Trie to take credit for bin laden raid

Biden was more concerned with losing the White House (i.e. politics) than he was national security and taking out the #1 terrorist in the world.

"He got to me. He said, 'Joe, what do you think?' And I said, 'You know, I didn't know we had
so many economists around the table.' I said, 'We owe the man a direct answer. Mr. President,
my suggestion is, don't go. We have to do two more things to see if he's there,'" Biden recalled.

While the vice president did not explain what those two more things were, the next morning the
president gave National Security Adviser Tom Donilon the "go" to launch the SEAL raid of the compound.

"He knew what was at stake, not just the lives of those brave warriors, but literally the presidency," Biden said.

https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/joe-biden-advised-against-the-osama-bin-laden-raid

forgets his own HHS secretary's name

No one remembers Bush, the mortgage crisis, too big to fail and the massive bank bailouts? Really?

Biden’s move to fire the top U.S. mortgage regulator is triggering calls from fellow Democrats to use the agency to expand access to loans for lower-income people, who have struggled to buy homes since the financial crisis


https://mobile.twitter.com/politico/status/1412139403280105473

Good catch Glasser. Many of us remember the Clintons and their cronies coerced the banks into giving zero down mortgages to low income people with bad credit. Many were welfare recipients. To make matter worse these toxic mortgages were bundled together with A paper loans
and sold to the banks, and pension funds as good investments. The Biden lunatics are running the asylum. Here we go again?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9780711/Biden-backs-Cubas-clarion-call-freedom.html

Biden backs Cuba's 'clarion call for freedom' from 'the grip of the pandemic and decades of repression': President urges communist regime to 'hear' the protesters rather than 'enrich themselves'

Potentially thousands more to add to his voter base. . .

But socialism/communism is good.

But socialism/communism is good.

Bug eating commie!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Potentially thousands more to add to his voter base. . .

Nope, Cuban refugees vote Republican in a big way, no one hates Socialism / Communism more than the people who lived it, not just read about it in college.

Nope, Cuban refugees vote Republican in a big way, no one hates Socialism / Communism more than the people who lived it, not just read about it in college.

I was mostly being sarcastic, as in Biden et al just doing that on surface.  Playing to whatever is the issue of the day, with no intent of following through.  If they aware of Biden and his agenda, and hate him, then bring em on over.   

I was mostly being sarcastic, as in Biden et al just doing that on surface.  Playing to whatever is the issue of the day, with no intent of following through.  If they aware of Biden and his agenda, and hate him, then bring em on over.   

Sarcasm, to be or not to be...

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Sarcasm, to be or not to be...

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

No mind. . .

No mind. . .

Mind bender...

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

there's no enthusiasm for an aged man like Joe Biden. Trump was a President but he still garners a lot more support than old Joe.

Biden today trying to talk them out of another forensic election audit.

President Biden: "In America, if you lose, you accept the results. You follow the Constitution. You try again. You don't call facts fake and then try to bring down the American experiment just because you're unhappy. That's not statesmanship. That's selfishness."


https://mobile.twitter.com/cspan/status/1415025099347009538


What about this Joe?

Also

Trump arrives at UFC 264.  fans cheer the People's Champ!    

Also

There's no evidence that a single vote in 2016 was altered by hackers nor changed by the voter as a result of anything the "Russians" did.

Yet, Russia somehow "interfered" in the election.  I think at some point, the honest press needs to start using the phrase "attempted to interfere," or "attempted interference" which would be much more accurate.  "Interfered/Interfering" gives the perception they succeeded.

"honest press" <== oxymoron

There's no evidence that a single vote in 2016 was altered by hackers nor changed by the voter as a result of anything the "Russians" did.

Yet, Russia somehow "interfered" in the election.  I think at some point, the honest press needs to start using the phrase "attempted to interfere," or "attempted interference" which would be much more accurate.  "Interfered/Interfering" gives the perception they succeeded.

"honest press" <== oxymoron

There's no evidence that they altered votes but there is proven evidence they tried to sway public opinion by "campaigning". They posted fake political news and tried to alter public opinion. 

There's no evidence that they altered votes but there is evidence they tried to sway public opinion by "campaigning". They posted fake political news and tried to alter public opinion.

So “evidence” is enough for you in that case?

:facepalm:

You really don’t get it…