Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (Read 29759 times)

sic_semper_tyrannis

http://tinyurl.com/baordty
Quote
On Monday, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama's second term.

Garrow made the following Facebook post:

    I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.

So, who is the source?

Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”

And this is why the Chicago fuckface is pushing so hard for gun control/confiscation.

Funtimes

I'm not saying it couldn't have been said, but some random ass guy, saying some unknown random ass "hero" told him something is nothing more than speculative at best.
Check out the Hawaii Defense Foundation.
HDF on Facebook
Defender of the Accused in Arkansas Courts
Posts are not legal advice & are my own, unless said so.

Kingkeoni

I'm not saying it couldn't have been said, but some random ass guy, saying some unknown random ass "hero" told him something is nothing more than speculative at best.

Are you speculating here?
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.

Cougar8045

I'm not speculating one way or the other, but the only way that a claim about Obama having a sinister plan for the US would be "shocking" is if you're a complete retard.
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

xer 21

I love the smell of bullshit in the morning.

sic_semper_tyrannis

Not shocked by this claim. I merely cut and pasted the title because I'm lazy like that.

As for it being "bullshit," well, truth is often stranger than fiction. I'm sure there were Jews in Germany that thought a lot of the radical rumors about Hitler were "bullshit."

Cougar8045

Not shocked by this claim. I merely cut and pasted the title because I'm lazy like that.

As for it being "bullshit," well, truth is often stranger than fiction. I'm sure there were Jews in Germany that thought a lot of the radical rumors about Hitler were "bullshit."
I don't think anyone here is surprised.  No personal attack intended, just a tongue-in-cheek observation about the conduct of our Anointed One.
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

xer 21

What is strange is that a supposed Nobel Peace prize nominee and a "renowner author and humanitarian" has no wikipedia page.

Truth may often be stranger than fiction but it seems truth as a stranger to this guy.

xer 21

sic_semper_tyrannis

Hey, you can chose to believe him or not. And I would rather err on the side of caution with the Chicago Marxist - I think this clown is capable of anything.

xer 21

Hey, you can chose to believe him or not. And I would rather err on the side of caution with the Chicago Marxist - I think this clown is capable of anything.
i dont think erring on the side of caution is listening to one of Hu Jintao's butt buddies who also might possibly be engaged in massive human trafficking under the guise of "humanitarianism".

sic_semper_tyrannis

So you think Obama has no ill intentions? Okay.

clshade

So you think Obama is the source of the ill intentions you ascribe to him? Okay.

edit - I should add that I don't disagree with the observation that there are ill intentions. I simply think the source of them is outside the political theater we busy ourselves with.

Kingkeoni

So you like to end your sentences with okay? Okay.
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.

xer 21

So you think Obama has no ill intentions? Okay.
doesnt mean im going to believe this kind of shit. 

MDS

Linked is a basic outline of the greater scope surrounding this issue. Some of the documentation is cited and there's other legitimate information on the web that is in-line with this subject matter. Though most is indirect existing concerns via official documentation, I won’t be surprised if more substantial information surfaces regarding this claim within the next month or so giving full merit to substantiate these claims.
http://www.infowars.com/nobel-peace-prize-nominee-obama-asks-military-leaders-if-they-will-fire-on-us-citizens/

clshade

This stuff really shouldn't be shocking. From the point of view of military preparedness, which doesn't require the polite and convoluted talk that the HIll does, it makes sense to be prepared for all possible threats.

That the American people are seen as a possible threat also shouldn't surprise you. Legislation has been trending that way bit by bit for a while. What I'm still not entirely certain of is who we are a threat to and why. I'm pretty sure that they have a lot of money and wisely haven't lived in castles since the 1790's. Not rocket science or tinfoil: just the only group of people that has ever had the means to control nations against the best interests of the people.

I am certain that its not a democrat / republican thing. I'm also pretty sure that the sh*t will hit the fan in one way or another sooner or later. This also isn't really rocket science or tinfoil: 7 billion people with no signs of slowing down, an interlinked world economy that requires continuous growth, food delivery systems which require cheap energy and the approach of peak oil leaves no other possibility. Those who can are preparing for it so that things work out to their benefit, as most crises have for a long, long time. The question being asked isn't really "Will you fire on Americans?" It is "Do you know which master you serve?" That is an entirely appropriate question for the top brass as they have insanely political positions. If it comes down to it that is going to be a very tough call for the men and women who are ordered to do the firing.

If this is the case, I'm pretty sure there is jack sh*t we can do about it, anyway. These are levels of influence that we simply have no access to. Best to just enjoying hanging out and having good beer together while we can.


« Last Edit: January 22, 2013, 03:31:02 PM by clshade »

hnl.flyboy

Until whoever actually made the claim (not someone who heard someone make the claim) speaks up, it's no good in my book.
LEX MALLA, LEX NULLA

FPC, SAF Life, HDF Life, GOA, HRA, Fun Factory VIP

armsinc

http://tinyurl.com/baordty
And this is why the Chicago fuckface is pushing so hard for gun control/confiscation.

It makes perfect sense.... Tinfoil rattling.... Somehow the aliens got to fit into this one......  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Come on now do you really believe Obama wants to kill US citizens....
ArmsInc Hawaii

Kingkeoni

Come on now do you really believe Obama wants to kill US citizens....

Yes

I believe his thirst for absolute power knows no boundaries.

I believe he would willingly take the lives of tens of thousands in order to seal his position of supreme ruler.
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.