Do you have anything intelligent to post?  Or do you only want to argue and nag?

If you can't find the information, that's fine.  But you didn't say what you did find -- which tells me you never tried.

One-way information flow is getting so, so old.

I didn't start an argument you did, your response to my question was not only irrelevant, it did nothing but pick another pointless argument, like you usually do.

I searched for SCOTUS cases on reversing pardons and found none, what do you want me to post, something else that has nothing to do with SCOTUS?

Congress could impeach to stop the pardon but that wasn't my question was it.

No wonder you couldn't find anything.  Your reading comprehension sucks.  You earned an "F" for that, too.

Show me where i said to find a case in which the SCOTUS reversed a pardon. 

Your comment about Congress is getting warmer, but that deals with a specific argument against giving the president broad, unilateral pardon powers.

Keep looking.  And let me refresh your memory on what I actually did ask:

Do some research and get back to us on the justification the founders relied on to bestow the authority to pardon prisoners onto the President.

Nowhere did i use the words SCOTUS, Supreme Court or reversal in any form.

My question was about how a case would do if it went up through the SCOTUS which is why your series of snarky posts are irrelevant. I know you wanted to ride your high horse and sound superior for your historical knowledge but you obviously failed at reading comprehension since you didn't even understand what I was asking.

No wonder you couldn't find anything.  Your reading comprehension sucks.  You earned an "F" for that, too.

Show me where i said to find a case in which the SCOTUS reversed a pardon. 

Your comment about Congress is getting warmer, but that deals with a specific argument against giving the president broad, unilateral pardon powers.

Keep looking.  And let me refresh your memory on what I actually did ask:

Do some research and get back to us on the justification the founders relied on to bestow the authority to pardon prisoners onto the President.

Nowhere did i use the words SCOTUS, Supreme Court or reversal in any form.

Sounds like hes imagining things so he can think hes right about something. This is another tactic he uses.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Yeah.  Strange how he quoted and replied to my post with my question.  However, he now pretends he was answering his own question ... somehow.  Why quote my post while responding to yourself?

 

Oh, so your question is what you can't answer, but mine you just ignored but started a pissing match about it anyway?

Got it.

You didn't ask a question, you told me to go research something unrelated to my question.

Don't want a pissing match? Don't start them then. My first post didn't quote you but you felt the need to respond with an irrelevant suggestion then got pissy when I pointed out your suggestion was irrelevant

Who's nit picking now?  I gave you a specific question to research.  Not all questions need a question mark, or did you miss the day in English class they covered interrogative sentence structures?

"Do some research and get back to us on the justification the founders relied on to bestow the authority to pardon prisoners onto the President."

Maybe you need every question structured as a 6th grader would?

"What was the justification the founders relied on to bestow the authority to pardon prisoners onto the President?"

No difference between the two QUESTIONS, but you argue one is a question and one isn't.  Irrelevant since you ignored it completely.  Now you want to argue whether or not it was a question?  Are you that stupid, or just practicing your trolling techniques?

Since you obviously can't answer the question in either form, there's no use continuing trying.  I give up trying to teach you anything.

    

If I said I was interested in how bicycles are made and you told me to research the origins of trains then don't go getting offended that I "failed" your research assignment. I don't go researching irrelevant topics because you tell me to. You clearly didn't have any insight into the question I posed so your response was clearly just to start another argument, as you frequently do.