Yes, if it’s not too much trouble. Thank you.
1) If not many apply, then lawmakers will use lack of demand to push even more laws. "no one really wants it" or "this new law would only affect a small percent". Which we are seeing now as there are only 1000 applicants of which, some are duplicates due to multiple guns. Over the years, I've heard many complain about CCW and some haven't even bothered because "it's too humbug" or "no can carry anywhere with sensitive places anyways" or "it's only for 1 year and too humbug".
2) When a lawsuit is filed or needs plaintiffs, being a current CCW holder would be required. Or if an injunction is issued, it would apply to CCW holders/plantiffs only.
3) By having a CCW, you're sticking it to HI's anti 2a lawmakers and the chiefs who've denied CCW for decades. It's the principal of the matter
4) Bragging rights
5) What if you needed it and didn't apply/have it. The thought would be in the back of your head, "damn, I wish I had my CCW". Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it saying comes to mind.
6) FREEDOM, well some freedom anyways due to sensitive places.