i fail to see how a thread where 3 or 4 people are commenting constitutes "everyone"...
And OmniGrub fails to see how the FOUNDING FATHERS were very anti-government.
The entire purpose of the Constitution is to LIMIT GOVERNMENT and PROTECT INDIVIDUALS -- specifically the Bill of Rights.
Being against your government becoming a tyrannical, fascist and oppressive Swamp might sound "anti-government" to the naive, but to me it sounds pro-liberty.
As for police, I know many people who have firsthand experience being screwed by Cops. They use their power to corrupt the system against the ordinary citizens, and without direct evidence to support a complaint the Cops normally prevail. Judges and Police Chiefs hold the presumption that Cops have no motivation to lie about a case they bring. The Cop who stops a car they say is speeding has no axe to grind with that specific driver, so the benefit of the doubt is always with the Cop. The driver has a motive to lie -- getting out of the ticket & fine.
Name another profession that requires body cameras while on duty. Could it be because Cops can't be trusted to tell the truth about an arrest that they caused to escalate, or in which they used excessive force? Obviously, we have enough doubt in their integrity that video is needed to get to the truth. Nobody else I know of is under that kind of scrutiny.
I don't include all Cops, but as the saying goes: Power corrupts. And Cops have the power of the state and the legal systems behind them. Lots of people challenge police officer's authority today. That can really piss-off the officers who believe citizens should simply comply without question in all cases.
It's not about anti-Cop or anti-government. It's about anti-absolute-power. No government or government agency should have that -- ever.