'I'm Omni and I'm here to Help.'

'I'm Omni and I'm here to Help.'

Somewhere, an evil teen is in the fetal position laughing his ass off over his creation:

OmniBot.

It just argues and argues and argues.  No matter what anyone posts, he'll have a canned response ready -- whether it makes any sense or not.

The poor grammar, vocabulary and spelling are meant to add a little authenticity, so it doesn't look like a non-person is doing the writing.

OmniBot -- tailored for the political bias of your choice.

I ain't no snitch.

Double negative -- so you ARE a snitch.

Hahahahhahaha.  And he assumed I was talking about him. No one else replied in a manner like that.  He outed himself and called himself a snitch.

Notice how he stated neutral.  So it was known that Jews were being wronged. He admitted that he would not do anything and go with the flow.  No protest, writing letters to law makers/politicians on how it's wrong, letters to scientist on how they're wrong that Jews do not spread disease or are the cause for the nations problems, etc...This explains a lot. Stay neutral for the continuation of the nation.

Wow trying to sound funny clearly went over yalls heads. 

I am not an informant.  I don't make it my practice to throw others under the bus.  But at the same time I am not some savior.  If I am not involved I try not to get involved.

So yes oil.  I would, as you desperately want to prove...probably "follow orders" if made to choose.   I would object as the science is wrong.  But I wouldn't go guerilla warfare or civil war. 

I ain't no snitch.

Double negative -- so you ARE a snitch.

"ain't" is poor vocabulary.  I remember when those of us in the South were called ignorant hillbillies and rednecks for using "ain't'.  In fact, the word was not considered a word at all, but a regional colloquialism at best.

"germen" is absolutely not a word.

The only thing neutral about you is your gender.  Your political biases and hatred of the Republican Party is all over your posts. 

Stop the charade.

My gender is not neutral.  I am a male.  The joke went over your head.  No humor....something something about intelligence. I "dislike" democrats and republicans but I don't join the democrat bashing here.  My fight if for the middle.  Giving balance to the echo chamber.  I have on many times agreed with the republicans and disagreed with the democrats.  But those are not talking points that you like to point out.

He claims to be for both sides, but never posted an article of a vaxxed person dying or being messed up.  Guess in his mind, he feels he is being equal.

Yall do plenty of posting for the anti vaxx side.  No need to post more on that.  Not sure if you understand equality.

Also its not 100% for equality I am not here for the sake of arguing.  I post my opinions.  Regardless of what anyone else thinks.

There are many times we agree, but you don't hate on that. 

Yall do plenty of posting for the anti vaxx side.  No need to post more on that.  Not sure if you understand equality.

Not posting more anti-vaxx info is one thing.

But you have yet to AGREE with any of those posts.

Not a balanced viewpoint by any stretch of the imagination.

Not posting more anti-vaxx info is one thing.

But you have yet to AGREE with any of those posts.

Not a balanced viewpoint by any stretch of the imagination.

AGREE? With what?  That the anti vaxxers are dying?

That's why I stated, he's either incompetent or here to argue.  Maybe that works on other forums, but here we recognize what he's trying to do.  And unsuccessfully by the way.  I wouldn't be surprised if he copies and paste post from here to other forums he visits. Because I have noticed that some replies are not the way he normally articulates his answers.  As in he asked for help and someone there gave him a response to use.  But said response was still wrong. So refer to by previous post about us showing both him and his help were wrong.  Double whammy.

Lol that's some tinfoil.  You think you are all special enough for that much effort by some secret organization or malicious person?   I am here to post my opinion.  When those opinions differ from yours, it turns into an argument.  When its in agreement its mostly ignored.  I am human, I do make mistakes rarely.  If any wording appears different it might be I am either putting extra effort or less effort into a post.  I've met a few of your in real life so clearly I am not a robot.  Or maybe dem secret goobermens teamed up with musk and bill gates to make a humanoid cyborg to mess with maybe .0000000001% of the population who are members of a forum in the middle of the ocean...

Wow, that's a lot of natural immunity and probably a sh*t ton of unnecessary (immoral/ illegal) medical procedures by mass vaxxing.  They should have been doing antibodies testing....

Roughly one-third of U.S. population had COVID-19 by the end of 2020, new study



Roughly one-third of the U.S. population had been infected by the coronavirus by the end of 2020, according to a new study that appears to show how widespread but underreported the virus was.


The study was conducted by Columbia University researchers and published Thursday in the science journal Nature.


_‐----------------------


Dr. Drew from the beginning said 100% the virus was already everywhere and WAY more people were exposed than would have ever guessed 'because that's how viral infections work'. CDC really f'ed this all up.


https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/roughly-one-third-us-population-had-covid-19-end-2020-new-study

this really changes the statistics conversation doesn't it?

this really changes the statistics conversation doesn't it?

Not really.
Quote from same article

“ "Many of the epidemiological features responsible for observed rates of morbidity and mortality have been reported; however, the overall burden and characteristics of COVID-19 in the United States have not been comprehensively quantified," the researchers said.”

Nothing has been comprehensively quantified.
it’s a guess like most of this fiasco.
They can’t comprehensively quantify almost any of it.
I bet somebody’s got some numbers though.

“The number of active COVID-19 cases in the United States is roughly ten times higher than the number of confirmed cases on any given day, according to a computer model by Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health scientists. Since the start of the pandemic, an estimated one-third of the U.S. population has already been infected, with numbers five times that of the official count.

Jeffrey Shaman, PhD, a professor of environmental health sciences known for his COVID-19 projections, led the research, based on case numbers and anonymized cellphone location data to estimate population mixing. The findings appear ahead of peer review in a report by NPR.”

https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/active-covid-cases-may-be-ten-times-official-count-study



And does the shot hurt people who already had COVID ?

And does the shot hurt people who already had COVID ?

Anecdotally? Yes, the reaction is pretty bad to the vaccine if you already had COVID according to folks I know that had both. One person told me it floored them WAY worse than the actual infection did.

YMMV.

Question is are the severe heart reactions folks in their 20s are having from the vaccine related to having been previously asymptomaticaly infected.

That is the problem of not doing antibody tests.

Not really.
Quote from same article

“ "Many of the epidemiological features responsible for observed rates of morbidity and mortality have been reported; however, the overall burden and characteristics of COVID-19 in the United States have not been comprehensively quantified," the researchers said.”

Nothing has been comprehensively quantified.
it’s a guess like most of this fiasco.
They can’t comprehensively quantify almost any of it.
I bet somebody’s got some numbers though.

And does the shot hurt people who already had COVID ?

Studies so far have said no.  The vaccine does not negatively affect those who had covid previously. And its still recommended they get vaxxed.

It's not a study dumass, its computer modeling of infection spreads. Modeling was what they used to scream 'Everybody Everywhere Lock Everything Down'. This modeling is saying WAY more people had it than knew it and the lock downs were too late.

1st model and 2nd model aren't much different as to how fast they predicted host to host transfer, they are reading the new numbers as the effect of the disease on most folks was unnoticeable.

We already know lockdowns exposed way more people to the disease than they would have of they weren't forced to stay home with infected family.

Just ask all those nursing homes.

Innocent victims are dying now because of the idiots.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-us-hospital-icu-bed-shortage-veteran-dies-treatable-illness/