NEW UPDATE!   


I just talked to my daughter, and she informed me that her mother had psoriasis appear in 2014, but very mild.  We were divorced in 2005, so that's why we never knew.

She also informed me her mother-in-law has had it for about 8 years.  Doing the math, 2014 was about 8 years ago.  Strange coincidence?  Her case has also been very mild.  Both said they only experienced minor, short-term rashes a few times a year, mostly above the shoulders.

What is also coincidental is BOTH WOMEN have had the COVID vaccine, and both are now experiencing moderate to severe rashes on their legs, arms and torsos in addition to face and neck.

Things that make you go, "Hmmmmm!"

Just had a nurse friend tell me that her menstrual cycle is all messed up and she's pretty sure that she can't have kids any more. The facility she is at is way understaffed with many workers regularly calling in sick, and she's thinking about leaving for another place with a bigger sign up bonus.

The demand for nurses is unreal right now.

Sorry, but it is behind a pay wall.

Hospital Accused of Using Plastic Bags Over Patients to Stop COVID Spread

https://www.theepochtimes.com/hospital-accused-of-using-plastic-bags-over-patients-to-stop-covid-spread_4086852.html

Hospital Accused of Using Plastic Bags Over Patients to Stop COVID Spread

I find that a plastic bag properly applied and secured at the neck stops any disease from spreading.

Dead men don't sneeze.  If they do, the bag will catch it!

 

Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73%
Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-percent. Today we can reveal that the latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency, which has recently replaced Public Health England, shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-three-percent, despite being weeks into a booster jab campaign.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
(cont...)
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/05/covid-19-have-average-effectiveness-of-minus-seventy-three-percent/

Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73%
Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-percent. Today we can reveal that the latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency, which has recently replaced Public Health England, shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-three-percent, despite being weeks into a booster jab campaign.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
(cont...)
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/05/covid-19-have-average-effectiveness-of-minus-seventy-three-percent/

#Fakenews

MassConfusion
That is mass confusing.
 

yup, the difference between relative risk and absolute risk is something that the people i follow have been talking about for a long time...

Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73%
Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-percent. Today we can reveal that the latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency, which has recently replaced Public Health England, shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-three-percent, despite being weeks into a booster jab campaign.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
(cont...)
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/05/covid-19-have-average-effectiveness-of-minus-seventy-three-percent/

Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73%
Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-percent. Today we can reveal that the latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency, which has recently replaced Public Health England, shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-three-percent, despite being weeks into a booster jab campaign.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
(cont...)
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/05/covid-19-have-average-effectiveness-of-minus-seventy-three-percent/

yep

yep

maths are hard for some people...

If they don't take it themselves, then why should we?

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/cdc-director-refuses-tell-senators-how-many-cdc-employees-are-fully-vaxxd

maths are hard for some people...

number salad. bruh

maths are hard for some people...

Good thing some only need to count up to 32, and possible less if wisdoms have been removed. 

maths are hard for some people...

not for me

your people are good with the abacus
and math in general...

not for me

focus
google "supernumerary teeth"

Good thing some only need to count up to 32, and possible less if wisdoms have been removed. 

focus
google "supernumerary teeth"

Not a not a real doctor.

My bff was a teacher, had 1 kid use an abacus instead of calculator. He was the smartest in the class for math.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Not a not a real doctor.

My bff was a teacher, had 1 kid use an abacus instead of calculator. He was the smartest in the class for math.

Even the smartest kids have to be vaccinated to participate in sports.

Or, is that an oxymoron?   

your people are good with the abacus
and math in general...

my "people"
You waycist!