If this is about the latest ABC poll it's BS. It was a "weighted" poll, with all the weight on the democrat end. They biased the poll on purpose to make it seem like the Hag was out in front. You just can't believe the rubbish that the networks put out anymore. Every "random" poll that I've seen or participated in has Trump far in the lead, and the properly done weighted polls call it even or within the margin of error. Just the people I talk with here in this state gives me the impression that Trump will win by a large margin. Even hardcore democrats don't trust the Hildebeast.
Most (all?) polling is questionable in accuracy and subject to the advocacy of those paying for the polling. In the recent Brexit polling up until the very day of the vote the polls showed the "do not leave the EU" side winning by a narrow margin. I even saw stories afterwards about people shouting "unfair" because the polls were wrong, as if had the polls indicated the real outcome (leaving the EU) more people would have gone out and voted to stay in the EU. Absurd.
The next president will appoint between 1 and 5 Supreme Court justices, who if they are relatively young when appointed and approved by the Senate, will likely serve for 30 or 40 years. If those appointments are by Clinton or whoever replaces her should she get indicted and convicted (never gonna happen even though she likely is deserving) then the Second Amendment providing any significant meaningful protection for the right to keep and bear arms is more or less done for a couple of generations, maybe forever. (Banning various "assault weapons" (all semi-autos) will be merely "commonsense gun safety regulations" enacted for "public safety" and there will be no right to own such dangerous weapons, even if they had been (wrongly) "in common use for lawful purposes"... i.e. Heller was wrong, etc.).
Now, given that Hawaii voters will overwhelmingly (60% to 70%?) vote for Clinton/Democrat does who you vote for for president here in Hawaii have any effect on the outcome of the Supreme Court appointments, etc.? I'm going to (unfortunately have to) say "NO". There is some possibility that local choices for state and county offices could make a difference for local decisions, and that would be where your vote might "count". I wish it weren't so, but unless there is some unimaginable (to me) catastrophic event (what?) that would cause the Dem Drones to wake up and actually apply critical thinking skills to the issues (even then they could still decide Dem on various issues, including 2A if they simply don't want anyone to have guns, just "because"...), Clinton will win here in a landslide (possibly the most lopsided of all states). And if some of the small minority who would have voted for Trump in a binary choice decide to vote for another candidate or not vote at all it's hard to see how that will make any difference.
