Discussion comments are like jokes.

That may be one of the dumbest things I have seen you type.

i can imagine the police reports you write:
"the suspect was seen firing the handgun at the victim by 5 eyewitnesses. suspect was caught with the handgun at the scene of the shooting.  gunshot residue was found on the suspect's hands, and the handgun was a ballistics match for the bullets retrieved from the victim. it could be more than likely that it appears that the suspect may have shot the victim..."

Police reports shouldn't make conclusions like that, they just document facts so that's a bad example.

Still not sure why it bothers you if I qualify my comments/observations to account for the possibility I am wrong. Memories are fallible, conclusions based on observations are sometimes wrong. I have seen numerous instances where all accounts point to one conclusion only to later find out that the real thing was actually something else.

analogies are hard...

Police reports shouldn't make conclusions like that, they just document facts so that's a bad example.

Still not sure why it bothers you if I qualify my comments/observations to account for the possibility I am wrong. Memories are fallible, conclusions based on observations are sometimes wrong. I have seen numerous instances where all accounts point to one conclusion only to later find out that the real thing was actually something else.

That may be one of the dumbest things I have seen you type.

Originality is hard -- for you.

I was wondering why this thread is 2 pages and I guess why it would be....I guessed right!

I was wondering why this thread is 2 pages and I guess why it would be....I guessed right!

He doesn't drop by often, but when he does, he's like a pigeon playing chess.

He knocks all the pieces off the table and struts around like he won.

Originality is hard -- for you.

Oh the irony of a troll using unoriginality as an insult.
Did you forget your rebuttal at home again? Are you saving your good argument for last?

I was wondering why this thread is 2 pages and I guess why it would be....I guessed right!

You guessed Flapp would start another pointless argument? You guessed correctly but the odds of that are so high it is almost a guarantee.

You guessed Flapp would start another pointless argument? You guessed correctly but the odds of that are so high it is almost a guarantee.

Wrong again.  It's to the point that I'm wondering if EEF likes to be wrong, just so he can be told he is. Cause at his job, he's used to having the authority.  Like a CEO who likes to be a sub by a dom.

Wrong again.  It's to the point that I'm wondering if EEF likes to be wrong, just so he can be told he is. Cause at his job, he's used to having the authority.  Like a CEO who likes to be a sub by a dom.

Of course it was wrong, it is called sarcasm. 

I know you wouldn't bite the hand of your owner.

Of course it was wrong, it is called sarcasm. 

I know you wouldn't bite the hand of your owner.

More tactics, instead of having a civil discussion or admitting your wrong.  Thanks for playing and how come you never replied about being a sub?  Is there any truth to it? hmmmmm.......

More tactics, instead of having a civil discussion or admitting your wrong.

When you respond to me in a civil way we can have a civil discussion.

When you respond to me in a civil way we can have a civil discussion.

No evidence that you can be civil as you post so many contrary statements in order to incite arguments.

When you respond to me in a civil way we can have a civil discussion.

More tactics to justify your replies. What ever helps you think you're never wrong.

No evidence that you can be civil as you post so many contrary statements in order to incite arguments.

So you get triggered by a contrary statement and that is somehow my fault? Sound like an unhinged liberal justifying burning Teslas.

My comments towards other people always start civil, I never take disagreements to the mud.

More tactics to justify your replies. What ever helps you think you're never wrong.

Hahaha, keep justifying your incivility.

So you get triggered by a contrary statement and that is somehow my fault? Sound like an unhinged liberal justifying burning Teslas.

My comments towards other people always start civil, I never take disagreements to the mud.

Did you come up with that on your own, or did AI give you a hand?

Your comments towards other people always start civil?   

Did you come up with that on your own, or did AI give you a hand?

Your comments towards other people always start civil?   

I don't need AI to come up with arguments to beat you.

And yes, I work very much like Tit For Tat. Look up that computer experiment if you don't understand the meaning of the reference.

Hahaha, keep justifying your incivility.

Is someone now trying to play the victim card? Boooohooooo, Hahahahhaha

Is someone now trying to play the victim card? Boooohooooo, Hahahahhaha

Not playing ... he's a victim of his own BS.