Government Prepares For Next Pandemic By Taking Away Everyone's Rights Ahead Of Time

December 1st, 2020

https://babylonbee.com/news/government-to-prepare-for-next-pandemic-by-stripping-rights-now



U.S.—With effective vaccines on the horizon, people are getting ready to finally see an end to the COVID-19 pandemic. Officials are now thinking of how to best prepare for the next global pandemic, with most settling on just going ahead and stripping people of their rights now.

“If there is one thing that stops an effective response to a pandemic, it’s liberty,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom. “People thinking they’re free to do whatever they want will just lead to more deaths. So even when everyone is vaccinated, I’m still going to give everyone arbitrary rules for when they can leave their homes, what they’re allowed to do, and what they have to wear so they’re already used to obeying the government when the next crisis hits.”

The upcoming Biden administration agrees and says they will form a new committee to decide which rights people are allowed to exercise each day based on science and especially arbitrary whims. This will replace the current custom of people having all their rights all the time and able to use them willy-nilly, which is an impediment whenever the government decides to assert control.

Some politicians fear that the Supreme Court could intervene, as a number of the justices have the archaic idea that the Constitution limits the government’s power, even when politicians are “really, really sure” that what they’re doing is good. Many are suggesting then that the Democrats will also need to pack the Supreme Court to prepare for the next pandemic.

“People want to do whatever they can to stop the next crisis,” Biden told the press, “but that’s the wrong attitude. What you need to do is whatever we tell you.”

Enjoy!

Enjoy!

There is speculation that should China Bidet and Whore@ss take office that not only will the 230 exemptions for social media not be amended to deprive them of liability for censorship, but that it will be strengthened so they can censor even more without penalty, and that pressure will be put on various agencies and regulators to ban, or at least make life very difficult, for the alternatives like Parler and Gab and whoever else might want to attempt to provide uncensored avenues for former facebook and twitter, etc. users. This scenario is already a reality in many European countries where the police bust in doors and arrest people for "hate speech", "disinformation", etc.[I.e. information/ideas contrary to the official government propaganda.]  While we have the First Amendment, it obviously doesn't apply to private entities who have paid off government officials (Or to government officials who want to ban or severely limit religious services because "THE VIRUS!!!".).

I guess I'm not the only one re 230 exemptions... some guy posted this late this afternoon...

CDC expected tomorrow (Wednesday 12/3/20) to announce new "quarantine" guidelines, reportedly approved by the White House Corona Virus Task Force (Scott Atlas resigned two days ago).

The new quarantine rule will be 10 days (after exposure to an infected person), or 7 days if one has a negative test. The "science" shows that an exposed person will develop symptoms, if they have acquired sufficient viral load to manifest illness and contagiousness, within 4-5 days.

Any bets on when the morons running the state of Hawaii authoritarian SARS-CoV-2 nonsense will "follow the science" and adopt the new CDC guidelines? My guess: never. Okay, maybe September 2021.

Any bets on what the exact language will be justifying their refusal to "follow the science"? My bet: ignoramic mumbling randomly using the words "safe" and "safety", and, if there's a lawyer there, "an abundance of caution".

CDC expected tomorrow (Wednesday 12/3/20) to announce new "quarantine" guidelines, reportedly approved by the White House Corona Virus Task Force (Scott Atlas resigned two days ago).

The new quarantine rule will be 10 days (after exposure to an infected person), or 7 days if one has a negative test. The "science" shows that an exposed person will develop symptoms, if they have acquired sufficient viral load to manifest illness and contagiousness, within 4-5 days.

Any bets on when the morons running the state of Hawaii authoritarian SARS-CoV-2 nonsense will "follow the science" and adopt the new CDC guidelines? My guess: never. Okay, maybe September 2021.

Any bets on what the exact language will be justifying their refusal to "follow the science"? My bet: ignoramic mumbling randomly using the words "safe" and "safety", and, if there's a lawyer there, "an abundance of caution".

They will double those days recommended by CDC "out of an abundance of caution".
What we have is an easily controlled population, scared into submission. I hear from people that cloth masks will keep out the virus. That's why you see people all by themselves in a car with a mask. I saw a woman wipe her groceries down with Clorox wipes after shopping at Costco and loading her stuff into her car. People wearing latex gloves where ever they go and shop respirators at the range....yep cosplay operators gotta keep the Covid at bay...cuz they operate...

They will double those days recommended by CDC "out of an abundance of caution".
What we have is an easily controlled population, scared into submission. I hear from people that cloth masks will keep out the virus. That's why you see people all by themselves in a car with a mask. I saw a woman wipe her groceries down with Clorox wipes after shopping at Costco and loading her stuff into her car. People wearing latex gloves where ever they go and shop respirators at the range....yep cosplay operators gotta keep the Covid at bay...cuz they operate...

Oh the utter horror, people being careful with a deadly virus spreading around.       You know there is no harm in being careful right?  Those people have every right to act the way they do.  If we all were extra careful we would be like other countries that successfully fought off the virus.

Oh the utter horror, people being careful with a deadly virus spreading around.       You know there is no harm in being careful right?  Those people have every right to act the way they do.  If we all were extra careful we would be like other countries that successfully fought off the virus.

Since when is hiding considered "fighting?"

I have a question here for almost everyone.

Since it has been proven by the science that once you have had the COVID-19 virus your chances of reinfection are practically nil. Why should anyone who has had the virus still have to wear a mask? They can’t infect anyone and they can’t get it again. So shouldn’t they be exempt from wearing a mask?

And once the vaccine has been distributed and those who want it, get it. Why should they be mandated to wear masks? They have been vaccinated against getting it so their chances of not getting it are approximately 95% or better. Shouldn’t they also be exempt from wearing masks as well?

How can our government justify mask wearing for those people I referenced above?

Oh the utter horror, people being careful with a deadly virus spreading around.       You know there is no harm in being careful right?  Those people have every right to act the way they do.  If we all were extra careful we would be like other countries that successfully fought off the virus.

as do the people who don't want to get vaccinated, yet you think they should not be able to go to school or go to work...

as do the people who don't want to get vaccinated, yet you think they should not be able to go to school or go to work...

OG’s sense of freedom... If it’s against his beliefs, no matter how irrational, he has a crusade against. He’s a hero for his own causes.

I have a question here for almost everyone.

Since it has been proven by the science that once you have had the COVID-19 virus your chances of reinfection are practically nil. Why should anyone who has had the virus still have to wear a mask? They can’t infect anyone and they can’t get it again. So shouldn’t they be exempt from wearing a mask?

And once the vaccine has been distributed and those who want it, get it. Why should they be mandated to wear masks? They have been vaccinated against getting it so their chances of not getting it are approximately 95% or better. Shouldn’t they also be exempt from wearing masks as well?

How can our government justify mask wearing for those people I referenced above?

Are you seriously suggesting that the government will, in the future after the vaccine is widespread, or in the present with people previously having been diagnosed with the virus, have a rational, logical policy based on actual sound peer-reviewed science? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That ain't gonna happen... or it would have already happened, and what we have is the exact opposite. People now get off a plane in Kona bearing a negative RT_PCR test from within the pasts 72 hours. They are asymptomatic. They then are given an antigen test on site. If that is also negative, they may go on their way WEARING A MASK.

Once you adopt a pseudoscientific "play it SAFE" policy basis, facts don't matter. Some extremely minute percentage of people have contracted SAR-CoV-2 a second time. Under the current (and future) "SAFE AT ALL COSTS" policy, obviously if just one person somewhere sometime could be re-infected to the point of being infectious, you ALL must wear masks and social distance and limit gathering size and shut down non-essential businesses, etc., etc., etc.

Plus, a previously infected person, though perhaps not able to develop the disease itself, could, theoretically, be exposed to "THE VIRUS!!!" and "carry" a sufficient live viral load capable of infecting other people. SAFE AT ALL COSTS demands everyone wear a mask, always. Ask Fauci. He agrees. Scott Atlas is now gone from the Task Force and so apparently only the fascist authoritarian disregarders of the actual data will be running things there and at the CDC... and the local people are way more stupid than them.

Besides, who cares about science when the statist fascist authoritarians have an opportunity to exercise their power over the little people and laugh gleefully as they watch "the public" conform to absurd diktats while ruining their financial and emotional lives?

I have a question here for almost everyone.

Since it has been proven by the science that once you have had the COVID-19 virus your chances of reinfection are practically nil. Why should anyone who has had the virus still have to wear a mask? They can’t infect anyone and they can’t get it again. So shouldn’t they be exempt from wearing a mask?

And once the vaccine has been distributed and those who want it, get it. Why should they be mandated to wear masks? They have been vaccinated against getting it so their chances of not getting it are approximately 95% or better. Shouldn’t they also be exempt from wearing masks as well?

How can our government justify mask wearing for those people I referenced above?

How will the police identify people who qualify and those who don't? 

as do the people who don't want to get vaccinated, yet you think they should not be able to go to school or go to work...

You have the right to do things,  not the right to not face consequences of your actions.  You have the right to be a nudist, but then that disallows you to be in public.

You have the right to do things,  not the right to not face consequences of your actions.  You have the right to be a nudist, but then that disallows you to be in public.

still no comment on that video?

still no comment on that video?

Still no acceptance of bets made? 

Jake Paul is rumored to be trying to box Conor McGregor. . . 

You have the right to do things,  not the right to not face consequences of your actions.  You have the right to be a nudist, but then that disallows you to be in public.

Is nudism in the constitution?

How will the police identify people who qualify and those who don't?

Remember we discussed the armband thing a few weeks ago?

How will the police identify people who qualify and those who don't?

"Papers, please."

Is nudism in the constitution?

Freedom baby! 

Cause he's Freeeeee!  Freee balllllin!

No OG, we don't want pics. . .