use a phone app, they can.  The only way the feds can intervene is if a voter/voters sue over having their individual voting rights violated.

We found this out in 2000.  In the final analysis, after all the selectively targeted recounts, hanging chads, butterfly ballots and blocked observers, the Supreme Court finally said, "Let the original certified count stand."  What the STATE certified was what the feds had to accept.  That's pretty much how 2020 went.  The Supreme Court refused to intervene because the Constitution takes the responsibility to run elections away from Washington, DC, and gives it to each of the states.

It would be nice if the feds used their power of the purse to standardize the voting processes, equipment and rules, but they have chosen not to.

Anyway, what Trump did or did not do was more in keeping with his role as a candidate, and less in his role as President.  His campaign sued over some swing states' unconstitutional changing of the rules outside of their state legislature, and so on. 

Anyway, the states are the culprits.  We'd like for the feds to fix the problems that the states don't seem to want to even acknowledge, but in this case, it's outside of the fed's jurisdiction.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw