SCOTUS rules on TX boarder (Read 7850 times)

ren

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #40 on: March 19, 2024, 09:26:17 AM »
A Karen confronts the Texas National Guard.
She states that she is a local demorat official. That statement explains a lot.




she should offer up her home to house these illegals
Deeds Not Words

Flapp_Jackson

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #41 on: March 19, 2024, 09:37:41 AM »
SCOTUS ruled TX can arrest people. 7 to 9 ruling.


When did the US Supreme Court expand to 16 Justices?
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

macsak

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #42 on: March 19, 2024, 09:50:54 AM »
bidenomics...

When did the US Supreme Court expand to 16 Justices?

ren

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #43 on: March 19, 2024, 10:48:07 AM »
bidenomics...
Nope,
Asian trying to do math without abacus
Deeds Not Words

changemyoil66

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #44 on: March 19, 2024, 11:07:09 AM »
When did the US Supreme Court expand to 16 Justices?

No focus. 7of 9

Flapp_Jackson

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #45 on: March 19, 2024, 04:29:58 PM »
No focus. 7of 9

The articles I saw said the 3 Liberal Justices all dissented.

That would be 6 out of 9, or 6 to 3.

Quote
The U.S. Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision on Tuesday ruled that a law allowing
Texas police to arrest people suspected of illegally crossing the Texas-Mexico
border can take effect while a legal battle over the new state law empowering
local law enforcement plays out.
https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03/19/texas-illegal-immigration-supreme-court-sb-4/

 :geekdanc: :shaka:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

mrgaf

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #46 on: March 19, 2024, 05:03:52 PM »
My question is how many of us would be willing to take up arms? It’s one thing to talk, another to do…. :-\
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.  Thomas Paine.

No man can get rich in politics unless he is a crook.  It cannot be done. Harry Truman

Only good liberal is one taking a dirt nap.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #47 on: March 20, 2024, 12:25:16 AM »
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

rpoL98

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #48 on: March 20, 2024, 11:32:23 AM »
7 of 9?


them's some Dagmars.

on topic, my head spins when i try to figure out have an appeals court overrules SCOTUS.  so confusing: stays, injunctions, back and forth.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #49 on: November 28, 2024, 03:19:58 PM »
Finally, an actual ruling on the Texas razor wire fences they placed along their border.

Court backs Texas over
razor wire installed on
US-Mexico border

Quote
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A federal appeals court Wednesday ruled that
Border Patrol agents cannot cut razor wire that Texas installed on the U.S.-
Mexico border in the town of Eagle Pass, which has become the center
of the state’s aggressive measures to curb migrant crossings.

The decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is a victory for Texas
in a long-running rift over immigration policy with the Biden administration,
which has also sought to remove floating barriers installed on the Rio Grande.

Texas has continued to install razor wire along its roughly 1,200-mile
(1,900 kilometers) border with Mexico over the past year. In a 2-1 ruling,
the court issued an injunction blocking Border Patrol agents from damaging
the wire in Eagle Pass.

“We continue adding more razor wire border barrier,” Republican
Gov. Greg Abbott posted on the social platform X in response to the ruling.

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately
respond to an email seeking comment Wednesday.

Some migrants have been injured by the sharp wire, and the Justice Department
has argued the barrier impedes the U.S. government’s ability to patrol the border,
including coming to the aid of migrants in need of help. Texas contended in the
lawsuit originally filed last year that federal government was “undermining” the
state’s border security efforts by cutting the razor wire.
https://apnews.com/article/texas-immigration-border-razor-wire-d6ac24f9d7eb62b9c14cc0fb4498b27e

Interestingly, the DOJ isn't pushing the legal argument that securing the border is the Federal Government's role, which through deductive reasoning means the individual states do not have a right to secure their state borders -- even if the Feds fail to provide protection.

Instead, they are arguing the Border Patrol is being inhibited in their duties to patrol the border because of the wire fences, and that they are prevented from providing aid to illegal BORDER JUMPERS (or as they said, immigrants). 

Biden is more concerned with the safety and ease of access for illegals coming into the US than the safety and security of states that border on Mexico.

It's not a legal conundrum that requires top constitutional law scholars almost a year to figure out. If it happens to be that complicated, then we have a bunch of illegal immigration laws that need serious review for repealing and changing.  When an illegal "immigrant" jumps our border, they waive liability on the part of the US for whatever happens next.  They accepted the consequences ahead of time by voluntarily crossing our border illegally.  I doubt any of then are being forced to cross into the US against their will.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

rpoL98

Re: SCOTUS rules on TX boarder
« Reply #50 on: November 29, 2024, 04:28:52 PM »
sad part is, this only takes care of Texas.

Dem-run California, Arizona, and New Mexico are still wide open.  Texas might have to put up a fence with New Mexico.  Wouldn't be so bad if CA, AZ and NM kept their illegals within their states.